The Deformation Criterion in Joint Calculations of Stone Structures and Foundations

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The article describes the identification of the most adequate deformation criterion when calculating a building and a foundation interaction. A historical excursus demonstrates how the criterion for calculating the buildings foundations for the second group of limiting conditions was adopted. It made it possible to limit the development of the buildings masonry dangerous deformations in interaction with the base to the limiting values of absolute draught and draught relative unevenness. It is shown that the limiting values of the base and the structure joint deformation in modern domestic and European standards for masonry buildings without reinforcement are based on field observations made in the middle of the last century, as well as on theoretical examination and laboratory tests of the brick beam work for bending on a pliable base. The maximum draught values and their relative unevenness correspond to the beginning of the cracks formation in the walls brickwork. At the current computer technology level, when joint calculations of the building and the foundation became possible, it is expediently to return to the initial deformation criterion, namely, the critical tensile strain, which characterizes the brickwork elastic limit before cracking. When considering the building and the foundation in a single calculation scheme, the draught limits and their unevenness turn out to be secondary to the immediate criterion determining the cracking onset. A practical example shows how the proposed criterion can be used to assess the impact on an architectural monument of modern man-made impacts associated with the underground structures construction in courtyards when adapting a cultural heritage object for modern use.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

V. Shashkin

Institute “Georeconstruction”; Saint-Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: vashashkin@pi-georeconstruction.ru

Candidate of Sciences (Engineering)

Rússia, 4, Izmaylovskiy proezd, St. Petersburg, 190005; 4, 2nd Krasnoarmeyskaya Street, Saint Petersburg 190005

Bibliografia

  1. Burland J.D., Wroth C.P. Settlement of buildings and associated damage. State-of-the-Art Review. Proc. Conf. Settlement of Structures. Cambridge: Pentech Press. London. 1974, pp. 611–654.
  2. Ulitsky V.M., Shashkin A.G., Shashkin K.G. Joint calculations of the «foundation – building» system. Proceedings of the conf. ROMGGiF. Moscow. 2007. Vol. 2, pp. 307–312.
  3. Ulitsky V.M., Shashkin A.G., Shashkin K.G. Interaction of buildings and foundations. Geotechnica. 2009. No. 1, pp. 6–19. (In Russian).
  4. Ulitsky V.M., Shashkin A.G., Shashkin K.G., Shashkin V.A. Osnovy sovmestnykh raschetov zdanii i osnovanii [Fundamentals of joint calculations of buildings and foundations]. Saint Petersburg: Georeconstructiya. 2014. 328 p. EDN: MXTDLR
  5. Polshin D.E. and Tokar R.A. Maximum allowable non-uniform settlement of structures. Proceedings 4th Int. Conference On Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Butterworth’s scientific: London, UK. 1957. Vol. 1, pp. 402–404.
  6. Vasenin V.A., Shashkin A.G. Vekovye osadki zdanii Sankt-Peterburga [Century-old precipitation of buildings in Saint Petersburg]. Saint Petersburg: Georeconstruction. 2022. 440 p. EDN: JYCRQJ
  7. Abelev Yu.M., Abelev M.Y. Osnovy proektirovaniya i stroitel’stva na prosadochnykh makroporistykh gruntakh [Fundamentals of design and construction on subsident macroporous soils]. Moscow: Stroyizdat. 1979. 271 p.
  8. Egorov K.E. Osadki fundamentov vysotnykh zdanii. V sb. statei «K raschetu deformatsii osnovanii» [Precipitation of foundations of high-rise buildings. In the collection of articles “On the calculation of base deformations”]. Moscow: NIIOSP. 2002, pp. 125–143.
  9. Burland J.B., Broms B.B., De Mello,V.F.B. Behaviour of Foundations and Structures. Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Tokyo. Japan. 1977, pp. 495–546.
  10. Skempton A.W. and McDonald D.H. The allowable settlements of buildings. Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers part III. 1956. Vol. 5 (No. 50), pp. 727–768. https://doi.org/10.1680/ipeds.1956.12202
  11. Bjerrum L. Allowable settlement of structures. Proceedings European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Wiesbaden. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erd-und Grundbau e.V., 1963, 15–18 October. Vol. 3, pp. 135–137.
  12. Shashkin V.A. Accumulated deformations of the historical development of St. Petersburg. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2023. No. 12, pp. 32–45. (In Russian). EDN: CITCIO. https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2023-12-32-45
  13. Bourguignoli A., Yamiolkovsky M., Vigiani K. Application of geotechnics as a component of an interdisciplinary approach for the preservation of historical cities and monuments. Razvitie Gorodov i Geotekhnicheskoe Stroitel’stvo. 2010. No. 1, pp. 1–45. (In Russian).
  14. Shashkin A.G., Bogov S.G. The use of jet grouting technology in the construction of an underground volume in conditions of weak clay soils. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2014. No. 9, pp. 27–33. (In Russian). EDN: SMVCNX
  15. Shashkin A.G. Consideration of deformations of shape change in the calculation of foundations of buildings and underground structures. Zhilishchnoe Stroitel’stvo [Housing Construction]. 2011. No. 7, pp. 17–21. (In Russian). EDN: OITIQJ

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The results of the foundation draught relative unevenness measurements for ten brick buildings with foundation on a natural base (dots indicate cases when the walls did not have cracks; crosses indicate cases of cracks in the walls) according to D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar [5]Fig. 1. The results of the foundation draught relative unevenness measurements for ten brick buildings with foundation on a natural base (dots indicate cases when the walls did not have cracks; crosses indicate cases of cracks in the walls) according to D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar [5]Fig. 1. The results of the foundation draught relative unevenness measurements for ten brick buildings with foundation on a natural base (dots indicate cases when the walls did not have cracks; crosses indicate cases of cracks in the walls) according to D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar [5]Fig. 1. The results of the foundation draught relative unevenness measurements for ten brick buildings with foundation on a natural base (dots indicate cases when the walls did not have cracks; crosses indicate cases of cracks in the walls) according to D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar [5]Fig. 1. The results of the foundation draught relative unevenness measurements for ten brick buildings with foundation on a natural base (dots indicate cases when the walls did not have cracks; crosses indicate cases of cracks in the walls) according to D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar [5]Fig. 1. The results of the foundation draught relative unevenness measurements for ten brick buildings with foundation on a natural base (dots indicate cases when the walls did not have cracks; crosses indicate cases of cracks in the walls) according to D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar [5]Fig. 1. The results of the foundation draught relative unevenness measurements for ten brick buildings with foundation on a natural base (dots indicate cases when the walls did not have cracks; crosses indicate cases of cracks in the walls) according to D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar [5]

Baixar (53KB)
3. Fig. 2. Test of a brick fragment demonstrating crack formation due to flexural deformations: at the onset of visible crack formation, the tensile strain values ​​varied from 0.038% to approximately 0.06% [1]

Baixar (289KB)
4. Fig. 3. Comparison between the criteria for the visible cracking onset in rectangular beams and other damage criteria at εcrit=0.075% (according to J. Berland [1]): 1 – diagonal marginal tension strain; 2 – deflection – neutral axis in the middle, bending marginal tension strain, 3 – bending – neutral axis at the lower end, bending marginal strain of tension

Baixar (86KB)
5. Fig. 4. Determining of inclination ω and relative rotation (angular deviation) β (according to J. Berland [1])

Baixar (54KB)
6. Fig. 5. The relations between Δ/L and L/H for buildings with load–bearing walls showing different damage degrees (according to J. Berland [1]): a – deflection deformation, b – deflection deformation (the numbered curves refer to the theoretical criteria shown in fig. 3; dots numbered 4–14 are practical examples of the cracks development in buildings according to various researchers – circles indicate cases of no damage, dots indicate minor damage, crosses indicate significant damage)

Baixar (139KB)
7. Fig. 6. Dependence of the relative draught difference ΔS/L on the ratio of the structure length to its height L/H for historical buildings in the center of St.-Petersburg

Baixar (152KB)
8. Fig. 7. View of the former Pavlovsky regiment Life Guards barracks on the Field of Mars building: a – modern photography; b – the building finite element scheme in the FEM-models program

Baixar (526KB)
9. Fig. 8. Engineering and geological conditions of the territory combined with the excavation project in the architectural monument courtyard

Baixar (228KB)
10. Fig. 9. The building longitudinal section

Baixar (98KB)
11. Fig. 10. The soil-cement massif shape arranged at o13–14.5 m depths

Baixar (259KB)
12. Fig. 11. «Verification» calculation of the excavation consequences for the cultural heritage site (a fragment of a flat calculation scheme is shown)

Baixar (136KB)
13. Fig. 12. Isolines of the soil base additional draught from the underground volumes arrangement in courtyards (taking into account technological draught), m

Baixar (103KB)
14. Fig. 13. The results of the additional deformations ε₁ in the direction of the main stresses action σ₁ calculation indicating the numbers of the calculation scheme fragments

Baixar (206KB)
15. Fig. 14. Additional deformations ε₁ in the main stresses direction σ₁: a – section 1; b – section 2; c – section 3; d – section 4 (the numbers of the calculation scheme fragments are shown in fig. 13)

Baixar (796KB)

Declaração de direitos autorais © Advertising publishing company "STROYMATERIALY", 2025