The effect of the antibiotic tetracycline hydrochloride on the biotransformation of urea when exposed to soil nitrifying strains

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. The consequences of uncontrolled use of antibiotics in agriculture are an urgent problem of environmental hygiene. Tetracycline can enter the soil with the urine of domestic animals, inhibit the vital activity of soil bacterial strains and inhibit the processes of enzymatic hydrolysis of urea (carbamide), disrupting the global nitrogen cycle in nature. The lack of both quantitative and qualitative criteria for assessing this influence determined the relevance of the research.

Materials and methods. The studies were carried out using the “Stayer” chromatographic system with cationic and anionic separating columns and exclusive analysis methods developed by the authors. When modelling solutions of heavy metals, an atomic absorption spectrometer МГА-915МД with ЭTA was used. The objects of research were model solutions of carbamide with different content of inhibiting substances. As a source of urease and strains of Nitrobacter and Nitrosomonas, sod-podzolic soil from the Educational and Experimental Soil-Ecological Center “Chashnikovo” of Lomonosov Moscow State University was used.

Results. An improved, more rapid chromatographic method for the analysis of urea in water is proposed compared to the method described by the authors earlier. The inhibitory effect of the antibiotic tetracycline hydrochloride on the process of biotransformation of nitrite into nitrate caused by Nitrobacter strains has been shown. No significant effect of the antibiotic on the biotransformation of urea into ammonium and ammonium into nitrite under the action of Nitrosomonas strains has been established.

Limitations. The studies were carried out on the model of water systems, which included an aqueous phase containing different concentrations of the antibiotic, soil suspension, urea, heavy metal ions at a temperature of t = 30 °C, pH ~ 6.5. The influence of salt background, pH, and temperature on biotransformation has not been studied, which could, without changing the overall picture, reveal nuances in the kinetics of the main processes.

Conclusion. Studies have shown the absence of the effect of the antibiotic tetracycline hydrochloride on the kinetics of the decomposition of urea to ammonium and carbon dioxide due to urease enzymatic activity; there is no effect of the antibiotic on the oxidation of ammonium to nitrites by Nitrosomonas strains. It was found: selective inhibitory effect of an antibiotic during the oxidation of nitrite to nitrate, due to Nitrobacter strains; inhibition of biotransformation processes by chromium ions along the entire chain of transformations from urea to nitrate; and the inhibitory effect of excess oxygen on the totality of biotransformation processes during air bubbling through the aqueous phase.

Contribution:
Abramov E.G. — collection and processing of material, statistical processing, writing text, research concept, editing.
Antropova N.S. — collecting and processing material, writing text.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.

Gratitude. The authors express their gratitude to A.V. Zagainova and the staff of the Microbiology laboratory of the FSBI "CSP" of the FMBA of Russia for their assistance in conducting experiments.

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.

Received: March 16, 2022 / Accepted: April 12, 2022 / Published: May 31, 2022

About the authors

Evgeny G. Abramov

Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Biological and Medical Agency

Author for correspondence.
Email: eabramov@cspmz.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9611-8430

Науч. сотр. отд. физико-химических исследований и экотоксикологии ФГБУ «ЦСП» ФМБА России, 119121, Москва.

e-mail: EAbramov@cspmz.ru

Russian Federation

Natalia S. Antropova

Center for Strategic Planning and Management of Biomedical Health Risks of the Federal Biological and Medical Agency

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9311-9910
Russian Federation

References

  1. Akimenko Yu.V., Kazeev K.Sh., Kolesnikov S.I., Minnikova T.V. Estimation the soil ecological functions sustainability to antibiotic pollution. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. 2017; 19(2–2): 207–10. (in Russian)
  2. Miroshnikova M.S., Miroshnikova E.P., Arinzhanov A.E., Kilyakova Yu.V. Application of antibiotics in agriculture and alternatives of their use. Agrarnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2021; (5): 65–70. https://doi.org/10.28983/asj.y2021i5pp65-70 (in Russian)
  3. Navashin S.M., Fomina I.P. Handbook of Antibiotics [Spravochnik po antibiotikam]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1974. (in Russian)
  4. Donkova N.V., Donkov S.A., Kadetova M.Yu. Studying the stability to antibiotics of bacteria of the genus bacillus by serial breeding method. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2019; (3): 71–8. (in Russian)
  5. Shao L., You C., Cao J., Jiang Y., Liu Y., Liu Q. High treatment failure rate is better explained by resistance gene detection than by minimum inhibitory concentration in patients with urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020; 96: 121–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.015
  6. Oliveira L., Langoni H., Hulland C., Ruegg P.L. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from clinical and subclinical cases of bovine mastitis. J. Dairy. Sci. 2012; 95(4): 1913–20. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4938
  7. Kappaun K., Piovesan A.R., Carlini C.R., Ligabue-Braun R. Ureases: historical aspects, catalytic, and non-catalytic properties – A review. J. Adv. Res. 2018; 13: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2018.05.010
  8. Zabelina O.N. Enzymatic activity of recreational landscapes soil in urban areas. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014; (2): 493. (in Russian)
  9. Svirskene A. Microbiological and biochemical indicators of anthropogenic impacts on soils. Pochvovedenie. 2003; (2): 202–10. (in Russian)
  10. Shvakova E.V. Changes in urease activity with high content of heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Cu) in the soil. Arctic Environmental Research. 2013; (2): 202–10. (in Russian)
  11. Qin S., Hu C., Dong W. Nitrification result in underestimation of soil urease activity as determined by ammonium production rate. Pedobiologia. 2010; 53(6): 401–4.
  12. Chernikova V.A., Chekeresa A.I. Agroecology [Agroekologiya]. Moscow; 2000. (in Russian)
  13. Gizzatova G.L., Shipaeva T.A. Urease – a key enzyme in the biodegradation of urea. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy zhurnal. 2016; (3–3): 88–90. https://doi.org/10.18454/IRJ.2016.45.175 (in Russian)
  14. Ryzhakov A.V., Kukkonen N.A. Urea in water bodies of the humid zone. Ekologicheskaya khimiya. 2014; 23(1): 44–8. (in Russian)
  15. Sharavev P.V., Neverova O.P., Il’yasov O.R., Shkuratova I.A. Bioindication of aquatic ecosystems in the poultry farms. Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2013; (4): 67–9. (in Russian)
  16. Karrer P. Course of Organic Chemistry [Kurs organicheskoy khimii]. Leningrad; 1962. (in Russian)
  17. Fedotov G.N., Neklyudov A.D., Gorshkova A.V., Pakhomov E.I., Pozdnyakov A.I. Method for determining the rate of urea hydrolysis by urease in soils. Patent RF No. 2236004 C1; 2004. (in Russian)
  18. Pakhota A.A., Fedorenko E.S., Krepakova M.R. Changes in urease activity during artificial soil pollution and the introduction of biochar. In: Fundamental Foundations of Biogeochemical Technologies and Prospects for their Application in Nature Conservation, Agriculture and Medicine. Proceedings of the XII International Biogeochemical School Dedicated to the 175th Anniversary of the Birth of V.V. Dokuchaev [Fundamental’nye osnovy biogeokhimicheskikh tekhnologiy i perspektivy ikh primeneniya v okhrane prirody, sel’skom khozyaystve i meditsine. Trudy KhII Mezhdunarodnoy biogeokhimicheskoy shkoly, posvyashchennoy 175-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V.V. Dokuchaeva]. Tula; 2021: 163–6. (in Russian)
  19. Nicolle A., Cagnina S., de Bruin T. First-principle based modeling of urea decomposition kinetics in aqueous solutions. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016; 664: 149–53.
  20. Avdeenkov P.P., Chistyakov N.E. Biochemical mechanism of ammonification. In: Proceedings of the XXII Scientific and Practical Conference «Russian Science in the Modern World» [Sbornik trudov KhKhII nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Rossiyskaya nauka v sovremennom mire»]. Moscow; 2019: 16–7. (in Russian)
  21. Sonthiphand P., Neufeld J.D. Nitrifying bacteria mediate aerobic ammonia oxidation and urea hydrolysis within the Grand River. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2014; 73(2): 151–62.
  22. Abramov E.G., Malysheva A.G. Biotransformation of urea in the water of water bodies. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2022; 101(1): 21–9. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2022-101-1-21-29 (in Russian)
  23. Abramov E.G., Malysheva A.G. Ionic chromatographic determination of iodides, nitrites and bivalent iron in water with amperometric detector. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2020; 99(11): 1307–12. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2020-99-11-1288-1293 (in Russian)
  24. Nikolskiy B.P. Handbook of a Chemist in 6 Volumes. Volume 3 [Spravochnik khimika v 6 tomakh. Tom 3]. Moscow: Leningrad; 1964. (in Russian)
  25. Skitovich G.S., Shadrova N.B., Pruntova O.V., Serova K.B., Shmaykhel S.E. Identification and antimicrobial resistance of salmonella isolates. Veterinariya segodnya. 2018; (4): 3–11. https://doi.org/10.29326/2304-196X-2018-4-27-3-7 (in Russian)
  26. Stetsyuk O.U., Reshed’ko G.K. Comparison of the results of determining the sensitivity to antibiotics of gram-negative aerobic bacteria by the disk-diffusion method on AGV medium and Muller-Hinton agar. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya khimioterapiya. 2004; 6(2): 155–67. (in Russian)
  27. Nakagawa T., Takahashi R. Nitrosomonas stercoris sp. nov., a chemoautotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacterium tolerant of high ammonium isolated from composted cattle manure. Microbes Environ. 2015; 30(3): 221–7. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.me15072
  28. Grunditz C., Dalhammar G. Development of nitrification inhibition assays using pure cultures of Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter. Water Res. 2001; 35(2): 433–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00312-2
  29. Kirstein K., Bock E. Close genetic relationship between Nitrobacter hamburgensis nitrite oxidoreductase and Escherichia coli nitrate reductases. Arch. Microbiol. 1993; 160(6): 447–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00245305
  30. Yool A., Martin A.P., Fernández C., Clark D.R. The significance of nitrification for oceanic new production. Nature. 2007; 447(7147): 999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05885

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Abramov E.G., Antropova N.S.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.