On phosphine-containing gold(I) complexes in solutions in connection with their biological applications

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Some transformations involving AuCl(PPh3) in CH3CN/H2O solution are considered and a comparison is made with known data for auranofin. Interaction with GSH leads to the formation of a binuclear (GSH)[Au(PPh3)]2 (at CGSH/CAu < 0.5) or mononuclear Au(GSH)(PPh3) (CGSH/CAu > 0.5) complex; PPh3 substitution is not observed. Interaction with BSA leads to Cl– substitution. A cyclic voltammetry study showed the presence of several peaks of irreversible oxidation of AuCl(PPh3) and complexes with GSH.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. V. Mironov

Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: imir@niic.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090

V. Y. Kharlamova

Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: imir@niic.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090

D. B. Kal’nyi

Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: imir@niic.nsc.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090

References

  1. Dey D., Al-Hunaiti A., Gopal V. et al. // J. Mol. Struct. 2020. V. 1222. P. 128919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128919
  2. Корман Д.Б., Островская Л.А., Кузьмин В.А. // Вопросы онкологии. 2018. Т. 64. № 6. С. 697. https://doi.org/10.37469/0507-3758-2018-64-6-697-707
  3. Yeo C.I., Ooi K.K., Tiekink E.R.T. // Molecules. 2018. V. 23. P. 1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23061410
  4. Van der Westhuizen D., Bezuidenhout D.I., Munro O.Q. // Dalton Trans. 2021. V. 50. P. 17413. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1dt02783b
  5. Radisavljević S., Petrović B. // Front. Chem. 2020. V. 8. P. 379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00379
  6. Yang Z., Jiang G., Xu Z. et al. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020. V. 423. P. 213492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213492
  7. Lu Y., Ma X., Chang X. et al. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022. V. 51. P. 5518. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00933h
  8. Zhang J., Li Y., Fang R. et al. // Front. Pharmacol. 2022. V. 13. P. 979951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.979951
  9. Shaw III C.F. // Chem. Rev. 1999. V. 99. P. 2589. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr980431o
  10. Bryan D.L.B., Mikuriya Y., Hempel J.C. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 1987. V. 26. P. 4180. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00272a009
  11. Roberts J.R., Xiao J., Schliesman B. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 1996. V. 35. P. 424. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic9414280
  12. Keter F.K., Guzei I.A., Nell M. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2014. V. 53. P. 2058. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic4025926
  13. Kim J.H., Reeder E., Parkin S., Awuah S.G. // Sci. Rep. 2019. V. 9. P. 12335. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48584-5
  14. Landini I., Lapucci A., Pratesi A. et al. // Oncotarget 2017. V. 8. P. 96062. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.21708
  15. Walz D.T., DiMartino M.J., Griswold D.E. et al. // Am. J. Med. 1983. V. 75. P. 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)90481-3
  16. Chrysouli M.P., Banti C.N., Kourkoumelis N. et al. // J. Inorg. Biochem. 2018. V. 179. P. 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2017.11.004
  17. Кращенко Т.Г., Введенский А.В., Бобринская Е.В., Кулешова Н.Е. // Конденсированные среды и межфазные границы. Т. 16. № 1. С. 42.
  18. Obradors C., Echavarren A.M. // Chem. Commun. 2014. V. 50. P. 16. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc45518a
  19. Mézailles N., Ricard L., Gagosz F. // Org. Lett. 2005. V. 7. P. 4133. https://doi.org/10.1021/ol0515917
  20. Křikavová R., Hošek J., Vančo J. et al. // PLoS One. 2014. 9(9): e107373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107373
  21. Caruso F., Rossi M., Tanski J. et al. // J. Med. Chem. 2003. V. 46. P. 1737. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm0204690
  22. Dickson P.N., Wehrli A., Geier G. // Inorg. Chem. 1988. V. 27. P. 2921. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00290a006
  23. Shaw III C.F., Isab A.A., Hoeschele J.D. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994. V. 116. P. 2254. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00085a003
  24. Hormann-Arendt A.L., Shaw III C.F. // Inorg. Chem. 1990. V. 29. P. 4683. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00348a019
  25. Hormann-Arendt A.L., Shaw III C.F., Bennett D.W., Reiff W.M. // Inorg. Chem. 1986. V. 25. P. 3953. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00242a025
  26. Ahmad S. // Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004. V. 248. P. 231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2003.10.015
  27. Белеванцев В.И., Пещевицкий Б.И. Исследование сложных равновесий в растворе. Новосибирск: Наука, 1978. 254 с.
  28. Albert A., Brauckmann C., Blaske F. et al. // Anal. At. Spectrom. 2012. V. 27. P. 975. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JA30109A
  29. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu. // J. Solution Chem. 2020. V. 49. P. 583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-020-00994-0
  30. Миронов И.В., Харламова В.Ю. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2017. Т. 62. № 7. С. 1008. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044457X17070157
  31. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu. // J. Solution Chem. 2018. V. 47. P. 511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-018-0735-y
  32. Coffer M.T., Shaw III C.F., Eidsness M.K. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 1986. V. 25. P. 333. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00223a020
  33. Rakhimov R.D., Butin K.P., Grandberg K.I. // J. Organomet. Chem. 1994. V. 464. P. 253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-328X(94)87282-1
  34. Anderson J.E., Sawtelle S.M., McAndrews C.E. // Inorg. Chem. 1990. V. 29. P. 2627. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic00339a020
  35. Mohamed A.A., Bruce A.E., Bruce M.R. // The chemistry of organic derivatives of gold and silver / Eds. Patai S., Rappoport Z. John Wiley & Sons, 1999. P. 313.
  36. Garusinghe G.S.P., Bessey S.M., Aghamoosa M. et al. // Inorganics. 2015. V. 3. P. 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics3010040
  37. Garusinghe G.S.P., Bessey S.M., Bruce A.E., Bruce M.R.M. // Dalton Trans. 2016. V. 45. P. 11261. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6dt01400c
  38. Coffer M.T., Shaw III C.F., Hormann A.L. et al. // J. Inorg. Biochem. 1987. V. 30. P. 177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-0134(87)80062-4
  39. Mironov I.V., Kharlamova V.Yu. // ChemistrySelect. 2023. V. 8. P. e202301337. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202301337
  40. Миронов И.В., Харламова В.Ю. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 10. С. 1495. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600639
  41. Pacheco E.A., Tiekink E.R.T., Whitehouse M.W. Gold Chemistry: Applications and Future Directions in the Life Sciences. Ch. 6: Gold Compounds and Their Applications in Medicine. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, 2009. P. 304. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527626724.ch6
  42. Kimura E., Kurogi Y., Koike T. et al. // J. Coord. Chem. 1993. V. 28. P. 33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958979308035142
  43. Gabbiani C., Casini A., Messori L. // Gold Bull. 2007. V. 40. P. 73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03215296
  44. Che C.-M., Sun R.W.-Y., Yu W.-Y. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2003. P. 1718. https://doi.org/10.1039/b303294a
  45. Jamin M.E., Ivamoto R.T. // Inorganica Chim. Acta. 1978. V. 27. P. 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1693(00)87273-4
  46. Berners-Price S.J., Sadler P.J. // Phosphines and metal phosphine complexes: relationship of chemistry to anticancer and other biological activity in structure and bonding. 1988. V. 70. P. 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-50130-4_2

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Change in the UV spectrum of AuCl(PPh3) solution in 50% AN with the addition of GSH (pH 7.4, l = 1 cm). CAu = 1.34 × 10-4 M, CGSH (10-5 M): 0 (1); 3.2 (2); 6.4 (3); 9.6 (4); 12.8–230 (5). Spectrum 6 – PPh3 (9.11 × 10-5 M) (a). Change in A/lCAu at λ = 260 nm. CAu (10-4 M): 1.34 (Δ), 0.52 (O). 1 is the calculated curve, 2 is the estimated change for mononuclear forms, 3 is the estimated change for the binuclear form, l = 1 cm (b).

Download (281KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. The change in the UV spectrum of the solution during the interaction of AuCl(PPh3) with cysteine. CAu = 1.34 × 10-4 M, CCys (10-4 M): 0 (1); 0.35 (2); 0.67 (3); 1.0–12 (4). pH 7.4, 50% AN, l = 1 cm.

Download (71KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Color-grams of solutions containing AuCl(PPh3) (CAu = 1.0 × 10-3 M) and GSH. CGSH/CAu: 0 (1); 0.4/1 (2); 0.9/1 (3). Dependences (4) and (5) relate to solutions of GSH and PPh3 (C = 1.0 × 10-3 M). All solutions contain 0.1 M LiClO4, AN (80%), H2O (20%). a is 1 × 10-3 M HCl, b is 1 × 10-3 M HClO4. E relative to the Ag+/Ag electrode, the scanning speed is 100 mV/s.

Download (134KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Changes in UV spectra during the interaction of AuCl(PPh3) with BSA (1%) in AN (37%) in the presence of Cys (2.0 × 10-4 M). 1 – 1% BSA; 2 – 1% BSA + 1.0 × 10-4 M AuCl(PPh3) τ = 0; 3 – 1.0 × 10-4 M AuCl(PPh3) without BSA; 4-7 – A2–A1 difference spectra for τ (min) after mixing: 0 (4), 10 (5), 30 (6), 60 (7), l = 0.2 cm.

Download (68KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Scheme 1.

Download (17KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences