PROLONGATION OF STIMULUS REPRESENTATION IN THE BRAIN AS A PROBABLE MECHANISM OF ASSOCIATIVE PLASTICITY IMPLEMENTATION DURING SEMANTIC LEARNING

B. V. Chernyshev; Чернышев Б. В.; A. A. Pavlova; Павлова А. А.; A. M. Rytikova; Рытикова А. М.; A. V. Butorina; Буторина А. В.; T. A. Stroganova; Строганова Т. А.

doi:10.31857/S0044467723060035

PROLONGATION OF STIMULUS REPRESENTATION IN THE BRAIN AS A PROBABLE MECHANISM OF ASSOCIATIVE PLASTICITY IMPLEMENTATION DURING SEMANTIC LEARNING

Authors: Chernyshev B.V.¹^,2, Pavlova A.A.¹^,3, Rytikova A.M.¹, Butorina A.V.¹^,4, Stroganova T.A.¹
Affiliations:
1. Moscow Center of Neurocognitive Research (MEG-center), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2. Department of Higher Nervous Activity, Lomonosov Moscow State University
3. Department of Psychology, National research university Higher School of Economics
4. Center for Neurobiology and Brain Restoration, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
Issue: Vol 73, No 6 (2023)
Pages: 764-784
Section: ФИЗИОЛОГИЯ ВЫСШЕЙ НЕРВНОЙ (КОГНИТИВНОЙ) ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ЧЕЛОВЕКА
URL: https://ruspoj.com/0044-4677/article/view/652004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044467723060035
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BBRFDQ
ID: 652004

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

It is believed that memorization of the meaning of new words occurs due to associative learning. For example, it may be matching of a word to the corresponding motor act. Synaptic plasticity in the brain develops on condition that activity of cell ensembles representing the associated events coincides in time – however, in reality, during the development of such associations, a significant time gap between the associated events is likely, which compromises necessary conditions for synaptic plasticity. We hypothesized that conditions for the development of synaptic plasticity may be created by way of prolongation in the activity of neuronal representations, thus providing for the required overlap in time at the level of neuronal ensembles. To test this assumption, we recorded magnetoencephalogram in volunteers during acquisition of associations between pseudowords and movements by four limbs. The results of the study show that there indeed occurs a significant prolongation of stimulus-induced auditory speech activation during the development of new associations. Thus, during the development of the association in the brain, the necessary conditions for Hebbian plasticity can be created – even if the events being associated are separated in time.

Keywords

associative learning, reinforcement learning, memory, action words, evoked fields, magnetoencephalography

References

Разоренова А.М., Скавронская В.В., Тюленев Н.Б., Рытикова А.М., Чернышев Б.В. Может ли научение новым словам в слуховой модальности вести к быстрому формированию пластических перестроек в коре больших полушарий у взрослых? Современная зарубежная психология. 2020. 9 (2): 46–56.
Barsalou L. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2003. 18 (5–6): 513–562.
Deacon D., Shelley-Tremblay J. How automatically is meaning accessed: a review of the effects of attention on semantic processing. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark. 2000. 5 (4): 82–94.
Erlbeck H., Kübler A., Kotchoubey B., Veser S. Task instructions modulate the attentional mode affecting the auditory MMN and the semantic N400. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014. V. 8. P. 654.
Friederici A.D., Chomsky N., Berwick R.C., Moro A., Bolhuis J.J. Language, mind and brain. Nature Human Behaviour. 2017. 1 (100): 713–722.
Funahashi S., Bruce C.J., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey’s dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1989. 61 (2): 331–349.
Fuster J.M., Bressler S.L. Past Makes Future: Role of pFC in Prediction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2015. 27 (4): 639–654.
Gallistel C.R., Fairhurst S., Balsam P. The learning curve: implications of a quantitative analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004. 101 (36): 13124–13131.
Gramfort A., Luessi M., Larson E., Engemann D.A., Strohmeier D., Brodbeck C., Goj R., Jas M., Brooks T., Parkkonen L. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2013. P. 267.
Gross J., Baillet S., Barnes G.R., Henson R.N., Hillebrand A., Jensen O., Jerbi K., Litvak V., Maess B., Oostenveld R., Parkkonen L., Taylor J.R., van Wassenhove V., Wibral M., Schoffelen J.M. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage. 2013. V. 65. P. 349–363.
Hebb D.O. The organization of behavior : a neuropsychological theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1949. 335 c.
Histed M.H., Pasupathy A., Miller E.K. Learning Substrates in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Striatum: Sustained Activity Related to Successful Actions. Neuron. 2009. 63 (2): 244–253.
Jensen O., Tesche C.D. Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task. Eur.J.Neurosci. 2002. 15 (8): 1395–1399.
Kutas M., Federmeier K.D. Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 62 / Fiske S. T. et al. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, 2011. C. 621–647.
Lang M., Lang W., Uhl F., Kornhuber A., Deecke L., Kornhuber H.H. Slow negative potential shifts indicating verbal cognitive learning in a concept formation task. Human Neurobiology. 1987. 6: 183–190.
McCarthy G., Nobre A., Bentin S., Spencer D. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I. Intracranial distribution and neural generators. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1995. 15 (2): 1080–1089.
Miyashita Y., Chang H.S. Neuronal correlate of pictorial short-term memory in the primate temporal cortex. Nature. 1988. V. 331. № 6151. P. 68–70.
Naya Y., Yoshida M., Takeda M., Fujimichi R., Miyashita Y. Delay-period activities in two subdivisions of monkey inferotemporal cortex during pair association memory task. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2003. 18 (10): 2915–2918.
Neuringer A. Operant variability: Evidence, functions, and theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2002. 9 (4): 672–705.
O’Rourke T.B., Holcomb P.J. Electrophysiological evidence for the efficiency of spoken word processing. Biological Psychology. 2002. 60 (2–3): 121–150.
Pearce J.M., Hall G. A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychol.Rev. 1980. 87 (6): 532–552.
Pearce J.M., Mackintosh N.J. Two theories of attention: A review and a possible integration. Attention and associative learning: From brain to behaviour. 2010. P. 11–39.
Picard N., Strick P.L. Imaging the premotor areas. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2001. 11 (6): 663–672.
Pinal D., Zurrón M., Díaz F. Effects of load and maintenance duration on the time course of information encoding and retrieval in working memory: from perceptual analysis to post-categorization processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2014. V. 8. P. 165.
Postle N., McMahon K.L., Ashton R., Meredith M., de Zubicaray G.I. Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. Neuroimage. 2008. 43 (3): 634–644.
Pulvermüller F. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2005. 6 (7): 576–582.
Pulvermüller F. Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Progress in Neurobiology. 2018. 160: 1–44.
Quintana J., Fuster J.M. From Perception to Action: Temporal Integrative Functions of Prefrontal and Parietal Neurons. Cerebral Cortex. 1999. V. 9. № 3. P. 213–221.
Razorenova A.M., Chernyshev B.V., Nikolaeva A.Y., Butorina A.V., Prokofyev A.O., Tyulenev N.B., Stroganova T.A. Rapid Cortical Plasticity Induced by Active Associative Learning of Novel Words in Human Adults. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020. V. 14. P. 895.
Shtyrov Y., Butorina A., Nikolaeva A., Stroganova T. Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014. 111 (18): E1918–E1923.
Shu Y., Hasenstaub A., McCormick D.A. Turning on and off recurrent balanced cortical activity. Nature. 2003. 423 (6937): 288–293.
Smith M.E., Stapleton J.M., Halgren E. Human medial temporal lobe potentials evoked in memory and language tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1986. 63 (2): 145–159.
Tadel F., Baillet S., Mosher J.C., Pantazis D., Leahy R.M. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Computational intelligence and neuroscience. 2011. V. 2011. P. 879716.
Takeda M., Naya Y., Fujimichi R., Takeuchi D., Miyashita Y. Active Maintenance of Associative Mnemonic Signal in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex. Neuron. 2005. 48 (5): 839–848.
Taulu S., Simola J., Kajola M. Applications of the signal space separation method. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing. 2005. 53 (9): 3359–3372.
Tomasello R., Garagnani M., Wennekers T., Pulvermuller F. Brain connections of words, perceptions and actions: A neurobiological model of spatio-temporal semantic activation in the human cortex. Neuropsychologia. 2017. V. 98. P. 111–129.
Travis K.E., Leonard M.K., Chan A.M., Torres C., Sizemore M.L., Qu Z., Eskandar E., Dale A.M., Elman J.L., Cash S.S., Halgren E. Independence of Early Speech Processing from Word Meaning. Cerebral Cortex. 2012. V. 23. № 10. P. 2370–2379.
Uusitalo M.A., Ilmoniemi R.J. Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing. 1997. 35 (2): 135–140.
Van Petten C., Luka B.J. Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies. Brain and Language. 2006. 97 (3): 279–293.