Study of Sensitivity Distribution Along the Contour of a Fiber-Optic Sensor Based on a Sagnac Interferometer

T. V. Gritsenko; Гриценко Т. В.; N. V. Dyakova; Дьякова Н. В.; A. A. Zhirnov; Жирнов А. А.; K. V. Stepanov; Степанов К. В.; R. I. Khan; Хан Р. И.; K. I. Koshelev; Кошелев К. И.; A. B. Pnev; Пнев А. Б.; V. E. Karasik; Карасик В. Е.

doi:10.31857/S0032816223050105

Study of Sensitivity Distribution Along the Contour of a Fiber-Optic Sensor Based on a Sagnac Interferometer

Authors: Gritsenko T.V.¹, Dyakova N.V.¹, Zhirnov A.A.¹, Stepanov K.V.¹, Khan R.I.¹, Koshelev K.I.¹, Pnev A.B.¹, Karasik V.E.¹
Affiliations:
1. Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Issue: No 5 (2023)
Pages: 84-91
Section: ОБЩАЯ ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНАЯ ТЕХНИКА
URL: https://ruspoj.com/0032-8162/article/view/670417
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032816223050105
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZJPJJP
ID: 670417

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The sensitivity of the Sagnac interferometer for various acoustic influence coordinates was studied. The principles of the formation of a dead zone in an acoustic distributed fiber-optic sensor based on the Sagnac interferometer have been obtained and experimentally confirmed. The response of the interferometer was studied for different types of acoustic impact on the circuit: in the form of a rectangular pulse, sinusoidal, and in the form of a periodic triangular function. The nature of the change in the phase difference at the output of the Sagnac interferometer for each of them was studied. With the found value of the typical frequency ft,hit=10.8 kHz and a loop length of 20 km, numerical simulation and experimental study of the amplitude of the phase difference under acoustic impact through each 1 km of the loop in the range from 0 to 10 km were carried out. A dead zone elimination method is proposed for integrating the Sagnac interferometer into a complex monitoring system using a phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometer.

References

Gorshkov B.G., Yüksel K., Fotiadi A.A., Wuilpart M., Korobko D.A., Zhirnov A.A., Stepanov K.V., Turov A.T., Konstantinov Y.A., Lobach I.A. // Sensors. 2022. V. 22 (3). P. 1033. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031033
Zhirnov A.A., Stepanov K.V., Sazonkin S.G., Choban T.V., Koshelev K.I., Chernutsky A.O., Pnev A.B., Novikov A.O., Yagodnikov D.A. // Sensors. 2021. V. 21 (23). P. 7836. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21237836
Choban T.V., Zhirnov A.A., Chernutsky A.O., Stepanov K.V., Pniov A.B., Galzerano G., Karasik V.E., Svelto C.J. // Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019. V. 1410 (1). P. 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1410/1/012108
Peng F., Wu H., Jia X.-H., Rao Y.-J., Wang Z.-N., Peng Z.-P. // Opt. Express, 2014. V. 22 (11). P. 13804. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.013804
Stepanov K.V., Zhirnov A.A., Chernutsky A.O., Koshel-ev K.I., Pnev A.B., Lopunov A.I., Butov O.V. // Sensors, 2020. V. 20. P. 6431. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226431
Stepanov K.V., Zhirnov A.A., Chernutsky A.O., Choban T.V., Pnev A.B., Lopunov A.I., Butov O.V. // IEEE Proc. of International Conference Laser Optics 2020. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLO48556.2020.9285505
Pi S., Wang B., Zhao J., Hong G., Zhao D., Jia B. // Proc. of Interferometry XVII: Techniques and Analysis. 2014. V. 9203. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2059925
Liu K., Jin X., Jiang J., Xu T., Ding Z., Huang Y., Sun Z., Xue K., Li S., Liu T. // IEEE Sens. J. 2022. V. 22. P. 21428. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3213036
Zhirnov A.A., Choban T.V., StePanov K.V., Koshelev K.I., Chernutsky A.O., Pnev A.B., Karasik V.E. // Sensors. 2022. V. 22(7). P. 2772. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072772
Spammer J., Swart L., Chtcherbakov A., Lightwave J. // Technol, 1997. V. 15 (6). P. 972. https://doi.org/10.1109/50.588669
Choban T.V., Zhirnov A.A., Tolstoguzov V.L., Tikhomir-ov S.V., Pnev A.B., Karasik V.E., Svelto C. // IEEE Proc. of International Conference Laser Optics 2020. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLO48556.2020.9285542.
Huang J., Chen Y., Peng H., Zhou P., Song Q., Huang P., Xiao Q., Jia B. // Opt. Commun. 2021. V. 57 (2). P. 027104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2020.126420
Choban T.V., Zhirnov A.A., Stepanov K.V., Khan R.I., Pniov A.B., Svelto C., Lopunov A.I., Butov O.V. // IEEE Proc. of International Conference Laser Optics. 2022. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLO54117.2022.9839786
Shimizu T., Nakajima K., Shiraki K., Ieda K., Sankawa I. // Opt. Fiber Technol. 2008. V. 14. P. 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yofte.2007.04.004
Krakenes K., Blotekjaer K. // Opt. Lett. 1989. V. 14 (20). P. 1152. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.14.001152
Zhang G., Xi C., Liang Y., Zuo H. // IEEE Xplore Proc. of Cross Strait Quad-Regional Radio Science and Wireless Technology Conf. 2011. V. 2. P. 1598. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSQRWC.2011.6037279
Teng F., Yi D., Hong X., Li X. // Opt. Express. 2021. V. 29 (9). P. 13696. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.421569
Ma P., Liu K., Sun Z., Jiang J., Wang S., Xu T., Xu Z., Liu T. // Opt. Lasers Eng. 2020. V. 129. P. 106060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106060
Kondrat M., Szustakowski M., Patka N., Ciurapinski W., Zyczkowski M. // Opto-Electron. Rev. 2007. V. 15 (3). P. 127. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11772-007-0012-x
Mangmeng C., Ali M., Gilberto B. // Opt. Express. 2019. V. 27 (7). P. 9684. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.009684
Wang B., Yu X., Wu H., Zhang J., Meng X. // Opt. Commun. 2017. V. 382. P. 272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.07.022
McAulay A., Wang J. // Proc. of Enabling Photonic Technologies for Aerospace Applications VI. 2004. V. 5435. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.542834