From Hydrophylicity to Surface Hydrophobicity: Variation of the Wettability of a Material on a Substrate Due to Local Vibrational Effects during Its Interface Synthesis
- Authors: Golubina E.N.1, Kizim N.F.1
- 
							Affiliations: 
							- Novomoskovsk Institute, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology
 
- Issue: Vol 97, No 1 (2023)
- Pages: 75-80
- Section: PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY OF SOLUTIONS
- Submitted: 27.02.2025
- Published: 01.01.2023
- URL: https://ruspoj.com/0044-4537/article/view/668874
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453723010107
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BBQKBM
- ID: 668874
Cite item
Abstract
A system of an aqueous solution of a lanthanide salt di-(2-ethylhexyl)phosphoric acid in a diluent (heptane, toluene, carbon tetrachloride) is used to show that the local vibration on the interfacial layer in a system of two immiscible liquids during interfacial synthesis can produce a qualitative change in the wettability of the substrate onto which the material of interfacial formations is transferred. This makes the surface hydrophobic or hydrophilic due to different structuring, as in the lotus leaf effect. By varying the composition of the system, the conditions of the process, and the parameters of the external force field, a material with a given angle of contact (30° to 163°) can be obtained, improving the consumer qualities of its carrier.
About the authors
E. N. Golubina
Novomoskovsk Institute, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology
														Email: Elena-Golubina@mail.ru
				                					                																			                												                								301650, Novomoskovsk, Russia						
N. F. Kizim
Novomoskovsk Institute, Mendeleev University of Chemical Technology
							Author for correspondence.
							Email: Elena-Golubina@mail.ru
				                					                																			                												                								301650, Novomoskovsk, Russia						
References
- Lyubimov D.V., Lyubimova T.P., Tcherepanov A.A. et al. // Microgravity Science and Technology. 2005. V. 16. № 1. P. 290. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF029459932005
- Ouriev B. // Rheologica Acta. 2007. V. 46. № 6. P. 785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-006-0152-9
- Ubbenjans B., Frank-Rotsch Ch., Virbulis J. et al. // Crystal Research and Technology. 2012. V. 47. № 3. P. 279. https://doi.org/10.1002_crat.201100413
- Chirita G., Stefanescu I., Soares D., Silva F.S. // Materials & Design. 2009. V. 30. № 5. P. 1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.045
- Premvrat Kumar, Sandeep Katiyar // Intern. J. of Engineering Research and Technology. 2018. V. 7. № 6. P. 370.
- Patel V.P., Patel J.V., Patel A.V., Bhuva B.V. // Intern. Research J. of Engineering and Technology. 2019. V. 6. № 12. P. 1047.
- Wen Lai Huang, Kai Ming Liang, Shi Hua Cui, Shou Ren Gu // Materials Research Bulletin. 2001. V. 36. № 3–4. P. 461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5408(01)00524-4
- Alvarez A., Friend J., Yeo L.Y. // Langmuir. 2008. V. 24. P. 10629. https://doi.org/10.1021/la802255b
- Руденко О.В., Коробов А.И., Коршак Б.А. и др.// Российские нанотехнологии. 2010. Т. 5. № 7–8. С. 63. Rudenko O.V., Korobov A.I., Korshak B.A. et al. // Nanotechnologies in Russia. 2010. V. 5. № 7–8. P. 469. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078010070062
- Голубина Е.Н., Кизим Н.Ф. // Журн. физ. химии. 2021. Т. 95. № 4. С. 508. Golubina E.N., Kizim N.F. // Rus. J. of Phys. Chem. A. 2021. V. 95. № 4. Р. 659. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602442104007510.1134/S0036024421040075.https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044453721040075
- Duan H., Wang D., Kurth D.G., Mohwald H. // Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2004. V. 43. P. 5639. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460920
- Mao Z., Guo J., Bai S. et al. // Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2009. V. 48. № 27. P. 4953. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200901486
- Lin Y., Skaff H., Emrick T. et al. // Science. 2003. V. 299. P. 226. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1078616
- McDowell W.J., Perdue P.T., Case G.N. // J. Inorg. and Nucl. Chem. 1976. V. 38. P. 2127.
- Кизим Н.Ф., Голубина Е.Н. // Журн. физ. химии. 2018. Т. 92. № 3. С. 457. Kizim N.F., Golubina E.N. // Rus. J. of Phys. Chem. A. 2018. V. 92. № 3. Р. 565. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602441803010X
- Голубина Е.Н., Кизим Н.Ф., Чекмарев А.М. // Докл. АН. 2015. Т. 465. № 3. С. 320. Golubina E.N., Kizim N.F., Chekmarev A.M. // Doklady Physical Chemistry. 2015. V. 465. Part 1. Р. 283. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001250161511007X
- Голубина Е.Н., Кизим Н.Ф., Чекмарев А.М. // Журн. физ. химии. 2014. Т. 88. № 9. С. 1429. Kizim N.F., Golubina E.N., Chekmarev A.M. // Rus. J. of Phys. Chem. A. 2014. V. 88. № 9. Р. 1594. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024414090155
- Кизим Н.Ф., Голубина Е.Н. // Хим. технология. 2009. Т. 10. № 5. С. 296.
- Kizim N.F., Golubina E.N., Tarasov V.V. // Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering. 2016. V. 50. № 4. P. 632. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040579516040126
- Golubina E.N., Kizim N.F., Sinyugina E.V., Chernyshev I.N. // Mendeleev Commun. 2018. V. 28. № 1. P. 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2018.01.038
- Чернышев И.Н., Сафронова Е.В., Голубина Е.Н., Кизим Н.Ф. // Успехи в химии и хим. технологии. 2017. Т. 31. № 13. С. 11.
- Голубина Е.Н., Кизим Н.Ф., Чекмарев А.М. // Докл. АН. 2019. Т. 488. № 3. Р. 738. Golubina E.N., Kizim N.F., Chekmarev A.M. // Doklady Physical Chemistry. 2019. V. 488. Part 1. Р. 134. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012501619090069
- Голубина Е.Н., Кизим Н.Ф. // Хим. технология. 2010. Т. 11. № 7. С. 424.
- Cassie A.B.D., Baxter S. // Trans. Faraday Soc. 1944. V. 40. P. 546.
Supplementary files
 
				
			 
					 
						 
						 
						 
						 
									

 
  
  
  Email this article
			Email this article 
 Open Access
		                                Open Access Access granted
						Access granted Subscription or Fee Access
		                                							Subscription or Fee Access
		                                					




