Effect of fermentation by lactobacilli on the functional — technological properties of pea protein isolates

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The effect of fermentation with three bacterial preparations: BK-Uglich-K, BK-Uglich-AB and BK-Uglich-P (Russia) on solubility, emulsifying activity, emulsion stability, foaming and foam stability of isolates preparated from two varieties of peas was studied. It has been shown that fermentation with bacterial cultures can increase the solubility of isolates at pH 3 by 4 to 17.5 times, at pH 4 — more than 3 times, at pH 5 — by 23% to 80%, at pH 6 — by 27% to 43%, at pH 7 — by 18% to 27%. Fermentation increased the index of emulsifying activity of isolates at pH 5 by 37% (in one of the varieties), the stability index of the emulsion at pH 3 by 19% to 28%, at pH 4 — by 17%, at pH 5 — by 18% (in one of the varieties), at pH 6 — by 16% to 35%. Fermentation increased the foaming of isolates at pH 3 by 2.2 times, at pH 4 by 1.4 to 2.4 times, at pH 5 and 6 by 1.8 to 4 times, at pH 7 by 2.1 to 2.4 times; at the same time, the stability of the foam of isolates at pH 4 increased by 11% to 22%, at pH 5 — by 11% to 13%, at pH 6 — by 15% (in one of the varieties), at pH 7 — 28% (in one of the varieties). The results obtained made it possible to select bacterial preparations to improve the parameters of pea protein isolates intended for the manufacture of various food products: pea cola (BK-Uglich-P), analogues of fermented milk products and analogues of milk (BK-Uglich-AB).

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

I. Kravchenko

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ink71@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071

V. Furalyov

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071

E. Pshennikova

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071

A. Fedorov

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071

V. Popov

Bach Institute of Biochemistry, Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: ink71@yandex.ru
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow, 119071

参考

  1. Meinlschmidt P., Ueberham E., Lehmann J., Schweiggert-Weisz U., Eisner P. // Food Chem. 2016. V. 205. P. 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.016
  2. Schlegel K., Leidigkeit A., Eisner P., Schweiggert-Weisz U. // Foods. 2019. V. 8. Р. 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8120678
  3. Lampart-Szczapa E., Konieczny P., Nogala-Kałucka M., Walczak S., Kossowska I., Malinowska M. // Food Chem. 2006. V. 96. P. 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.0315
  4. Liu Y., Zhu S., Li Y., Sun F., Huang D., Chen X. // Food Res. Int. 2023. V. 165. Р. 112453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112453
  5. Schlegel K., Lidzba N., Ueberham E., Eisner P., Schweiggert-Weisz U. //Foods. 2021. V. 10. № 2. Р. 281. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020281
  6. Biscola V., de Olmos A. R., Choiset Y., Rabesona H., Garro M. S., Mozzi F., et al. // Beneficial Microbes. 2017. V. 8. № 4. P. 635–643. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2016.0171
  7. El Mecherfi K.-E., Lupi R., Cherkaoui M., Albuquerque M. A., Todorov S. D., Tranquet O. et al. // Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins. 2022. V. 14. № 5. P. 779-791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-021-09808-1
  8. Lu Q., Zuo L., Wu Z., Li X., Tong P., Wu Y. et al. // Food Chemistry. 2022. V. 366 Р.130569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130569
  9. Nordström E.A., Teixeira C., Montelius C., Jeppsson B., Larsson N. // Benef. Microbes. 2021. V. 12. № 5. P. 441–465. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2020.019
  10. Muñoz R., Rivas B.L., Rodríguez H., Esteban-Torres M., Reverón I. et al. // Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2024. V. 412. P. 110555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2023.110555
  11. García Arteaga V., Leffler S., Muranyi I., Eisner P., Schweiggert-Weisz U. // Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2020. V. 4. P. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2020.12.001
  12. Vazquez-Munoz R., Dongari-Bagtzoglou A. // Front Oral Health. 2021. V. 2. P. 689382. https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2021.689382
  13. Функ И.А., Иркитова А.Н. // Acta Biologiсa Sibirica. 2015. Т.1 . №1–2. С. 85–93. https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.v1i1-2.844
  14. Стоянова Л.Г., Дбар С.Д., Полянская И.С. // Биотехнология. 2022. Т. 38. № 1. С. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.56304/S0234275822010070
  15. Illikoud N., do Carmo F.L.R., Daniel N., Jan G., Gagnaire V. // Food Res Int. 2023. V. 166. P. 112557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112557
  16. Higgins T.J., Chandler P.M., Randall P.J., Spencer D., Beach L.R., Blagrove R.J. et al. // J. Biol. Chem. 1986. V. 261. P. 11124–11130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)67357-0
  17. Stone A.K., Karalash A., Tyler R.T., Warkentin T.D., Nickerson N.T. // Food Research International. 2015. V. 76. P. 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.017
  18. Asen N.D., Aluko R.E. // Front Nutr. 2022. V. 9. P. 852225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.852225
  19. Ivanova P., Kalaydzhiev H., Dessev T.T., Silva C.L.M., Rustad T., Chalova V.I.J. // Food Sci. Technol. 2018. V. 55. № 9. P. 3792–3798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3311-y
  20. Kravchenko I.V., Furalyov V.A., Kostyleva E.V., Sereda A.S., Kurbatova E.I., Tsurikova N.V. et al. // Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2024. V. 60. № 1. P. 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683824010083

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Fig. 1. The effect of fermentation on the solubility of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values: 1 - without fermentation, 2 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-K, 3 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-P, 4 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-AV.

下载 (158KB)
索引源数据
3. Fig. 2. Effect of pea protein fermentation on the emulsifying activity index of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values. 1 — without fermentation, 2 — fermentation of pea protein BK-Uglich-K, 3 — fermentation of pea protein BK-Uglich-P, 4 — fermentation of pea protein BK-Uglich-AV.

下载 (263KB)
索引源数据
4. Fig. 3. Effect of fermentation on the emulsion stability index of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values. 1 - without fermentation, 2 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-K, 3 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-P, 4 - fermentation of BK-Uglich-AV.

下载 (254KB)
索引源数据
5. Fig. 4. Effect of fermentation on foaming of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties at different pH values. 1 — without fermentation, 2 — fermentation of BK-Uglich-K, 3 — fermentation of BK-Uglich-P, 4 — fermentation of BK-Uglich-AV.

下载 (212KB)
索引源数据
6. Fig. 5. Effect of BK fermentation on the foam stability of pea protein isolates of the Fokor (a) and Batrak (b) varieties after 30 and 60 min at different pH values. 1 - without fermentation, 2 - BK-Uglich-K fermentation, 3 - BK-Uglich-P fermentation, 4 - BK-Uglich-AV fermentation.

下载 (402KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025