Magnetocaloric Effect in the Laves Phase of GdNi2 in Strong Magnetic Fields

A. P. Kamantsev; Каманцев А. П.; V. V. Koledov; Коледов В. В.; V. G. Shavrov; Шавров В. Г.; D. V. Plakhotskiy; Плахотский Д. В.; M. Yu. Bogush; Богуш М. Ю.; M. V. Utarbekova; Утарбекова М. В.; M. A. Orshulevich; Оршулевич М. А.

doi:10.31857/S0033849423040137

Magnetocaloric Effect in the Laves Phase of GdNi2 in Strong Magnetic Fields

Authors: Kamantsev A.P.¹, Koledov V.V.¹, Shavrov V.G.¹, Plakhotskiy D.V.², Bogush M.Y.², Utarbekova M.V.², Orshulevich M.A.²
Affiliations:
1. Kotelnikov Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Chelyabinsk State University
Issue: Vol 68, No 4 (2023)
Pages: 384-390
Section: К 90-ЛЕТИЮ ВЛАДИМИРА ГРИГОРЬЕВИЧА ШАВРОВА
URL: https://ruspoj.com/0033-8494/article/view/650555
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0033849423040137
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PFZESS
ID: 650555

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Experimental studies of the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the Laves phase of GdNi2 have been carried out in external static up to 3 T and pulsed up to 50 T magnetic fields. It has been found that in a magnetic field of 3 T the change in the magnetic entropy of the alloy reaches its maximum value ΔSm = −8 J/(kg K) in the vicinity of the Curie temperature TC = 73.6 K. The corresponding adiabatic temperature change in this case, calculated by an indirect method, is ΔTad ≈ 3 K. The maximum value of the adiabatic temperature change measured by the direct method in a pulsed magnetic field of 50 T at T0 = 77 K, was equal to ΔTad = 15 K, which agrees well with theoretical predictions.

Keywords

magnetic and magnetocaloric properties, Laves phase, Curie temperature

References

Суслов Д.А., Шавров В.Г., Коледов В.В. и др. // Челябинский физико-математический журн. 2020. Т. 5. № 4. С. 612. https://doi.org/10.47475/2500-0101-2020-15420
Stein F., Leineweber A. // J. Mater. Sci. 2021. V. 56. № 9. P. 5321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05509-2
Chu F., Chen Z.W., Fuller C.J. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 1996. V. 79. № 8. P. 6405. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.362013
Young K-H., Chang S., Lin X. // Batteries. 2017. V. 3. № 3. P. 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries3030027
Goremychkin A., Natkaniec I., Mühle E., Chistyakov O.D. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1989. V. 81. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(89)90229-1
Plaza J.R., de Sousa V.S.R., von Ranke P.J. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2009. V. 105. № 1. P. 013903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3054178
von Ranke P.J., Nobrega E.P., de Oliveira I.G. et al. // J. Alloys Compound. 2002. V. 344. № 1-2. P.145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(02)00354-7
Gomes M., Oliveira I.S., Guimarães A.P., et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2003. V. 93. № 10. P. 6939. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1558251
Nouri K., Saidi M., Walha S. et al. // Chemistry Africa. 2020. V. 3. № 1. P. 111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42250-019-00095-6
Sánchez Llamazares J.L., Sánchez-Valdes C.F., Ibarra-Gaytan P.J. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2013. V. 113. № 17. P. 17A912. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4794988
Ibarra-Gaytán P.J., Sánchez Llamazares J.L., Álvarez-Alonso P. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2015. V. 117. № 17. P. 17C116. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915480
Taskaev S.V., Buchelnikov V.D., Pellenen A.P. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2013. V. 113. № 13. P. 17A933. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4799256
Taskaev S., Skokov K., Khovaylo, V. et al. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2018. V. 459. P. 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.12.052
Matsumoto K., Asamato K., Nishimura Y. et al. // J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2012. V. 400. № 5. Article No. 052020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/400/5/052020
Baranov N.V., Proshkin A.V., Gerasimov E.G. et al. // Phys. Rev. B 2007. V. 75. № 9. P. 092402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.092402
Jiang C. // Acta Mater. 2007. V. 55. P. 1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.020
Skrabeck E.A., Wallace W.E. // J. Appl. Phys. 1963. V. 34. № 4. P. 1356. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1729507
Coey J.M.D. Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Cambridge University. N.Y.: Press, 2009.
Gottschall T., Kuz’min M.D., Skokov K.P. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 2019. V. 99. № 13. P. 134429. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.134429
Каманцев А.П., Амиров А.А., Кошкидько Ю.С. и др. // ФТТ. 2020. Т. 62. № 1. С. 117.
Pan Y.Y., Nash P. // Phase Diagrams of Binary Nickel Alloys / Ed. by P. Nash. Materials Park: ASM International, 1991. P. 382.
Fiorillo F. Characterization and Measurement of Magnetic Materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2004. P. 554.
Paudyal D., Mudryk Y., Lee Y.B. et al. // Phys. Rev. B 2008. V. 78. № 18. P. 184436. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.184436
Taskaev S., Khovaylo V., Skokov K. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2020. V. 127. № 22. P. 233906. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006281
Oesterreicher H., Parker T.F. // J. Appl. Phys. 1984. V. 55. № 12. P. 4334. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.333046
Khovaylo V.V., Taskaev S.V. // Encyclopedia of Smart Materials. 2022. V. 5. P. 407. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815732-9.00132-7