Temperature Dependence of Direct Current Conductivity in TiO2/Epoxy Polymer Dielectric Nanocomposites

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

A study is performed of the effect TiO2 nanoparticles have on the temperature dependence of the direct current conductivity of epoxy polymers. The value of direct current conductivity is determined by analyzing the frequency dependence of the complex permittivity in the 102–105 Hz range of frequencies. Two characteristic regions are found on the temperature dependence of direct current conductivity: the Vogel–Fulcher–Tammann dependence above the glass transition temperature (Tg), and the Arrhenius dependence below Tg, due apparently to a change in the mechanism of conduction after the freezing of ionic mobility at temperatures

Sobre autores

E. Rabenok

Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: jane.rabenok@gmail.com
Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, Russia

G. Novikov

Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: jane.rabenok@gmail.com
Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, Russia

L. Bogdanova

Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: jane.rabenok@gmail.com
Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, Russia

Yu. Bukichev

Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)

Email: jane.rabenok@gmail.com
Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, Russia; 125993, Moscow, Russia

G. Dzhardimalieva

Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University)

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: jane.rabenok@gmail.com
Chernogolovka, Moscow oblast, Russia; 125993, Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Chu B., Zhou X., Ren K. et al. // Sci. 2006. V. 313. P. 334. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127798
  2. Prateek, Thakur V.K., Gupta R.K. // Chem. Rev. 2016. V. 116. P. 4260. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00495
  3. Huang X., Jiang P., Xie L. // Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009. V. 95. P. 242901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3273368
  4. Xie L.Y., Huang X.Y., Wu C. et al. // Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011. V. 21. № 16. P. 5897. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm04574h
  5. Luo H., Chen C., Zhou K. et al. // RSC Advances. 2015. V. 5. № 84. P. 68515. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra11753d
  6. ahimabady M., Mirshekarloo M.S., Yao K. et al. // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2013. V. 15. № 38. P. 16242. 10.1039/c3cp52267
  7. Ioannou G., Patsidis A., Psarras G.C. // Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2011. V. 42. № 1. P. 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.10.010
  8. Patsidis A., Psarras G.C. // ExP. Polym. Lett. 2008. V. 2. № 10. P. 718. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.85
  9. Wang J., Liu S., Wang J. et al. // Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2017. V. 726. P. 587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.341
  10. Hu P., Wang J., Shen Y. et al. // Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2013. V. 1. № 39. P. 12321. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta11886j
  11. Kim J.Y., Jung H.S., No J.H. et al. // Journal of Electroceramics. 2006. V. 16. № 4. P. 447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-006-9895-z
  12. Homes C.C., Vogt T. // Nature Materials. 2013. V. 12. № 9. P. 782. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3744
  13. Noman M.T., Ashraf M.A., Ali A. // Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019. V. 26. P. 3262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3884-z
  14. Kontos G.A., Soulintzis A.L., Karahaliou P.K. et al. // ExP.Polym. Lett. 2007. V. 1. № 12. P. 781. https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.108
  15. Tomara G.N., Kerasidou A.P., Patsidis A.C. et al. // Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2015. V. 71. P. 204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.017
  16. Parker R.A. // Phys. Rev. 1961. V. 124. № 6. P. 1719. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.124.1719
  17. Yu E., Zhang Q., Xu N. et al. // RSC Advances. 2017. V. 7. № 7. P. 3949. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra26772f
  18. Guo R., Luo H., Liu W. et al. // Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2018. V. 20. № 26. P. 18031. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp02958j
  19. Basu R., Iannacchione G.S. // Journal of Applied Physics. 2008. V. 104. № 11. P. 114107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3035963
  20. Dang Z., Shen Y., Fan L. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2003. V. 93. № 9. P. 5543. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1562740
  21. Su R., Luo Z., Zhang D. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016. V. 120. № 22. P. 11769. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01853
  22. Dang Z.M., Yuan J.K., Zha J.W. et al. // Progress in Materials Science. 2013. V. 57. № 4. P. 660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.08.001
  23. Xu N., Hu L., Zhang Q. et al. // ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015. V. 7. № 49. P. 27373. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b08987
  24. Guo N., DiBenedetto S.A., Tewari P. et al. // Chemistry of Materials. 2010. V. 22. № 4. P. 1567. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm902852h
  25. Khan M., Khurram A.A., Li T. et al. // Journal of Materials Science & Technology. 2018. V. 34. № 12. P. 2424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.06.014
  26. Zha J.W., Song H.T., Dang Z.M. et al. // Applied Physics Letters. 2008. V. 93. № 19. P. 192911. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3025408
  27. Zhang Y.H., Dang Z.M., Xin J.H. et al. // Macromolecular Rapid Comm. 2005. V. 26. № 18. P. 1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200500310
  28. Zha J.W., Dang Z.M., Zhou T. et al. // Synthetic Metals. 2010. V. 160. № 23. P. 2670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.10.024
  29. Берестенко В.И., Торбов В.И., Чукалин В.И. и др. // Химия высоких энергий. 2011. Т. 45. № 5. С. 468. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16766121
  30. Букичев Ю.С., Богданова Л.М., Спирин М.Г. и др. // Вестн. Московского авиационного института. 2021. Т. 28. № 2. С. 224. https://doi.org/10.34759/vst-2021-2-224-237
  31. Новиков Г.Ф., Рабенок Е.В., Эстрин Я.И. и др. // Журн. физ. химии. 2014. Т. 88. № 10. С. 1605. https://doi.org/10.7868/S004445371410029X
  32. Novocontrol GmbH // WinFit 2.9 Owner’s Manual. 2000. № 12. P. 137.
  33. Monai M., Montini T., Fornasiero P. // Catalysts. 2017. V. 7. № 10. P. 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7100304
  34. Nikonorova N.A., Barmatov E.B., Pebalk D.A. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2007. V. 111. № 24. P. 8451. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp068688a
  35. Новиков Г.Ф., Рабенок Е.В., Богданова Л.М., Иржак В.И. // Журн. физ. химии. 2017. Т. 91. № 10. С. 1760. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044453717100302
  36. Новиков Г.Ф., Рабенок Е.В., Богданова Л.М. // Сборник трудов XVIII Международной конференции по химии и физикохимии олигомеров. Нижний Новгород, 2019. Т. 2. С. 74.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2.

Baixar (22KB)
Metadados
3.

Baixar (107KB)
Metadados
4.

Baixar (1MB)
Metadados
5.

Baixar (669KB)
Metadados
6.

Baixar (84KB)
Metadados
7.

Baixar (57KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Е.В. Рабенок, Г.Ф. Новиков, Л.М. Богданова, Ю.С. Букичев, Г.И. Джардималиева, 2023