Age-related vulnerability of employees to factors of the occupation environment
- Authors: Sorokin G.A.1, Chistyakov N.D.1, Shilov V.V.2
-
Affiliations:
- North-West Public Health Research Center
- North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
- Issue: Vol 100, No 8 (2021)
- Pages: 807-811
- Section: OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
- Published: 31.08.2021
- URL: https://ruspoj.com/0016-9900/article/view/639069
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2021-100-8-807-811
- ID: 639069
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
Introduction. When predicting individual health risks associated with a person’s profession, first of all, the state of their health, age and experience of harmful work are studied. A practical approach to studying the age-related vulnerability of a person to the factors of the working environment is the use of fatigue indicators.
Objective: to establish age-related patterns of the influence of factors of the occupation environment on employee fatigue
Materials and methods. Three thousand eight hundred fifty-one employees of industrial enterprises, public catering enterprises, healthcare and educational organizations were examined. The employees evaluated the degree of influence of factors of the production environment on fatigue – noise, microclimate, working area air, dust in the working area air, vibration. The frequency of influence (FI) of each factor of the production environment on employee fatigue was considered an indicator of age-related vulnerability (vulnerability risk). The relative risk of exceeding the FI in older age groups of employees was calculated.
Results. In older medical workers, the relative risk (RR) of vulnerability to noise was =1.19 (0.88-1.60); to the microclimate OR=1.26 (0.96-1.64); RR due to the air of the working area =1.19 (0.92-1.54). School teachers have a significantly higher frequency of complaints about noise than doctors and nurses, and their age-related increase in vulnerability to noise was OR=1.23 (0.98-1.55). Employees of public catering enterprises showed an increase in age-related vulnerability to all environmental factors. Employees of older age groups of industrial enterprises are more vulnerable to all factors of the production environment. The values of FI in the groups of 30-49 years and 50-69 years, respectively, were: for noise, OR=1.20 (1.01-1.43) and OR=1.15(0.88-1.50); for microclimate, OR=1.21(1.04-1.39); for working area air, OR=1.02 (0.87-1.19) and OR = 1.31 (1.06-1.62).
Conclusion. Compared with the age group of 20-30 years, the probability of the influence of factors of the working environment – “noise”, “microclimate”, “air of the working area”, on the fatigue of workers increases by 10-15% at the age of 30-49 years and by 15-25% at the age of 50-60 years.
Contribution:
Sorokin G.A. — the concept and design of the study, responsibility for the integrity of all parts of the article, collection of literature data, statistical processing, text writing;
Shilov V.V. — editing;
Chistyakov N.D. — collection and processing of observation materials.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgment. The study had no sponsorship.
About the authors
Gennady A. Sorokin
North-West Public Health Research Center
Author for correspondence.
Email: sorgen50@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1297-5476
MD, PhD, DSci., senior researcher, Department of Population Health Risks Analysis, North-West Public Health Research Center, Saint-Petersburg, 191036, Russian Federation.
e-mail: sorgen50@mail.ru
Russian FederationNikolay D. Chistyakov
North-West Public Health Research Center
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation
Viktor V. Shilov
North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Russian Federation
References
- Aging and Working Capacity. Report of a WHO Study Group; 1993.
- Trakhtenberg I.M., Polyakov A.A. Essays on physiology and occupational hygiene of the elderly [Ocherki fiziologii i gigieny truda pozhilogo cheloveka]. Kiev: Izdatel’skiy dom «Avitsenna», 2007. (in Russian)
- Sorokin G.A., Kir’yanova M.N. Occupational health risk factors in integrated microcircuit production. Zdorov’e – osnova chelovecheskogo potentsiala: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. 2020; 15(1): 447–56. (in Russian)
- Namdeo A., Tiwary A., Farrow E. Estimation of age-related vulnerability to air pollution: assessment of respiratory health at local scale. Environ. Int. 2011; 37(5): 829–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.002
- Simoni M., Baldacci S., Maio S., Cerrai S., Sarno G., Viegi G. Adverse effects of outdoor pollution in the elderly. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015; 7(1): 34–45. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.12.10
- Chen K., Vicedo-Cabrera A.M., Dubrow R. Projections of ambient temperature- and air pollution-related mortality burden under combined climate change and population aging scenarios: a review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2020; 7(3): 243–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-020-00281-6
- Meade R.D., Akerman A.P., Notley S.R., McGinn R., Poirier P., Gosselin P., et al. Physiological factors characterizing heat-vulnerable older adults: A narrative review. Environ. Int. 2020; 144: 105909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105909
- Serdyuk V.S., Dobrenko A.M., Tsorina O.A., Bakiko E.V., Utyuganova V.V. Definition of Individual Occupational Risk: a Textbook [Opredelenie individual’nogo professional’nogo riska: uchebnoe posobie]. Omsk; 2016. (in Russian)
- Prokopenko L.V., Simonova N.I., Izmerova N.I., Kuz’mina T.P., Tikhonova G.I., Denisov E.I., et al. Development of «Methods for calculating individual occupational risk depending on the working conditions and health status of the employee» and «Methods for calculating the integral indicator of the level of occupational risk in the organization». In: Izmerov N.F., ed. Collection of Works «Actual Problems of Occupational Medicine» [Sbornik trudov «Aktual’nye problemy meditsiny truda»]. Moscow: Reinfor; 2014: 132–62. (in Russian)
- Stezhenskaya E.I. Gerogigien of Labor. Guide to Gerontology [Gerogigiena truda. Rukovodstvo po gerontologii]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1978: 444–60. (in Russian)
- Sorokin G.A. The age and work experience dynamics of indices of health of employees as criteria for comparison of occupational and nonoccupational risks. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2016; 95(4): 355–61. https://doi.org/10.18821/0016-9900-2016-95-4-355-360 (in Russian)
- Methodological recommendations. Medical and physiological classification of work by severity. Moscow; 1974. (in Russian)
- Express Method of Quantitative Hygienic Assessment of Women’s Working Conditions. Handbook for Doctors [Ekspress-metod kolichestvennoy gigienicheskoy otsenki usloviy truda zhenshchin. Posobie dlya vrachey]. St. Petersburg; 1999. (in Russian)
- R 2.2.2006-05. Guidelines for the hygienic assessment of factors of the working environment and the labor process. Criteria and classification of working conditions. Moscow; 2005. (in Russian)
- Sorokin G.A., Chistyakov N.D., Suslov V.L. Influence of fatigue and overwork on the general morbidity of workers. Meditsina truda i promyshlennaya ekologiya. 2019; 59(8): 494–500. (in Russian)
Supplementary files
