Current approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of keratoconus in children: a review
- Authors: Markova E.Y.1,2, Gavrilova N.A.1, Postolnik A.A.1,2, Didakunan N.F.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian University of Medicine
- Eye Center East-Sight Recovery
- Issue: Vol 21, No 1 (2026)
- Pages: 53-60
- Section: Reviews
- Published: 30.03.2026
- URL: https://ruspoj.com/1993-1859/article/view/695941
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rpoj695941
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WJBGUP
- ID: 695941
Cite item
Abstract
Keratoconus is a progressive degenerative corneal condition, characterized by disrupted and disorganized structure of the collagen matrix, which leads to corneal thinning and ectasia. The combined impact of genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors underlie the pathogenesis. The peak manifestation of the condition is usually observed in adolescence and at a young age (15–30 years). However, there are cases of earlier onset, including at a preschool age (the authors had a case in a 5-year-old child), which highlights the need for early detection and timely treatment to prevent irreversible vision loss. Given specific features of children, early diagnosis and timely treatment are critical for preventing severe complications and subsequent need for keratoplasty.
The article reviews current data on the clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for pediatric keratoconus, with a focus on corneal cross-linking as the most effective way to stabilize the condition. The article also discusses the standard Dresden protocol and its modifications, including transepithelial, partial, and accelerated cross-linking, and methods used in case of the thinned cornea.
Full Text
About the authors
Elena Yu. Markova
Russian University of Medicine; Eye Center East-Sight Recovery
Author for correspondence.
Email: markova_ej@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4981-0755
SPIN-code: 7984-9373
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowNatalia A. Gavrilova
Russian University of Medicine
Email: n_gavrilova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0368-296X
SPIN-code: 9494-9696
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowAnna A. Postolnik
Russian University of Medicine; Eye Center East-Sight Recovery
Email: golubitskikh.anna@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-2609-1726
SPIN-code: 4228-4403
MD
Russian Federation, Moscow; MoscowNatevan F. Didakunan
Russian University of Medicine
Email: natadida2000@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-8934-2983
MD
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Бобкова Д.О. Кератоконус: Современные диагностические аспекты и вопросы классификации // Тихоокеанский медицинский журнал. 2022. № 3. С. 13–18. | Bobkova DO. Keratoconus: current aspects of diagnosis and classification. Pacific Medical Journal. 2022;(3):13–18. doi: 10.34215/1609-1175-2022-3-13-18 EDN: RSVFXK
- Shah ZA, Purohit DM, Danayak PM, et al. Keratoconus presentation with respect to age, gender, and severity in Western India. Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology and Research. 2024;12(2):96–100. doi: 10.4103/jcor.jcor_144_23 EDN: EFLXGW
- Davidson AE, Hayes S, Hardcastle AJ, Tuft SJ. The pathogenesis of keratoconus. Eye. 2013;28(2):189–195. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.278
- Santodomingo-Rubido J, Carracedo G, Suzaki A, et al. Keratoconus: An updated review. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. 2022;45(3):101559. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2021.101559 EDN: HKSTYD
- Аверич В.В. Современные методы диагностики и мониторинга кератоконуса // The EYE ГЛАЗ. 2023. T. 25, № 4. С. 322–330. | Averich VV. Modern methods of diagnosis and monitoring of keratoconus. The EYE GLAZ. 2023;25(4):322–330. doi: 10.33791/2222-4408-2023-4-322-330 EDN: QOHNAU
- Абельский Д.Е., Вашкевич Г.В., Заборовский И.Г., Столярова Л.А. Кератоконус у детей // Медицинские новости. 2021. № 12. C. 58–61. | Abelski DE, Vashkevich GV, Zabarouski IG, Stolyarova LA. Keratoconus in children. Meditsinckie novosti. 2021;(12):58–61. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/keratokonus-u-detey
- Dal A, Canleblebici M, Kutluksaman B, Erdağ M. Effects and safety of combined corneal collagen crosslinking and intrastromal corneal ring segment treatment in patients with keratoconus: a retrospective study. BMC Ophthalmology. 2024;24(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03745-7 EDN: RWJTYZ
- Omar I. Simultaneous versus sequential corneal cross-linking and intracorneal ring segments implantation for keratoconus: two-year study. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 2025;18(5):840–845. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2025.05.08 EDN: YVJTZQ
- Мамиконян В.Р., Осипян Г.А., Храйстин Х. Имплантация интрастромальных кольцевых сегментов роговицы при кератэктазиях (обзор литературы) // Медицина. 2017. № 2. С. 73–87. | Mamikonyan VR, Osipyan GA, Christein H. Implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments for corneal ectasia (review). Meditsina. 2017;(2):73–87. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/implantatsiya-intrastromalnyh-koltsevyh-segmentov-rogovitsy-pri-keratektaziyah-obzor-literatury
- Larco P, Larco P, Torres D, Piñero DP. Intracorneal ring segment implantation for the management of keratoconus in children. Vision. 2020;5(1):1. doi: 10.3390/vision5010001
- Olivo-Payne A, Abdala-Figuerola A, Hernandez-Bogantes E, et al. Optimal management of pediatric keratoconus: challenges and solutions. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2019;13:1183–1191. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S183347
- Abreu AC, Malheiro L, Coelho J, et al. Implantation of intracorneal ring segments in pediatric patients: long-term follow-up. International Medical Case Reports Journal. 2018;11:23–27. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S151383
- Gupta Y, Saxena R, Jhanji V, et al. Management outcomes in pediatric keratoconus: Childhood keratoconus study. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2022;2022:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2022/4021288 EDN: KLXZVH
- Vandevenne MMS, Berendschot TTJM, Winkens B, et al. Efficacy of customized corneal crosslinking versus standard corneal crosslinking in patients with progressive keratoconus (C-CROSS study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Ophthalmology. 2023;23(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02976-4
- Маркова Е.Ю., Авакянц Г.В., Кечин Е.В. Кератоконус у детей, современные возможности лечения // Офтальмология. 2021. Т. 18, № 4. С. 840–844. | Markova EYu, Avakyants GV, Kechin EV. Keratoconus in children. мodern treatment options. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(4):840–844. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2021-4-840-844 EDN: GOMENB
- Gassel CJ, Röck D, Konrad EM, et al. Impact of keratoconus stage on outcome after corneal crosslinking. BMC Ophthalmology. 2022;22(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02425-8
- Son HS, Friedrich M, Jun AS, Soiberman US. Advancements and innovations in keratoconus management: a review of current practices. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14(21):7491. doi: 10.3390/jcm14217491
- Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a–induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2003;135(5):620–627. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1
- Jhanji V, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB. Management of keratoconus: current scenario. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2010;95(8):1044–1050. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.185868
- Torricelli AAM, Ford MR, Singh V, et al. BAC-EDTA transepithelial riboflavin-UVA crosslinking has greater biomechanical stiffening effect than standard epithelium-off in rabbit corneas. Experimental Eye Research. 2014;125:114–117. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.06.001
- Al Fayez MF, Alfayez S, Alfayez Y. Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus. Cornea. 2015;34(Suppl 10):S53–S56. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000547
- Kymionis GD, Diakonis VF, Coskunseven E, et al. Customized pachymetric guided epithelial debridement for corneal collagen cross linking. BMC Ophthalmology. 2009;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-9-10
- Анисимов С.И., Анисимова С.Ю., Мистрюков А.С. Персонализированный (локальный) УФ-кросслинкинг в лечении кератоконуса и эктазий роговицы // Офтальмология. 2017. Т. 14, № 3. С. 195–199. | Anisimov SI, Anisimova SYu, Mistryukov AS. Personalized (local) uv-crosslinking as a treatment of keratoconus and corneal ectasia. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2017;14(3):195–199. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2017-3-195-199 EDN: ZHNPSL
- Avni-Zauberman N, Avni-Zauberman BS, Weissman A, et al. Accelerated versus standard corneal collagen crosslinking in the treatment of keratoconus: one-year results. Isr Med Assoc J. 2021;23(12):811–814. Available from: https://ima-files.s3.amazonaws.com/334497_55a688e1-e7e3-4dae-a503-95e9fd9347c4.pdf
- M Salman A, R Darwish T, H Haddad Y, et al. Accelerated versus standard corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in Syria. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research. 2021;16(3):338–348. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9430
- Koç M, Uzel MM, Koban Y, et al. Accelerated corneal cross-linking with a hypoosmolar riboflavin solution in keratoconic thin corneas. Cornea. 2016;35(3):350–354. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000701
- Маркова E.Ю., Гаврилова НА. Кросслинкинг роговицы при кератоконусе у детей, оценка эффективности в отдалённом периоде. Клинический случай с катамнезом 5 лет // Офтальмология. 2025. Т. 22, № 3. С. 646–653. | Markova EYu, Gavrilova NA. Corneal crosslinking in keratoconus in children, evaluation of efficiency in the remote period. Clinical case with 5-year follow-up. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2025;22(3):646–653. doi: 10.18008/1816-5095-2025-3-646-653 EDN: YDRTFT
- Liu Y, Shen D, Wang H, et al. Independent-effect comparison of five crosslinking procedures for progressive keratoconus based on keratometry and the ABCD grading system using generalized estimating equations (GEE). BMC Ophthalmology. 2023;23(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02744-w EDN: LFSPSW
- Kandel H, Abbondanza M, Gupta A, et al. Comparison of standard versus accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus: 5-year outcomes from the Save Sight Keratoconus Registry. Eye. 2023;38(1):95–102. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02641-6 EDN: CPZWTC
- Hamida Abdelkader SM, Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, et al. Comparison of different methods of corneal collagen crosslinking: A systematic review. Seminars in Ophthalmology. 2021;36(3):67–74. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1890784 EDN: GSNKEZ
- Nour MM, El-Agha MSH, Sherif AM, Shousha SM. Efficacy and safety of contact lens–assisted corneal crosslinking in the treatment of keratoconus with thin corneas. Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice. 2021;47(9):500–504. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000799 EDN: GKSERF
- Srivatsa S, Jacob S, Agarwal A. Contact lens assisted corneal cross linking in thin ectatic corneas – A review. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2020;68(12):2773-2778. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2138_20
- Matlov Kormas R, Abu Tailakh M, Chorny A, et al. Accelerated CXL Versus Accelerated Contact Lens–Assisted CXL for Progressive Keratoconus in Adults. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2021;37(9):623–630. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210609-02 EDN: UAEDED
- Sachdev MS, Gupta D, Sachdev G, Sachdev R. Tailored stromal expansion with a refractive lenticule for crosslinking the ultrathin cornea. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2015;41(5):918–923. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.04.007
- Unni P, Lee HJ. Systemic Associations with Keratoconus. Life. 2023;13(6):1363. doi: 10.3390/life13061363
- Oikarinen A, Oikarinen H, Tan EM, Uitto J. Modulation of collagen metabolism in cultured human skin fibroblasts by dexamethasone: correlation with glucocorticoid receptor density. Acta Derm Venereol. 1987;67(2):106–15. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2438873/
- Тарутта Е.П. Федеральные клинические рекомендации «Диагностика и лечение близорукости у детей» // Российская педиатрическая офтальмология. 2014. Т. 9, №2. С. 49–62. | Tarutta EP. Federal Clinical Guidelines “Diagnosis and Treatment of Myopia in Children”. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology. 2014;9(2):49–62. (In Russ.) EDN: SCYCOJ
Supplementary files


