Current approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of keratoconus in children: a review

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Keratoconus is a progressive degenerative corneal condition, characterized by disrupted and disorganized structure of the collagen matrix, which leads to corneal thinning and ectasia. The combined impact of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors underlie the pathogenesis. The peak manifestation of the condition is usually observed in adolescence and at a young age (15–30 years). However, there are cases of earlier onset, including at a preschool age (the authors had a case in a 5-year-old child), which highlights the need for early detection and timely treatment to prevent irreversible vision loss. Given specific features of children, early diagnosis and timely treatment are critical for preventing severe complications and subsequent need for keratoplasty.

The article reviews current data on the clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for pediatric keratoconus, with a focus on corneal cross-linking as the most effective way to stabilize the condition. The article also discusses the standard Dresden protocol and its modifications, including transepithelial, partial, and accelerated cross-linking, and methods used in case of the thinned cornea.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Elena Yu. Markova

Russian University of Medicine; Eye Center East-Sight Recovery

Author for correspondence.
Email: markova_ej@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4981-0755
SPIN-code: 7984-9373

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Natalia A. Gavrilova

Russian University of Medicine

Email: n_gavrilova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0368-296X
SPIN-code: 9494-9696

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna A. Postolnik

Russian University of Medicine; Eye Center East-Sight Recovery

Email: golubitskikh.anna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-2609-1726
SPIN-code: 4228-4403

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

Natevan F. Didakunan

Russian University of Medicine

Email: natadida2000@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-8934-2983

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Бобкова Д.О. Кератоконус: Современные диагностические аспекты и вопросы классификации // Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. 2022. № 3. С. 13–18. | Bobkova DO. Keratoconus: current aspects of diagnosis and classification. Pacific Medical Journal. 2022;(3):13–18. doi: 10.34215/1609-1175-2022-3-13-18 EDN: RSVFXK
  2. Shah ZA, Purohit DM, Danayak PM, et al. Keratoconus presentation with respect to age, gender, and severity in Western India. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research. 2024;12(2):96–100. doi: 10.4103/jcor.jcor_144_23 EDN: EFLXGW
  3. Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, Tuft SJ. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye. 2013;28(2):189–195. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.278
  4. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Carracedo G, Suzaki A, et al. Keratoconus: An updated review. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2022;45(3):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101559 EDN: HKSTYD
  5. Аверич В.В. Современные методы диагностики и мониторинга кератоконуса // The EYE ГЛАЗ. 2023. T. 25, № 4. С. 322–330. | Averich VV. Modern methods of diagnosis and monitoring of keratoconus. The EYE GLAZ. 2023;25(4):322–330. doi: 10.33791/2222-4408-2023-4-322-330 EDN: QOHNAU
  6. Абельский Д.Е., Вашкевич Г.В., Заборовский И.Г., Столярова Л.А. Кератоконус у детей // Медицинские новости. 2021. № 12. C. 58–61. | Abelski DE, Vashkevich GV, Zabarouski IG, Stolyarova LA. Keratoconus in children. Meditsinckie novosti. 2021;(12):58–61. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/keratokonus-u-detey
  7. Dal A, Canleblebici M, Kutluksaman B, Erdağ M. Effects and safety of combined corneal collagen crosslinking and intrastromal corneal ring segment treatment in patients with keratoconus: a retrospective study. BMC Ophthalmology. 2024;24(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03745-7 EDN: RWJTYZ
  8. Omar I. Simultaneous versus sequential corneal cross-linking and intracorneal ring segments implantation for keratoconus: two-year study. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2025;18(5):840–845. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.05.08 EDN: YVJTZQ
  9. Мамиконян В.Р., Осипян Г.А., Храйстин Х. Имплантация интрастромальных кольцевых сегментов роговицы при кератэктазиях (обзор литературы) // Медицина. 2017. № 2. С. 73–87. | Mamikonyan VR, Osipyan GA, Christein H. Implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for corneal ectasia (review). Meditsina. 2017;(2):73–87. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/implantatsiya-intrastromalnyh-koltsevyh-segmentov-rogovitsy-pri-keratektaziyah-obzor-literatury
  10. Larco P, Larco P, Torres D, Piñero DP. Intracorneal ring segment implantation for the management of keratoconus in children. Vision. 2020;5(1):1. doi: 10.3390/vision5010001
  11. Olivo-Payne A, Abdala-Figuerola A, Hernandez-Bogantes E, et al. Optimal management of pediatric keratoconus: challenges and solutions. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2019;13:1183–1191. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S183347
  12. Abreu AC, Malheiro L, Coelho J, et al. Implantation of intracorneal ring segments in pediatric patients: long-term follow-up. International Medical Case Reports Journal. 2018;11:23–27. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S151383
  13. Gupta Y, Saxena R, Jhanji V, et al. Management outcomes in pediatric keratoconus: Childhood keratoconus study. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022;2022:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2022/4021288 EDN: KLXZVH
  14. Vandevenne MMS, Berendschot TTJM, Winkens B, et al. Efficacy of customized corneal crosslinking versus standard corneal crosslinking in patients with progressive keratoconus (C-CROSS study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmology. 2023;23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02976-4
  15. Маркова Е.Ю., Авакянц Г.В., Кечин Е.В. Кератоконус у детей, современные возможности лечения // Офтальмология. 2021. Т. 18, № 4. С. 840–844. | Markova EYu, Avakyants GV, Kechin EV. Keratoconus in children. мodern treatment options. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(4):840–844. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-840-844 EDN: GOMENB
  16. Gassel CJ, Röck D, Konrad EM, et al. Impact of keratoconus stage on outcome after corneal crosslinking. BMC Ophthalmology. 2022;22(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02425-8
  17. Son HS, Friedrich M, Jun AS, Soiberman US. Advancements and innovations in keratoconus management: a review of current practices. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14(21):7491. doi: 10.3390/jcm14217491
  18. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a–induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2003;135(5):620–627. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1
  19. Jhanji V, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB. Management of keratoconus: current scenario. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;95(8):1044–1050. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.185868
  20. Torricelli AAM, Ford MR, Singh V, et al. BAC-EDTA transepithelial riboflavin-UVA crosslinking has greater biomechanical stiffening effect than standard epithelium-off in rabbit corneas. Experimental Eye Research. 2014;125:114–117. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.06.001
  21. Al Fayez MF, Alfayez S, Alfayez Y. Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus. Cornea. 2015;34(Suppl 10):S53–S56. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000547
  22. Kymionis GD, Diakonis VF, Coskunseven E, et al. Customized pachymetric guided epithelial debridement for corneal collagen cross linking. BMC Ophthalmology. 2009;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-9-10
  23. Анисимов С.И., Анисимова С.Ю., Мистрюков А.С. Персонализированный (локальный) УФ-кросслинкинг в лечении кератоконуса и эктазий роговицы // Офтальмология. 2017. Т. 14, № 3. С. 195–199. | Anisimov SI, Anisimova SYu, Mistryukov AS. Personalized (local) uv-crosslinking as a treatment of keratoconus and corneal ectasia. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2017;14(3):195–199. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2017-3-195-199 EDN: ZHNPSL
  24. Avni-Zauberman N, Avni-Zauberman BS, Weissman A, et al. Accelerated versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking in the treatment of keratoconus: one-year results. Isr Med Assoc J. 2021;23(12):811–814. Available from: https://ima-files.s3.amazonaws.com/334497_55a688e1-e7e3-4dae-a503-95e9fd9347c4.pdf
  25. M Salman A, R Darwish T, H Haddad Y, et al. Accelerated versus standard corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in Syria. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2021;16(3):338–348. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9430
  26. Koç M, Uzel MM, Koban Y, et al. Accelerated corneal cross-linking with a hypoosmolar riboflavin solution in keratoconic thin corneas. Cornea. 2016;35(3):350–354. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000701
  27. Маркова E.Ю., Гаврилова НА. Кросслинкинг роговицы при кератоконусе у детей, оценка эффективности в отдалённом периоде. Клинический случай с катамнезом 5 лет // Офтальмология. 2025. Т. 22, № 3. С. 646–653. | Markova EYu, Gavrilova NA. Corneal crosslinking in keratoconus in children, evaluation of efficiency in the remote period. Clinical case with 5-year follow-up. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(3):646–653. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-646-653 EDN: YDRTFT
  28. Liu Y, Shen D, Wang H, et al. Independent-effect comparison of five crosslinking procedures for progressive keratoconus based on keratometry and the ABCD grading system using generalized estimating equations (GEE). BMC Ophthalmology. 2023;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02744-w EDN: LFSPSW
  29. Kandel H, Abbondanza M, Gupta A, et al. Comparison of standard versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: 5-year outcomes from the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry. Eye. 2023;38(1):95–102. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02641-6 EDN: CPZWTC
  30. Hamida Abdelkader SM, Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, et al. Comparison of different methods of corneal collagen crosslinking: A systematic review. Seminars in Ophthalmology. 2021;36(3):67–74. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1890784 EDN: GSNKEZ
  31. Nour MM, El-Agha MSH, Sherif AM, Shousha SM. Efficacy and safety of contact lens–assisted corneal crosslinking in the treatment of keratoconus with thin corneas. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice. 2021;47(9):500–504. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000799 EDN: GKSERF
  32. Srivatsa S, Jacob S, Agarwal A. Contact lens assisted corneal cross linking in thin ectatic corneas – A review. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020;68(12):2773-2778. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2138_20
  33. Matlov Kormas R, Abu Tailakh M, Chorny A, et al. Accelerated CXL Versus Accelerated Contact Lens–Assisted CXL for Progressive Keratoconus in Adults. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2021;37(9):623–630. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210609-02 EDN: UAEDED
  34. Sachdev MS, Gupta D, Sachdev G, Sachdev R. Tailored stromal expansion with a refractive lenticule for crosslinking the ultrathin cornea. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2015;41(5):918–923. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.007
  35. Unni P, Lee HJ. Systemic Associations with Keratoconus. Life. 2023;13(6):1363. doi: 10.3390/life13061363
  36. Oikarinen A, Oikarinen H, Tan EM, Uitto J. Modulation of collagen metabolism in cultured human skin fibroblasts by dexamethasone: correlation with glucocorticoid receptor density. Acta Derm Venereol. 1987;67(2):106–15. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2438873/
  37. Тарутта Е.П. Федеральные клинические рекомендации «Диагностика и лечение близорукости у детей» // Российская педиатрическая офтальмология. 2014. Т. 9, №2. С. 49–62. | Tarutta EP. Federal Clinical Guidelines “Diagnosis and Treatment of Myopia in Children”. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology. 2014;9(2):49–62. (In Russ.) EDN: SCYCOJ

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2026 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86503 от 11.12.2023 г
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80630 от 15.03.2021 г
.