On the safe levels of micro-sized particles PM1.0 in ambient air
- Authors: Zaitseva N.V.1, Kleyn S.V.1,2, Chetverkina K.V.1,2, Andrishunas A.M.1, Tsinker M.Y.1,3
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
- Academician E.A. Vagner’s Perm State Medical University of the RF Ministry of Health
- Perm National Research Polytechnic University
- Issue: Vol 103, No 11 (2024)
- Pages: 1434-1440
- Section: HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
- Published: 15.12.2024
- URL: https://ruspoj.com/0016-9900/article/view/646129
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2024-103-11-1434-1440
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/hipitl
- ID: 646129
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. Micro- and nano-sized suspended particles may be toxic to humans more than larger particles. Effects of these particles can cause diseases of the respiratory, cardiovascular, endocrine and immune system, etc. There are no safety standards for micro-sized particles PM1.0 at present in the Russian Federation.
The aim of this work is scientific substantiation of the safe level of micro-sized suspended particles PM1.0 in ambient air.
Materials and methods. Safe PM1.0 levels in ambient air upon long-term inhalation intake were established on the base of selecting previously conducted relevant studies and assessment of the quantitative and qualitative data (assessment of study design elements, exposure levels, adverse health responses (effects), etc.) provided in them. In key studies ‘point of departure’ for exposure was established most relevant for substantiating safe PM1.0 levels; these levels were then calculated considering use of the total (complex) modifying factor.
Results. Out of sixty eight publications reported the results obtained in studies with their focus on effects of PM1.0 on the health, two key studies were selected for the procedure for justifying the value of the PM1.0 safe level in ambient air, namely, Zhang et al., 2021 and Yu et al., 2020. The safe level for PM1.0 upon chronic inhalation exposure is scientifically substantiated at 0.002 mg/m3 based on establishing the values of modifying factors and calculating the total (complex) modifying factor.
Limitations. The study does not provide any toxicological results.
Conclusion. The proposed safe PM1.0 level in ambient air (0.002 mg/m3) has the potential for practical application in the health risk assessment as a reference concentration, as well as for use in the system for sanitary and hygienic regulation.
Compliance with ethical standards. The study did not require the opinion of a biomedical ethics committee (the study was performed on publicly available data).
Contribution:
Zaitseva N.V. — the study concept, organization and implementation of a full-scale experiment, editing;
Kleyn S.V. — the study concept and design, writing the text, and editing;
Chetverkina K.V. — design of the study, collection, and processing of material, writing the text;
Andrishunas A.M., Tsinker M.Yu. — collection, and processing of material, writing the text.
All authors are responsible for the integrity of all parts of the manuscript and approval of the manuscript final version.
Conflict of interest. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement. The study had no sponsorship.
Received: Auugust 13, 2024 / Accepted: November 19, 2024 / Published: December 17, 2024
About the authors
Nina V. Zaitseva
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Email: znv@fcrisk.ru
DSc (Medicine), Professor, Academician of the RAS, Scientific Director of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, 614045, Perm, Russian Federation
e-mail: znv@fcrisk.ru
Svetlana V. Kleyn
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies; Academician E.A. Vagner’s Perm State Medical University of the RF Ministry of Health
Email: kleyn@fcrisk.ru
DSc (Medicine), Professor of the RAS, Chief Researcher – Head of the Department of Sanitary and Hygienic Analysis and Monitoring Systemic Methods of the Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation; Academician E.A. Vagner’s Perm State Medical University, Perm, 614990, Russian Federation
e-mail: kleyn@fcrisk.ru
Kristina V. Chetverkina
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies; Academician E.A. Vagner’s Perm State Medical University of the RF Ministry of Health
Email: chetverkina@fcrisk.ru
PhD (Medicine), Leading Researcher at the Department for Systemic Procedures of Sanitary-Hygienic Analysis and Monitoring, Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation; Academician E.A. Vagner’s Perm State Medical University, Perm, 614990, Russian Federation
e-mail: chetverkina@fcrisk.ru
Alena M. Andrishunas
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies
Email: ama@fcrisk.ru
Researcher at the Department for Systemic Procedures of Sanitary-Hygienic Analysis and Monitoring, Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation
e-mail: ama@fcrisk.ru
Mikhail Yu. Tsinker
Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies; Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Author for correspondence.
Email: cinker@fcrisk.ru
Junior researcher at the Department of the Mathematical Modelling of Systems and Processes, Federal Scientific Center for Medical and Preventive Health Risk Management Technologies, Perm, 614045, Russian Federation; Perm National Research Polytechnic University, Perm, 614990, Perm, Russian Federation
e-mail: cinker@fcrisk.ru
References
- GBD 2019 Chronic Respiratory Diseases Collaborators. Global burden of chronic respiratory diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: an update from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 59: 101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101936
- Outdoor Air Pollution. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2016; (109). Available at: https://publications.iarc.fr/_publications/media/download/6728/2a4781ab99e984d14088ff21d09c3524dc26f6ee.pdf
- Jia H., Liu Y., Guo D., He W., Zhao L., Xia S. PM2.5-induced pulmonary inflammation via activating of the NLRP3/caspase-1 signaling pathway. Environ. Toxicol. 2021; 36(3): 298–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.23035
- Kowalska M., Zejda J.E. Relationship between PM2.5 concentration in the ambient air and daily exacerbation of respiratory diseases in the population of Silesian voivodeship during winter smog. Med. Pr. 2018; 69(5): 523–30. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.00743
- Hystad P., Larkin A., Rangarajan S., AlHabib K.F., Avezum Á., Calik K.B.T., et al. Associations of outdoor fine particulate air pollution and cardiovascular disease in 157 436 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Planet Health. 2020; 4(6): e235–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30103-0
- Lao X.Q., Guo C., Chang L.Y., Bo Y., Zhang Z., Chuang Y.C., et al. Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and incident type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study. Diabetologia. 2019; 62(5): 759–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-019-4825-1
- Gilcrease G.W., Padovan D., Heffler E., Peano C., Massaglia S., Roccatello D., et al. Is air pollution affecting the disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? State of the art and a systematic literature review. Eur. J. Rheumatol. 2020; 7(1): 31–4. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjrheum.2019.19141
- Khalili R., Bartell S.M., Hu X., Liu Y., Chang H.H., Belanoff C., et al. Early-life exposure to PM2.5 and risk of acute asthma clinical encounters among children in Massachusetts: a case-crossover analysis. Environ. Health. 2018; 17(1): 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0361-6
- Keet C.A., Keller J.P., Peng R.D. Long-term coarse particulate matter exposure is associated with asthma among children in Medicaid. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018; 197(6): 737–46. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201706-1267OC
- Thangavel P., Park D., Lee Y.C. Recent insights into particulate matter (PM2.5)-mediated toxicity in humans: an overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19(12): 7511. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127511
- Wang X., Xu Z., Su H., Ho H.C., Song Y., Zheng H., et al. Ambient particulate matter (PM1, PM2.5, PM10) and childhood pneumonia: The smaller particle, the greater short-term impact? Sci. Total. Environ. 2021; 772: 145509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145509
- Wang W., Mao F., Zou B., Guo J., Wu L., Pan Z., et al. Two-stage model for estimating the spatiotemporal distribution of hourly PM1.0 concentrations over central and east China. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019; 675: 658–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.134
- Chen G., Knibbs L.D., Zhang W., Li S., Cao W., Guo J., et al. Estimating spatiotemporal distribution of PM1 concentrations in China with satellite remote sensing, meteorology, and land use information. Environ. Pollut. 2018; 233: 1086–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.011
- Hassanvand M.S., Naddafi K., Faridi S., Nabizadeh R., Sowlat M.H., Momeniha F., et al. Characterization of PAHs and metals in indoor/outdoor PM10/PM2.5/PM1 in a retirement home and a school dormitory. Sci. Total. Environ. 2015; 527-528: 100–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.001
- PM1 particulate matter; 2021. Available at: https://www.iqair.com/us/newsroom/pm1
- Hu Y., Wu M., Li Y., Liu X. Influence of PM1 exposure on total and cause-specific respiratory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022; 29(10): 15117–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16536-0
- Zaitseva N.V., Kiryanov D.A., Kleyn S.V., Tsinker M.Yu., Andrishunas A.M. Distribution of micro-sized range solid particles in the human airways: field experiment. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2023; 102(5): 412–20. https://doi.org/10.47470/0016-9900-2023-102-5-412-420 https://elibrary.ru/imnzus (in Russian)
- Trusov P.V., Zaitseva N.V., Tsinker M.Yu., Nekrasova A.V. Mathematical model of airflow and solid particles transport in the human nasal cavity. Matematicheskaya biologiya i bioinformatika. 2021; 16(2): 349–66. https://doi.org/10.17537/2021.16.349 https://elibrary.ru/yopoon (in Russian)
- Trusov P.V., Zaitseva N.V., Tsinker M.Yu., Kuchukov A.I. Numeric investigation of non-stationary dust-containing airflow and deposition of dust particles in the lower airways. Matematicheskaya biologiya i bioinformatika. 2023; 18(2): 347–66. https://doi.org/10.17537/2023.18.347 (in Russian)
- Ferrari L., Carugno M., Bollati V. Particulate matter exposure shapes DNA methylation through the lifespan. Clin. Epigenetics. 2019; 11(1): 129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-019-0726-x
- Yin P., Guo J., Wang L., Fan W., Lu F., Guo M., et al. Higher risk of cardiovascular disease associated with smaller size-fractioned particulate matter. Env. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020; 7(2): 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00735
- Wu Q.Z., Li S., Yang B.Y., Bloom M., Shi Z., Knibbs L., et al. Ambient airborne particulates of diameter ≤1 μm, a leading contributor to the association between ambient airborne particulates of diameter ≤2.5 μm and children’s blood pressure. Hypertension. 2020; 75(2): 347–55. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.13504
- Chetverkina K.V., Shur P.Z. Scientific substantiation of average annual maximum permissible level of vanadium pentoxide in ambient air as per permissible health risk. Analiz riska zdorov’yu. 2024; (1): 18–25. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2024.1.02 https://elibrary.ru/jrdcmq (in Russian)
- Shur P.Z., Zaitseva N.V., Khasanova A.A., Chetverkina K.V., Ukhabov V.M. Establishing indicators for assessing non-carcinogenic risks under chronic inhalation exposure to benzene and average annual MPC for benzene as per health risk criteria. Health Risk Analysis. 2021; (4): 42–9. https://doi.org/10.21668/health.risk/2021.4.04.eng https://elibrary.ru/prammh
- Zhang Y., Wei J., Shi Y., Quan C., Ho H.C., Song Y., et al. Early-life exposure to submicron particulate air pollution in relation to asthma development in Chinese preschool children. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2021; 148(3): 771–82.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.030
- Wang X., Xu Z., Su H., Ho H.C., Song Y., Zheng H., et al. Ambient particulate matter (PM1, PM2.5, PM10) and childhood pneumonia: The smaller particle, the greater short-term impact? Sci. Total. Environ. 2021; 772: 145509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145509
- Zhang Y., Ding Z., Xiang Q., Wang W., Huang L., Mao F. Short-term effects of ambient PM1 and PM2.5 air pollution on hospital admission for respiratory diseases: Case-crossover evidence from Shenzhen, China. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2020; 224: 113418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.11.001
- Yu H., Guo Y., Zeng X., Gao M., Yang B.Y., Hu L.W., et al. Modification of caesarean section on the associations between air pollution and childhood asthma in seven Chinese cities. Environ. Pollut. 2020; 267: 115443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115443
- Luong L.M., Phung D., Sly P.D., Morawska L., Thai P.K. The association between particulate air pollution and respiratory admissions among young children in Hanoi, Vietnam. Sci. Total. Environ. 2017; 578: 249–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.012
- Michaud J.P., Grove J.S., Krupitsky D. Emergency department visits and “vog”-related air quality in Hilo, Hawai’i. Environ. Res. 2004; 95(1): 11–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-9351(03)00122-1
- WHO. Air Quality Guidelines. World Health Organization; 2021. Available at: https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/WHO-Air-Quality-Guidelines?language=en_US
- EU air quality standards. European Commission; 2010. Available at: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/air/air-quality/eu-air-quality-standards_en
- WHO. Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Summary of risk assessment; 2005. Available at: https://iris.who.int/rest/bitstreams/65728/retrieve
- Chen G., Li S., Zhang Y., Zhang W., Li D., Wei X., et al. Effects of ambient PM1 air pollution on daily emergency hospital visits in China: an epidemiological study. Lancet Planet Health. 2017; 1(6): e221–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30100-6
- Jalava P.I., Wang Q., Kuspalo K., Ruusunen J., Hao L., Fang D., et al. Day and night variation in chemical composition and toxicological responses of size segregated urban air PM samples in a high air pollution situation. Atmos. Environ. 2015; (120): 427–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.089
- Kolpakova A.F. On the relationship of anthropogenic air pollution by particulate matter with cancer risk. Gigiena i Sanitaria (Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal). 2020; 99(3): 298–302. https://doi.org/10.33029/0016-9900-2020-99-3-298-302 https://elibrary.ru/hbbtwu (in Russian)
Supplementary files
