Hygienic assessment of lifestyle, work pressure and regime, health status and psychological well-being in teachers
- Authors: Kuchma V.R.1,2, Sokolova S.B.1, Rapoport I.K.1, Chubarovsky V.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
- Issue: Vol 102, No 4 (2023)
- Pages: 318-327
- Section: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
- Published: 29.05.2023
- URL: https://ruspoj.com/0016-9900/article/view/638575
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-4-318-327
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/yruqkx
- ID: 638575
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. The state of health in students in schools is directly dependent on the state of health and psycho-emotional well-being in teachers.
The purpose of the study: to substantiate the algorithm for assessing the provision of favourable conditions for the professional activities of schoolteachers based on an analysis of the lifestyle, work intensity and work regime, the state of health and psychological well-being in teachers.
Materials and methods. The object of the study were teachers, tools for assessing the health promoting activities of schools. Surveys of lifestyle, work management, psychological status in teachers, medical examinations were conducted; analysis of tools for assessing the health promoting activities of schools.
Results. Teachers are mostly women aged 30 to 59 years, with an average teaching experience of 23 years, have favourable family and living conditions. The optimal intensity of the teacher’s activity was found in 3.3%, acceptable – in 76.7%, tense of the 1st degree (harmful) – in 20.0%. 74.1% of teachers had a high level of occupatonal stress. Most teachers care little for their health. The leading behavioural risk factors for teachers are irrational unbalanced nutrition, irrational management of work and rest, low physical activity.
Limitations. The use of a complex of research methods was one of the strengths of the study, which made it possible to identify potential factors affecting the health of teachers and develop an algorithm for assessing the provision of favourable conditions for the professional activities of schoolteachers. The program of an in-depth examination with the determination of the state of health and psychological status included only primary school teachers in Moscow, so the results of the study may vary depending on the place of residence (region) and personal characteristics, but can be generalized in relation to persons with similar background characteristics and conditions.
Conclusion. Modern professional risk factors for the health of teachers are determined. For the first time, indicators and an algorithm for assessing the provision of favourable conditions for the professional activity of schoolteachers are proposed.
Compliance with ethical standards. Research involving schoolteachers was done on a voluntary basis, with sufficient information available to be understood, in compliance with the ethical standards set out in the Declaration of Helsinki, the international ethical guidelines for conducting biomedical research on humans.
Patient consent. Each participant of the study gave informed voluntary written consent to participate in the study and publish personal medical information in an impersonal form in the journal “Gigiena i Sanitariya (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal)”.
Contribution:
Kuchma V.R. — the concept and design of the study, editing;
Sokolova S.B. — the concept and design of the study, collection and processing of material, statistical processing, writing a text;
Rapoport I.K. — collection and processing of material, editing;
Chubarovsky V.V. — collection and processing of material, editing.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.
Received: January 24, 2023 / Accepted: March 24, 2023 / Published: May 29, 2023
About the authors
Vladislav R. Kuchma
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing; Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1410-5546
Russian Federation
Svetlana B. Sokolova
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: sokolovasb@fferisman.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5895-4577
MD, PhD, DSci, Leading Researcher of the Department of Hygiene for Children, Adolescents and Youth, Institute of Complex Hygiene Problems of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing, 141014, Mytishchi, Russian Federation.
e-mail: sokolovasb@fferisman.ru
Russian FederationIrina K. Rapoport
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9989-4491
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Chubarovsky
Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman of the Federal Service for Supervision in Protection of the Rights of Consumer and Man Wellbeing
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4587-4791
Russian Federation
References
- Ganuzin V.М. Bulling, didactogenia and pedagogical violence syndrome in domestic and foreign studies. Voprosy psikhicheskogo zdorov’ya detey i podrostkov. 2020; 20(4): 106–14. https://elibrary.ru/ylmvwa (in Russian)
- Roslyne W.H., Jones B.A. Antisocial behaviour and teacher-student relationship quality: The role of emotion-related abilities and callous-unemotional traits. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2021; 91(1): 482–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12376
- Virabova A.R., Shklyarova O.A., Podduba S.G. Professional and personal health of pedagogical workers as a factor of success of educational organization. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie i nauka. 2020; (1): 23–8. https://elibrary.ru/rpdlcu (in Russian)
- Mitina L.M. Personal and Professional Development of a Teacher: Strategies, Resources, Risks [Lichnostno-professional’noe razvitie uchitelya: strategii, resursy, riski]. St. Peterburg: Nestor-Istoriya; 2018. (in Russian)
- Brütting J., Druschke D., Spitzer S., Seibt R. Health status of long-term sick leave and working female teachers in Germany: A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 2018; 31(2): 227–42. https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01115
- Boström M., Björklund C., Bergström G., Nybergh L., Schäfer Elinder L., Stigmar K., et al. Health and work environment among female and male Swedish elementary school teachers-a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019; 17(1): 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17010227
- Woynarowska-Sołdan M. Implementation trial of school staff health promotion: Polish experiences. Health Promot. Int. 2019; 34(5): e47–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day068
- Stachteas P., Stachteas C. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on secondary school teachers. Psychiatriki. 2020; 31(4): 293–301. https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2020.314.293
- Kim L.E., Oxley L., Asbury K. “My brain feels like a browser with 100 tabs open”: A longitudinal study of teachers’ mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 2022; 92(1): 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12450
- Dadaczynski K., Jensen B.B., Viig N.G., Sormunen M., Kuchma V.R., Vilaga M.T. Health, well-being and education: building a sustainable future. The Moscow statement on health promoting schools. Voprosy shkol’noy i universitetskoy meditsiny i zdorov’ya. 2020; (1): 56–61. https://elibrary.ru/dupgnc (in Russian)
- Gorblyanskiy Yu.Yu., Ponamareva O.P., Kontorovich E.P., Volynskaya E.I. Modern concepts оf professional burnout in occupational medicine. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2020; 60(4): 244–9. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-4-244-249 https://elibrary.ru/lcmbju (in Russian)
- Ainley J., Carstens R. Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.
- Narkevich A.N., Vinogradov K.A. Methods for determining the minimum required sample size in medical research. Sotsial’nye aspekty zdorov’ya naseleniya. 2019; 65(6): 10. https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2019-65-6-10 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/mrapst (in Russian)
- Sokolova S.B. A model for creating a common health promoting school environment. Zdorov’e naseleniya i sreda obitaniya – ZNiSO. 2021; 29(10): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.35627/2219-5238/2021-29-10-12-21 https://www.elibrary.ru/qakndw (in Russian)
- Welsh Network of Healthy School Schemes. Indicators for the Welsh Network of Healthy School Schemes National Quality Award; 2010. Available at: https://www.publichealthnetwork.cymru/en/social-determinants/education/welsh-network-of-healthy-school-schemes-wnhss/
- Lee A., St Leger L.H., Ling K.W., Keung V.M., Lo A.S., Kwong A.C., et al. The Hong Kong Healthy Schools Award Scheme, school health and student health: An exploratory study. Health Educ. J. 2018; 77(8): 857–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896918779622
- SHE rapid assessment tool; 2013. Available at: https://www.schoolsforhealth.org/resources/materials-and-tools/how-be-health-promoting-school/rapid-assessment-tool
- FRESH consortium. Monitoring and Evaluation Guidance for School Health Programs Thematic Indicators Supporting FRESH (Focusing Resources on Effective School Health); 2014. Available at: https://healtheducationresources.unesco.org/library/documents/monitoring-and-evaluation-guidance-school-health-programs-eight-core-indicators
- CDC American national Health Education Standards; 2018. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/sher/standards/index.htm
- Bada E., Darlington E., Masson J., Santos R.M. European Standards and Indicators for Health Promoting Schools (version 1.1); 2019. Available at: https://www.schoolsforhealth.org/resources/materials-and-tools/teachers-resources
- WHO, UNESCO. Making every school a health-promoting school: global standards and indicators for health-promoting schools and systems. Geneva; 2021. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025059
- Bezrukikh M.M., Son’kina V.D., eds. Organization and Evaluation of Health-Saving Activities of Educational Institutions: A Guide for Employees of the General Education System [Organizatsiya i otsenka zdorov’esberegayushchey deyatel’nosti obrazovatel’nykh uchrezhdeniy: Rukovodstvo dlya rabotnikov sistemy obshchego obrazovaniya]. Moscow; 2004. (in Russian)
- Kuchma V.R., ed. Health Schools in Russia: Principles and Organization of Work. Monitoring Development and Performance [Shkoly zdorov’ya v Rossii: printsipy i organizatsiya raboty. Monitoring razvitiya i effektivnosti]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie; 2010. (in Russian)
- Nazarova O.M., Petelina V.A. Requirements for the office of psychological unloading, and its role in the psychological rehabilitation of the personnel of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia. Molodoy uchenyy. 2016; (27): 794–6. https://www.elibrary.ru/xeogph (in Russian)
- Pecherkina A.A., Sinyakova M.G., Churakova N.I. Professional Health of the Teacher: Manual [Professional’noe zdorov’e pedagoga: uchebnoe posobie]. Moscow: Yurayt; 2018. (in Russian)
- Zheglova A.V., Lapko I.V., Bogatyreva I.A. Comprehensive assessment of risk factors for professional burnout of teachers of secondary schools. In: Health risk analysis – 2021. Environmental, Social, Medical and Behavioral Aspects of XI All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation [Analiz riska zdorov’yu – 2021. Vneshnesredovye, sotsial’nye, meditsinskie i povedencheskie aspekty. Materialy XI Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem]. Perm’; 2021: 142–8. https://www.elibrary.ru/whzubo (in Russian)
- Araújo T.M., Pinho P.S., Masson M.L.V. Teachers’ work and health in Brazil: thoughts on the history of research, strides, and challenges. Cad. Saude Publica. 2019; 35(Suppl. 1): e00087318. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00087318
- Milushkina O.Yu., Eremin A.L., Popov V.I., Skoblina N.A., Markelova S.V., Sokolova N.V., et al. Hygienic assessment and optimization of working conditions for teachers during distance learning. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2020; 60(7): 424–34. https://doi.org/10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-7-424-434 https://www.elibrary.ru/zjtakx (in Russian)
- Bagnetova E.A. Lifestyle and Professional Risk Factors for the Health of a Teacher [Obraz zhizni i professional’nye faktory riska zdorov’yu pedagoga]. Moscow: INFRA-M; 2019. (in Russian)
- Watanabe K., Tabuchi T., Kawakami N. Improvement of the work environment and work-related stress: a cross-sectional multilevel study of a nationally representative sample of Japanese workers. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2017; 59(3): 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000000950
- Vodop’yanova N.E., Starchenkova E.S. Burnout Syndrome. Diagnosis and Prevention [Sindrom vygoraniya. Diagnostika i profilaktika]. Moscow: Yurayt; 2021. (in Russian)
Supplementary files
