Machine learning for public wellness: optimizing hygiene practices and pollution monitoring in smart cities
- Authors: Udayakumar R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kalinga University
- Issue: Vol 103, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 216-222
- Section: ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE
- Published: 09.04.2024
- URL: https://ruspoj.com/0016-9900/article/view/638236
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-3-216-222
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/giwvdk
- ID: 638236
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. Public health in urban areas is of paramount importance, particularly in the context of smart cities where technology plays a vital role. The integration of sophisticated infrastructure and data-driven systems in smart cities has the potential to significantly enhance public health outcomes. This improvement hinges on optimizing various factors, especially in the realms of hygiene standards and pollution monitoring. The ability to adhere to stringent hygiene procedures and closely monitor pollutants is essential for mitigating health risks in densely populated urban environments. As metropolitan areas become increasingly complex, there is a pressing need to prioritize the optimization of these processes.
Materials and Methods. To address the challenges associated with public health optimization in smart cities, this study introduces Optimized Public Wellness using Machine Learning (OPWML). OPWML employs advanced machine learning techniques to augment hygiene protocols and pollution surveillance in smart urban areas. The proposed approach incorporates real-time validation, enhanced data-collecting efficiency, intelligent intervention impact, and increased throughput. The methodology aims to streamline processes and overcome the limitations of current approaches, providing more precise and prompt outcomes.
Results. Simulation findings demonstrate the superior performance of OPWML compared to other methods. The average estimate accuracy achieved by OPWML is 86.76%, showcasing its efficacy in delivering accurate results. Real-time validation latency is notably low at 12.99 ms, indicating the system’s responsiveness. With a data collection efficiency of 22.96 GB/hour, OPWML demonstrates its ability to efficiently gather relevant data. The smart intervention impact of 33.20% underscores the system’s effectiveness in implementing intelligent interventions. Additionally, the throughput of 314.67 kbps signifies the high processing capacity of OPWML.
Limitations. While OPWML exhibits promising results, it is essential to acknowledge certain limitations in this study. The simulation-based nature of the findings may not fully capture real-world complexities. Additionally, the generalizability of the results to diverse urban contexts requires further investigation. Limitations such as data privacy concerns and potential technological barriers should also be considered when implementing OPWML in practical settings.
Conclusion. In conclusion, Optimized Public Wellness using Machine Learning (OPWML) emerges as a powerful tool for transforming public health processes in smart cities. The study highlights OPWML’s capacity to significantly enhance hygiene protocols and pollution surveillance, ensuring a healthier and environmentally sustainable urban setting. While acknowledging certain study limitations, the overall outcomes emphasize the potential of OPWML in revolutionizing public health practices and contributing to the well-being of urban populations in the era of smart cities.
Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require an opinion from a biomedical ethics committee or other documents.
Acknowledgment. There is no financial support for the article
Conflict of interest. There is no conflict of interest.
Received: December 15, 2023 / Revised: February 02, 2024 / Accepted: March 11, 2024 / Published: April 10, 2024
About the authors
Ramanathan Udayakumar
Kalinga University
Author for correspondence.
Email: rsukumar2007@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1395-583X
Dean, Department of CS & IT, Kalinga University, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492101, India
e-mail: rsukumar2007@gmail.com
Russian FederationReferences
- Karim S.A., Chen H.F. Deaths from COVID‐19 in rural, micropolitan, and metropolitan areas: a county‐level comparison. J. Rural Health. 2021; 37(1): 124–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12533
- Zhao Z., Pan Y., Zhu J., Wu J., Zhu R. The impact of urbanization on delivering public service-related SDGs in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022; 80: 103776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103776
- Rony M.K.K., Sharmi P.D., Alamgir H.M. Addressing antimicrobial resistance in low and middle-income countries: overcoming challenges and implementing effective strategies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023; 30(45): 101896–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29434-4
- Kim H., Choi H., Kang H., An J., Yeom S., Hong T. A systematic review of the smart energy conservation system: From smart homes to sustainable smart cities. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2021; 140: 110755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110755
- Deng T., Zhang K., Shen Z.J.M. A systematic review of a digital twin city: A new pattern of urban governance toward smart cities. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2021; 6(2): 125–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.03.003
- Liu L., Guo X., Lee C. Promoting smart cities into the 5G era with multi-field Internet of Things (IoT) applications powered with advanced mechanical energy harvesters. Nano Energy. 2021; 88: 106304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106304
- Herath H.M.K.K.M.B., Mittal M. Adoption of artificial intelligence in smart cities: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights. 2022; 2(1): 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100076
- Awan F.M., Minerva R., Crespi N. Using noise pollution data for traffic prediction in smart cities: experiments based on LSTM recurrent neural networks. IEEE Sens. J. 2021; 21(18): 20722–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3100324
- Thakur J.S., Paika R. Smart health and wellness promoting villages: a case study from India. In: Lakshmanan V.I., Chockalingam A., Murty V.K., Kalyanasundaram S., eds. Smart Villages. Cham: Springer; 2022: 321–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68458-7_24
- Sinha M., Chacko E., Makhija P., Pramanik S. Energy-Efficient smart cities with green Internet of things. In: Chakraborty C., ed. Green Technological Innovation for Sustainable Smart Societies. Cham: Springer; 2021: 345–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73295-0_16
- Blasi S., Ganzaroli A., De Noni I. Smartening sustainable development in cities: Strengthening the theoretical linkage between smart cities and SDGs. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2022; 80: 103793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103793
- Fadda M., Anedda M., Girau R., Pau G., Giusto D.D. A social Internet of Things smart city solution for traffic and pollution monitoring in Cagliari. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022; 10(3): 2373–90. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3211093
- Geropanta V., Karagianni A., Mavroudi S., Parthenios P. Exploring the relationship between the smart-sustainable city, well-being, and urban planning: An analysis of current European approaches. In: Visvizi A., Pérez del Hoyo R., eds. Smart Cities and the UN SDGs. Elsevier; 2021: 143–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85151-0.00010-5
- García L., Garcia-Sanchez A.J., Asorey-Cacheda R., Garcia-Haro J., Zúñiga-Cañón C.L. Smart air quality monitoring IoT-based infrastructure for industrial environments. Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23): 9221. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239221
- Ullah F., Qayyum S., Thaheem M.J., Al-Turjman F., Sepasgozar S.M.E. Risk management in sustainable smart cities governance: A TOE framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change. 2021; 167: 120743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120743
- Liu L., Zhang Y. Smart environment design planning for smart city based on deep learning. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021; 47: 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101425
Supplementary files
