Hygienic assessment of the acoustic load on airport ground staff during ground handling of aircrafts

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Among the occupational factors having a harmful effect on the body of airport ground staff, noise dominates, the levels of which may exceed normative values.

The purpose of the study. To assess the acoustic loads on airport ground staff when working on the platform of a modern airport.

Materials and methods. Noise measurements at the workplaces of airport ground staff of the profession “Duty “follow me” Driver” (hereinafter referred to as the Duty Driver) were carried out in accordance with GOST ISO 9612–2016. On the basis of the analysis of the working situation and the typical structure of the working day a measurement strategy based on the labour function was adopted. The CENTER 322 noise meter was used to measure the noise.

Results. The basic duration of the Duty Driver’s working shift is 10.5 hours and the effective duration of the working day in the sector of the installation of the aircraft (AC) at the parking place (PP) is 4 hours. It is revealed that the greatest noise load on the Duty Officer occurs at the time of coordination of the AC on PP. The main and basic sources of noise in this case are the working turbines of the aircraft. The maximum sound pressure levels depended on the type of aircraft and ranged from 91.2 dBA for the Boeing-747 to 111.0 dBA for the AN-26. The equivalent sound pressure level for a 10.5-hour working day was 92.3 ± 3.4 dBA, for the effective duration of the working day (4 hours) — 96.5 ± 3.4 dBA. The maximum sound levels for most brands of modern aircraft do not exceed the standard parameters. Equivalent sound pressure levels exceed the established standards by 12.3–16.5 dBA.

Limitations of the study. Since the Duty Driver was wearing a microphone on himself, there were uncertainties caused by the shielding and reflecting effects of the body.

Conclusion. Duty Drivers are exposed to noise exceeding hygienic standards. This makes it possible to attribute the workplace of the Duty Officers to the harmful class of working conditions 3.2 according to the acoustic factor and makes it necessary for them to use personal protective equipment against noise when working on the platform.

Compliance with ethical standards. The study does not require the submission of the conclusion of the Biomedical Ethics Committee or other documents.

Contribution:
Karelin A.O. — the concept and design of the study; analysis of the data, writing the text of the manuscript, editing;
Filipchick O.E. — collection and processing of material, analysis of the data, writing the text of the manuscript;
Yeremin G.B. — conceptualization, verification.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: April 28, 2023 / Accepted: June 7, 2023 / Published: October 9, 2023

About the authors

Alexander O. Karelin

I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: karelin52@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2467-7887

MD, PhD, DSci., Professor, Chief of the Department of General Hygiene and Ecology, I.P. Pavlov First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, 197022, Russian Federation.

e-mail: karelin52@mail.ru

Russian Federation

Olga E. Filipchick

Limited Liability Company “Air Gates of the Northern Capital”

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-9999-4956
Russian Federation

Gennadiy B. Yeremin

North-West Public Health Research Center

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1629-5435
Russian Federation

References

  1. State Report «On the state of sanitary and epidemiological welfare of the population in the Russian Federation in 2021». Moscow; 2022. (in Russian)
  2. Lebedev K.Yu., Kopytenkova O.I., Vyucheyskaya D.S., Levanchuk A.V., Afanas’eva T.A. Hygienic aspects of urban planning on the aerodrome environs. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2019; (10): 46–9. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2019-319-10-46-49 https://elibrary.ru/bxdqfc (in Russian)
  3. Vil’k M.F., Glukhovskiy V.D., Kur’erov N.N., Pankova V.B., Prokopenko L.V. Contemporary methodic approach to evaluation of acoustic load on civil aircraft crew members. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2017; 57(3): 27–32. https://elibrary.ru/ygbnuf (in Russian)
  4. Kharitonov V.V., Klenkov R.R., Penchuchenko V.V., Abashev V.Yu., Sheshegov P.M., Zinkin V.N. Aviation noise and the risk of reducing the reliability of the flight crew. Bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2018; (1): 32–8. https://elibrary.ru/ylvggy (in Russian)
  5. Adeninskaya E.E., Simonova N.I., Machalov A.S. Problems of diagnosis and the factors of hearing disorders in civil aviation flight crew members. Vestnik sovremennoy klinicheskoy meditsiny. 2019; 12(6): 12–8. https://doi.org/10.20969/VSKM.2019.12(6).12-18 https://elibrary.ru/sxcqkw (in Russian)
  6. Vil’k M.F., Pankova V.B., Glukhovskiy V.D., Kaptsov V.A. Aviation intra-cabin noise as the factor of the risk of professional carriage development. Meditsina ekstremal’nykh situatsiy. 2018; 20(3): 340–6. https://elibrary.ru/ybkipz (in Russian)
  7. Morais-Moreno C., Montero-Bravo A.M., Puga A.M., de Lourdes Samaniego-Vaesken M., Ruperto M., Marco Mendez R., et al. Hearing function and nutritional status in aviation pilots from Spain exposed to high acoustic damage. Nutrients. 2022; 14(20): 4321. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14204321
  8. Zabrodina N.N., Adeninskaya E.E., Simonova N.I. Validity of using protocols for calculating acoustic load for flight crew members during the compilation of sanitary and hygienic characteristics of working conditions. Sanitarnyy vrach. 2019; (12): 43–8. https://doi.org/10.33920/med-08-1912-05 https://elibrary.ru/qpdmbq (in Russian)
  9. Bukhtiyarov I.V., Zibarev E.V., Kur’erov N.N., Immel’ O.V. Sanitary and hygienic assessment of working conditions of civil aviation pilots. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2021; 100(10): 1084–94. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-10-1084-1094 https://elibrary.ru/pbxacr (in Russian)
  10. Molesworth B.R., Burgess M., Zhou A. The effects of noise on key workplace skills. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2015; 138(4): 2054–61. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4929741
  11. Iordanishvili A.K. Structural changes in masticatory apparatus organs and tissues with chronic environmental pathogenic factor exposure of flight labor. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2022; 26(1): 31–40. https://doi.org/10.17816/1728-2802-2022-26-1-31-40 https://elibrary.ru/okipmn (in Russian)
  12. Müller R., Schneider J. Noise exposure and auditory thresholds of German airline pilots: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(5): e012913. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-01
  13. Kuo C.Y., Hung C.L., Chen H.C., Shih C.P., Lu R.H., Chen C.W., et al. The immediate and long-term impact of military aircraft noise on hearing: a cross-sectional comparison of fighter pilots and ground staff. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021; 18(6): 2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062982
  14. Shcherbakov S.A., Kukushkin Yu.A., Soldatov S.K., Bogomolov A.V., Zinkin B.N., Shishov A.A., et al. Cumulative medical and environmental effects of the combined action of noise and infrasound. Biomeditsinskaya radioelektronika. 2007; (12): 21–7. https://elibrary.ru/jscogp (in Russian)
  15. Zinkin V.N., Bogomolov A.V., Dragan S.P., Akhmetzyanov I.M. Cumulative medical and environmental effects of the combined action of noise and infrasound. Ekologiya i promyshlennost’ Rossii. 2012; (3): 46–9. https://elibrary.ru/ovxtnt (in Russian)
  16. Zinkin V.N., Bogomolov A.V., Akhmetzyanov I.M., Sheshegov P.M. Aviation noise: specifics of the biological action and protection. Aviakosmicheskaya i ekologicheskaya meditsina. 2012; 46(2): 9–16. https://elibrary.ru/pvnhxf (in Russian)
  17. Dragan S.P., Zinkin V.N., Kukushkin Yu.A., Soldatov S.K. Hygienic evaluation of acoustic workplace environment of aviation professionals and the driver heavy truck and methods of their anti-noise. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2013; (12): 29–30. https://elibrary.ru/rpjvgl (in Russian)
  18. Soldatov S.K., Zinkin V.N., Bogomolov A.V., Kukushkin Yu.A. Man and aircraft noise. Bezopasnost’ zhiznedeyatel’nosti. 2012; (S9): 1–24. https://elibrary.ru/ouozir (in Russian)
  19. Medvedeva S.A., Gorbay D.M., Dranishnikova I.R. Assessment of retrospective and anticipated professional risks in air transport industry. XXI vek. Tekhnosfernaya bezopasnost’. 2017; 2(2): 18–29. https://elibrary.ru/yrulwf (in Russian)
  20. Sheshegov P.M., Slivina L.P., Zinkin V.N. The value of aircraft noise the risk of development of occupational diseases in flying personnel of the air force. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2020; 60(4): 268–74. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-4-268-274 https://elibrary.ru/evcfbb (in Russian)
  21. Plakhov N.N., Glaznikov L.A., Sorokina L.A., Buynov L.G. Aviation noise as a major adverse factor in the professional activity of carrier-based aircraft technical personnel. Aviakosmicheskaya i ekologicheskaya meditsina. 2017; 51(4): 34–8. https://doi.org/10.21687/0233-528X-2017-51-4-34-38 https://elibrary.ru/zccnkr (in Russian)
  22. Kharitonov V.V. Means of collective protection from aviation noise: justification, requirements, tests. Problemy bezopasnosti poletov. 2022; (3): 45–7. https://doi.org/10.36535/0235-5000-2022-03-4 https://elibrary.ru/nkvhxe (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Karelin A.O., Filipchick O.E., Yeremin G.B.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.