Study of toxicity of detergents and assessment of their safety in “in vitro” studies

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Introduction. The use of gels, powders for washing various textiles ensures cleanliness and prevents the emergence and spread of infections associated with the entry of pathogens into the fabrics. As a rule, the composition of detergents includes: surface-active substances, soaps, enzymes, fragrances, preservatives, softeners, and this mixture of components can cause irritation or allergic contact dermatitis, especially in patients with dry skin and reduced barrier function. Therefore, the problem of toxicity of fabrics after washing with modern detergents becomes relevant.
The goal is to establish the toxicity parameters of modern detergents (washing powders and gels) and fabrics after washing in accordance with the requirements of MR29 FTS/4746 of December 27, 2001 and GOST 32075–2013.
Materials and methods. Toxicity of twenty one detergent (10 washing powders and 11 gels) and toxicity of different kinds of fabrics (cotton and polycotton) after washing were studied. The studies were carried out at the Institute of Disinfectology of the Federal Research Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman on movable cell culture (bovine spermatozoa) on Image Analyzer AT-05.
Results. After a single wash with washing powders and gels 80 % and 4.5 % of textiles were toxic, respectively. Thus, gels are better removed from textiles after a single wash than washing powders. Thirteen of the 21 detergents studied did not meet the requirements of MR29 FTS/4746 of December 27, 2001 the minimal non-toxic dilution (MND) exceeded the maximum allowable dilution of 1:2500. After single washing of powders toxic properties have been established
in 7 of 10 samples of cotton fabric and in 9 of 10 samples of polycotton fabric. In the “Daily washing” mode, it safe indices of fabrics from (70–120) % were determined for all samples of cotton and polycotton fabrics. After washing gels 1 of 11 toxic samples of cotton fabric were revealed.
Limitations. Our study lacks data on the cytotoxic effects of residual fluid after rinsing.
Conclusion. The toxicity of modern detergents and toxicity of textiles after washing in various modes were studied. It was found that of the modern detergents studied, 62 % of the samples did not comply with MR29 FTS/4746, and 38 % of the textile samples after washing did not comply with GOST 32075–2013. Toxicity of the textiles subjected to washing depended on the form of detergent and the washing mode. When washing textiles in the 30 °C mode for 30 minutes, additional two rinses (each for 30 minutes) are required.

About the authors

Margarita V. Matrosenko

Institute of Disinfectology of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: matrosenko.mv@fncg.ru
junior researcher, Division of Toxicology (with laboratory), Institute of Disinfectology of the Federal Research Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Moscow, 117246, Russian Federation

Marina V. Bidevkina

Institute of DisinfectologInstitute of Disinfectology of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erismany of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: bidevkina.mv@fncg.ru
DSc (Medicine), Head of the Division of Toxicology (with laboratory), Institute of Disinfectology of the Federal Research Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Moscow, 117246, Russian Federation

Yulia V. Demina

Institute of Disinfectology of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman

Email: dyemina.yuv@fncg.ru
DSc (Medicine), assistant professor, Director, Institute of Disinfectology of the Federal Scientific Center of Hygiene named after F.F. Erisman, Moscow, 117246, Russian Federation

References

  1. Pal N. Eutrophication – an ecological menace. Biotica Res. Today. 2020; 2(7): 559–61.
  2. Rustemeyer T., van Hoogstraten I.M.W., von Blomberg B.M.E., Scheper R.J. Mechanisms of allergic contact dermatitis. In: Malte John S., Johansen J.D., Rustemeyer T., Elsner P., Maibach H.I., eds. Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. Volume 1. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; 2020: 151–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68617-2_14
  3. Rebello S., Asok A.K., Mundayoor S., Jisha M.S. Surfactants: toxicity, remediation and green surfactants. Environ. Chem. Letters. 2014; 12(2): 275–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-014-0466-2
  4. Wang M., Tan G., Eljaszewicz A., Meng Y., Wawrzyniak P., Acharya S., et al. Laundry detergents and detergent residue after rinsing directly disrupt tight junction barrier integrity in human bronchial epithelial cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019; 143(5): 1892–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.016
  5. Vanneste L., Persson L., Zimerson E., Bruze M., Luyckx R., Goossens A. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by methylisothiazolinone from different sources, including ‘mislabelled’ household wet wipes. Contact Dermatitis. 2013; 69(5): 311–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12143
  6. Kiriyama T., Sugiura H., Uehara M. Residual washing detergent in cotton clothes: a factor of winter deterioration of dry skin in atopic dermatitis. J. Dermatol. 2003; 30(10): 708–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1346-8138.2003.tb00463.x
  7. Abeliotis K., Candan C., Amberg C., Ferri A., Osset M., Owens J., et al. Impact of water hardness on consumers’ perception of laundry washing result in five European countries. Int. J. Consumer Stud. 2015; 39(1): 60–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12149
  8. Goel G., Kaur S. A study on chemical contamination of water due to household laundry detergents. J. Hum. Ecol. 2012; 38(1): 65–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2012.11906475
  9. Буканова Е.Ф., Лапшин А.А., Чупарин И.И. Адсорбция солей твердости и поверхностно-активных веществ на хлопчатобумажной ткани. Тонкие химические технологии. 2015; 10(2): 47–52. https://elibrary.ru/uinvrf
  10. Филиппенков В.М. Сравнительная оценка механизмов удаления загрязнений с хлопчатобумажных тканей моющими средствами в воде различной жёсткости. Прикладная аналитическая химия. 2013; 4(1): 40–7. https://elibrary.ru/qjehjj
  11. Antrim R.L., Buchert J., Burrows H., Herbots I., Kottwitz B., Lenting H.B.M. Industrial enzymes: enzymes in nonfood applications. In: Aehle W., ed. Enzymes in Industry: Production and Applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2004: 155–244. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527602135.ch5b
  12. Tanzer J., Meng D., Ohsaki A., Caldwell J.M., Mingler M.K., Rothenberg M.E., et al. Laundry detergent promotes allergic skin inflammation and esophageal eosinophilia in mice. PLoS One. 2022; 17(6): e0268651. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268651
  13. Goodman N., Nematollahi N., Steinemann A. Fragranced laundry products and emissions from dryer vents: implications for air quality and health. Air Qual. Atmos. Health. 2021; 14(2): 245–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00929-0
  14. Periyasamy A.P., Tehrani-Bagha A. A review on microplastic emission from textile materials and its reduction techniques. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2022; 199: 109901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.109901

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2025


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.