Health risk to the population in Norilsk under exposure of substances polluting ambient air

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. The city of Norilsk is included in the list of cities participating in the federal project “Clean Air.” The comprehensive action plan for protecting atmospheric air of substances provides a 75% reduction in emissions and a decrease in the level of pollution from “very high” to “high”. 

The aim of the study was to assess human health risk from chemicals that pollute the atmospheric air of the city of Norilsk before the implementation of a complex of air protection measures. Also, we planned to identify priority factors and sources of risk. 

Material and methods. The assessment of carcinogenic, acute, and chronic non-carcinogenic health risks was carried out at 1105 points of location of residential buildings in the city based on summary calculations of dispersion. The database of parameters of 2145 sources of pollutant emissions into the atmospheric air of the city was used. 

Results. Unacceptable, including high levels of risk to the health of citizens, have been established to be registered throughout the city. More than 181.8 thousand people live in high-risk zones. Risks occur both during short-term and long-term exposure to atmospheric pollution. The risk indicators for respiratory disorders diseases of the immune system and the blood system are ten or more times higher than the acceptable levels. There have been eleven priority pollutants contributing up to 90% to unacceptable risks (nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, copper, nickel, lead oxides, the sum of various types of industrial dust, etc.).  

Conclusion. In general, aerogenic health risks require urgent measures to reduce them. The planned measures to suppress sulfur dioxide emissions, nitrogen oxides, and dust in Norilsk are generally large-scale and adequate to the priority risk factors. At the same time, it is necessary to develop and implement measures to reduce emissions of heavy metal compounds. Until the levels of acceptable health risk are reached, measures of a medical and prophylactic nature are relevant as compensation measures provided for by current legislation.

About the authors

Irina V. May

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Author for correspondence.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0976-7016
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Kleyn

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2534-5713
Russian Federation

Svetlana A. Vekovshinina

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: veksa@fcrisk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4833-0792

Head of the laboratory of Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, Perm,
614045, Russian Federation.

e-mail: veksa@fcrisk.ru

Russian Federation

Stanislav Yu. Balashov

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6923-0539
Russian Federation

Kristina V. Chetverkina

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1548-228X
Russian Federation

Mihail Yu. Tsinker

Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2639-5368
Russian Federation

References

  1. The state report of the Ministry of Ecology and Rational Nature Management of the Krasnoyarsk Territory «On the state and protection of the environment in the Krasnoyarsk Territory for 2019». Available at: https://www.mpr.krskstate.ru/envir/page5849/0/id/45884 (in Russian)
  2. The state report of the Ministry of Ecology and Rational Nature Management of the Krasnoyarsk Territory «On the state and protection of the environment in the Krasnoyarsk Territory for 2018». Available at: https://www.mpr.krskstate.ru/envir/page5849/0/id/39742 (in Russian)
  3. The state report of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of Russia «On the state and protection of the environment of the Russian Federation in 2019». Available at: https://www.mnr.gov.ru/docs/gosudarstvennye_doklady/proekt_gosudarstvennogo_doklada_o_sostoyanii_i_ob_okhrane_okruzhayushchey_sredy_rossiyskoy_federat2019/ (in Russian)
  4. Lobkovskiy V.A., Lobkovskaya L.G. The ecological situation around the arrangement of the enterprises of the polar branch of the MMC Norilsk Nickel: current state and forecast. Problemy regional’noy ekologii. 2015; (5): 40–3. (in Russian)
  5. Revich B.A., Khar’kova T.L., Kvasha E.A. Selected health parameters of people living in cities included into «Pure air» Federal Project. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2020; (2): 16–27. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2020.2.02.eng (in Russian)
  6. Karasev V.V., Dettsel’ A.E., Shtarik V.A., Dykhno Yu.A. Morbidity with lung cancer among population living in Norilsk industrial region. Voprosy onkologii. 1992; 38(11): 1340–4. (in Russian)
  7. Ananina O.A., Pisareva V.F., Odintsova I.N., Khristenko E.L., Popkova G.A., Khristenko I.D. Cancer incidence among population of Norilsk. Formation of high risk groups for cancer. Sibirskiy onkologicheskiy zhurnal. 2013; (4): 58–61. (in Russian)
  8. Rudskiy V.V. Criteria for the assessment of negative influence of mining on the environment. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya. 2013; (10): 802–6. (in Russian)
  9. Revich B.A. Is «Pure air» project truly effective for improvement of population health in 12 cities? Ekologicheskiy vestnik Rossii. 2020; (3): 58–68. (in Russian)
  10. Popova A.Yu., Zaytseva N.V., May I.V. Population health as a target function and criterion for assessing efficiency of activities performed within “pure air” federal project. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2019; (4): 4–13. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2019.4.01.eng (in Russian)
  11. Avaliani S.L., Shashina T.A., Dodina N.S., Kislitsin V.A., Mityagina A.V., Pogonina T.A. Experience and prospects of using health risk analysis in the implementation of the federal project «Clean Air» to ensure the sanitary and epidemiological well-being of the population. In: Popova A.Yu., Zaytseva N.V., eds. Materials of the X All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation «Health Risk Analysis 2020 Jointed with International Meeting on Environment and Health RISE 2020 and Food Safety Roundtable» [Materialy X Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Analiz riska zdorov’yu – 2020 sovmestno s mezhdunarodnoy vstrechey po okruzhayushchey srede i zdorov’yu Rise-2020 i kruglym stolom po bezopasnosti pitaniya»]. Perm’; 2020: 231–9. (in Russian)
  12. Karelin A.O., Lomtev A.Yu., Volkodaeva M.V., Eremin G.B. The improvement of approaches to the assessment of effects of the anthropogenic air pollution on the population in order to management the risk for health. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2019; 98(1): 82–6. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2019-98-1-82-86 (in Russian)
  13. Rakitskiy V.N., Avaliani S.L., Novikov S.M., Shashina T.A., Dodina N.S., Kislitsin V.A. Health risk analysis related to exposure to ambuent air contamination as a component in the strategy aimed at reducing global non-infectious epidemics. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2019; (4): 30–6. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2019.4.03.eng (in Russian)
  14. Brunekreef B. Environmental epidemiology and risk assessment. Toxicol. Lett. 2008; 180(2): 118–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.012
  15. Academy of Medical Sciences Official Website. An Academy of Medical Sciences working group report chaired by Sir Michael Rutter CBE FRS FBA FMedSci «Identifying the environmental cause of disease: how should we decide what to believe and when to take action?» Available at: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/34586-A5WebRea.pdf
  16. O’Donnell M.J., Chin S.L., Rangarajan S., Xavier D., Liu L., Zhang H., et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study. Lancet. 2016; 388(10046): 761–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30506-2
  17. Li N., Wang M., Bramble L.A., Schmitz D.A. The adjuvant effect of ambient particulate matter is closely reflected by the particulate oxidant potential. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009; 117(7): 1116–23. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800319
  18. Petrov S.B., Petrov B.A., Tsapok P.I., Sheshunova T.I. Research of biological action flying ashes in structure of dust-gas mixture. Ekologiya cheloveka. 2009; (12): 13–6. (in Russian)
  19. Sørensen M., Daneshvar B., Hansen M., Dragsted L.O., Hertel O., Knudsen L., et al. Personal PM2,5 exposure and markers of oxidative stress in blood. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003; 111(2): 161–6. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.5646
  20. Zagorodnov S.Yu. Dust contamination of the atmospheric air of the city as an undervalued risk factor to human health. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Prikladnaya ekologiya. Urbanistika. 2018; (2): 124–33. https://doi.org/10.15593/2409-5125/2018.02.10 (in Russian)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 May I.V., Kleyn S.V., Vekovshinina S.A., Balashov S.Y., Chetverkina K.V., Tsinker M.Y.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.