<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Российская педиатрическая офтальмология</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">1993-1859</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2412-432X</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">39561</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18821/1993-1859-2017-12-4-193-199</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">PROTEOMIC DIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIES AND THEIR APPLICATION FOR THE REFRACTIVE CORRECTION OF AMETROPIA</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>ПРОТЕОМНЫЕ ДИАГНОСТИЧЕСКИЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ В РЕФРАКЦИОННОЙ КОРРЕКЦИИ АМЕТРОПИЙ</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kovalevskaya</surname><given-names>M. A</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ковалевская</surname><given-names>М. А</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Chernikova</surname><given-names>I. V</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Черникова</surname><given-names>И. В</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Podoprigora</surname><given-names>V. S</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Подопригора</surname><given-names>В. С</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Sergeeva</surname><given-names>Mariya I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сергеева</surname><given-names>Мария Игоревна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="en"><p>assistant, Department of Ophthalmology, N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University, 394000, Voronezh, Russian Federation</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>ассистент кафедры офтальмологии Воронежского государственного медицинского университета им. Н.Н. Бурденко</p></bio><email>misoph@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО «Воронежский государственный медицинский университет им. Н.Н. Бурденко» Минздрава России</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff2"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Dr. Chernikova Eye Centre</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ООО «Глазной центр доктора Черниковой»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2017-12-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en">VOL 12, NO4 (2017)</issue-title><issue-title xml:lang="ru">ТОМ 12, №4 (2017)</issue-title><fpage>193</fpage><lpage>199</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-07-22"><day>22</day><month>07</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2017, Eco-Vector</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2017, ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">ООО "Эко-Вектор"</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ruspoj.com/1993-1859/article/view/39561">https://ruspoj.com/1993-1859/article/view/39561</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Aim. The objective of the present study was the analysis of the tear fluid proteomic status and the eye surface of the patients presenting with ametropia before and after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Material and methods. The study included 163 patients (326 eyes) divided into three groups. Group 1 was comprised of 51 adult patients (102 eyes)at the age from 35 to 54 years suffering from high-degree myopia and astigmatism. Group 2 was composed of 26 adult patients (52 eyes) at the age from 35 to 55 years suffering from moderate or high-degree hyperopia and astigmatism. Group 3 consisted of 86 younger patients (172 eyes) at the age from 18 to 54 years suffering from high-degree myopia and astigmatism. The dry eye syndrome and the state pf the cornea were diagnosed with the use of the Lipkof’s test, Schirmer’s test, TBUT test, and corneal fluorescence staining. The antioxidant activity of the tears was estimated based on the results of measurements of peroxyredoxin-6 (PEDX6) expression. Results. The level of PEDX6 expression after LASIK increased in the patients presenting with myopia by 1.4 times and in those with hyperopia by 1.07 times, that is it changed but slightly after the operation and was 6.2 times less pronounced in comparison was the myopes. Conclusion. The study has demonstrated that two methods proved reliable for the evaluation of the tear fluid proteomic status, viz. the Lipkof’s test (1.82 ± 0.2mm, stage 3) and the TBUT test (8.0 ± 1.46 seconds), suggesting the presence of grade 2 dry eye syndrome. Te same refers to the patients of group 2: the results of the Lipkof’s test (1.31 ± 0.2mm) and the TBUT test (8.23 ± 0.87 seconds). The level of antioxidant protection of the ocular surface (PEDX6 expression) depended on the type of the refractive error: in the patients of group 1 before and after LASIK, PEDX6 expression was 4.7 times (13.57 ± 0.83) and 6.2 (19.31 ± 0.71) higher 2.88 ± 0.38 and 3.09 ± 0.47) than in those of group 2, respectively. In addition, it was shown that the level of antioxidant protection of the ocular surface (PEDX6 expression) depended on the age of the patients prior to LASIK: it was 1.3 lower in group 1 than in group 3 (1.35 ± 0.83 and 17.77 ± 1.03 respectively). The clinical significance of the tests for the tear fluid production and proteomic status changed appreciably after LASIK. The TBUT test for diagnostics of dry eye syndrome remained reliable in all the groups.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Цель. Анализ протеомного статуса слезной жидкости и состояния глазной поверхности у пациентов с аметропиями до и после операции ЛАСИК. Материал и методы. В исследование включены 163 пациента (326 глаз), которые были распределены на 3 группы: 1-я группа - 51 (102 глаза) пациент зрелого возраста (от 35 до 54 лет) с миопией высокой степени и астигматизмом; 2-я - 26 (52 глаза) пациентов зрелого возраста (от 35 до 55 лет) с гиперметропией средней, высокой степени и астигматизмом; 3-я - 86 (172 глаза) пациентов молодого возраста (от 18 до 34 лет) с миопией высокой степени и астигматизмом. Осуществляли диагностику «сухого глаза» и состояния роговицы (тест Липкоф, тест Ширмера, проба Норна, окраска роговицы флюоресцеином), определяли показатели антиоксидантной активности слезы - экспрессия пероксиредоксина 6 (PRDX6). Результаты и обсуждение. Уровень экспрессии PRDX 6 после ЛАСИК у пациентов с миопией повысился в 1,4 раза, у пациентов с гиперметропией - в 1,07 раз, то есть изменился незначительно после операции и был 6,2 раза меньше, чем у миопов. Выводы. В 1-й группе достоверными были 2 пробы на качество слезы: тест Липкоф (1,82 ± 0,2 мм - стадия 3), проба Норна (8,0 ± 1,46 сек), свидетельствовавшие о наличии синдрома «сухого глаза» II степени; во 2-й группе - тест Липкоф 1,31 ± 0,2 мм (стадия 2), проба Норна 8,23 ± 0,87 сек (снижение) - синдром «сухого глаза» II степени. Уровень антиоксидантной защиты (экспрессии PRDX6) глазной поверхности зависит от вида аметропии: в 1-й группе до операции ЛАСИК экспрессия PRDX6 в 4,7 раз выше (13,57 ± 0,83), после - в 6,2 раза выше (19,31 ± 0,71), чем во 2-й группе (2,88 ± 0,38 и 3,09 ± 0,47 соответственно); а также от возраста пациента (до операции): в 1-й группе уровень экспрессии PRDX6 в 1,3 раза меньше, чем в 3-й группе (13,57 ± 0,83 и 17,77 ± 1,03). После операции ЛАСИК изменяется значимость тестов на продукцию и качество слезы. Достоверной во всех группах является проба Норна (синдрома «сухого глаза» II степени).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>refraction</kwd><kwd>peroxyredoxin-6 expression</kwd><kwd>Lasik</kwd><kwd>dry eye syndrome</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рефракция</kwd><kwd>экспрессия пероксиредоксина 6</kwd><kwd>ЛАСИК</kwd><kwd>синдром «сухого глаза»</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Cosar C.B., Sener A.B. Supracor hyperopia and presbyopia correction: 6-month results. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2014; 24(3): 325-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Костенёв С.В., Литасова Ю.А., Черных В.В. Исследование изменений формы и толщины роговицы после laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Офтальмохирургия. 2010; (2): 4-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Корниловский И.М., Сычев А.Г., Купцова О.Н., Карпов В.Е., Черных Ю.А. Биоптический подход к выбору метода коррекции пресбиопии В кн.: Тезисы докладов 9-го Съезда офтальмологов России. М.; 2010; 91.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Novae G.D. Symposium on dry eye diagnosis and treatment. Ophthalmology World News. 1995; 1(5): 20.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Shimmura S., Shimazaki J., Tsubota K. Results of a population-based questionnaire on the Symptoms and lifestyles associated with dry eyes. Cornea. 1999; 18: 408-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Brewitt H., Sistani F. Dry eye disease: the scale of the problem. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2001; 45(2): 199-202.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Uthoff D., Pölzl M., Hepper D., Holland D. A new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2012; 250: 1649-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Ryan A., O’Keefe M. Corneal approach to hyperopic presbyopia treatment: six-month outcomes of a new multifocal excimer laser in situ keratomileusis procedure. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2013; 39: 1226-33.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Alió J.L., Chaubard J.J., Caliz A., Sala E., Patel S. Correction of presbyopia by technovision central multifocal LASIK (presbyLASIK). J. Refract. Surg. 2006; 22(5): 453-60.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Kleinstein R.N. Epidemiology of presbyopia. In: Stark L., Obrecht G. (Еds.). Presbyopia. New York: Professional Press; 1987: 12-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Holden B.A., Fricke T., Ho S., Wong R., Schlenther G., Cronje S. et al. Global vision impairment due to uncorrected presbyopia. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2008; 126: 1731-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Burke A.G., Patel I., Munoz B., Kayongoya A., McHiwa W., Schwarzwalder A.W. et al. Population-based study of presbyopia in rural Tanzania. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113: 723-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Рудакова Т.Е. Возрастные особенности аккомодационного аппарата. Особенности эксимер-лазерной коррекции миопии у пациентов старше 40 лет. Коррекция пресбиопии. Рефракционная хирургия и офтальмология. 2001; 1(1): 72-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Michael R., Bron A.J. The ageing lens and cataract: a model of normal and pathological ageing. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2011; 366(1568): 1278-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Davson H. Physiology of the Eye. 5th Ed. New York: Pergamon Press; 1990; 754-66.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Gilmartin B.G. The etiology of presbyopia: A summary of the role of lenticular and extralenticular structures. Ophthalm. Physiol. Opt. 1995; 15: 431-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman P.L. Accommodation and presbyopia. Neuromuscular and biophysical aspects. In: Adler’s Physiology of the Eye, (Ed. W.M. Hart) 9th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby - Year Book. 1992; 411-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Stark L. Presbyopia in light of accommodation. In: Presbyopia. Eds. L. Stark, G. Obrecht. New York: Professional Press; 1987: 264-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Wyatt H.J. Application of a simple mechanical model of accommodation of the aging eye. Vision Res. 1993; 33: 731-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Courtoise Y. The capsule of thecrystalline lens. In: Presbyopia. Eds. L. Stark, G. Obrecht. New York: Profesional Press; 1987: 45-53.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Truscott R.J. Presbyopia. Emerging from a blur towards an understanding of the molecular basis for this most common eye condition. Exp. Eye Res. 2009; 88: 241-7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Sweeney M.H., Truscott R.J. An impediment to glutathione diffusion in older normal human lenses: a possible precondition for nuclear cataract. Exp. Eye Res. 1998; 67: 587-95.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
