The attitude to nails as a representation of the boundary of the bodily Self

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The concepts of “cultural skin” and “second skin” are discussed as two behavioral patterns of Ego protection and representation of the boundaries of the bodily Self based on the relationship to nails. Two forms of manifestation of the second skin (encapsulation/fusion) are distinguished. The phenomenon of representing the bodily Self boundary as a combination of encapsulation/fusion is obtained. The online study involved 464 women who first answered the questions and identified themselves in three categories (nail biting, long nails, neat nails). Then it was necessary to perform blank methods: “Diagnosis of the bodily Self” (I.V. Lybko), “Self structural test of G. Ammon” (ISTA). According to the results of the analysis, the sample was divided into four categories depending on the measure of affective attitude towards nails and patterns of behavior towards the nail plate (nail care/self-harm). Using the Kruskal-Wallis test, it is proved that the attitude to nails is associated with different ways of representing the boundaries of the bodily self.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

T. Rebeko

Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: rebekota@yandex.ru

PhD (Psychology), Leading researcher, V.N. Druzhinin Laboratory of Psychology of Abilities and Mental Resources

Ресей, 129366, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldg. 1

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Anz’e D. Ja-kozha. Izhevsk: ERGO, 2011. (In Russian)
  2. Beskova D.A., Tkhostov A.Sh. Telesnost’ kak prostranstvennaja struktura. Psikhologija telesnosti. Mezhdu dushojj i telom. Eds. V.P. Zinchenko, T.S. Levi. Moscow: AST, 2005. P. 236–252. (In Russian)
  3. Lybko I.V. Metodika “Diagnostika telesnogo Ja”. Psikhologicheskaja diagnostika. 2008. № 3. P. 5–21. (In Russian)
  4. Onto- i sub”ektogenez psikhicheskogo razvitija cheloveka. Eds. N.E. Kharlamenkova, V.V. Znakov, E.A. Sergienko, N.N. Kazymova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2022. (In Russian)
  5. Ocherki dinamicheskojj psikhiatrii. Eds. M.M. Kabanov, N.G. Neznanov. Saint-Petersburg: Institut im. V.M. Bekhtereva, 2003. (In Russian)
  6. Podoroga V. Fenomenologija tela. Vvedenie v filosofskuju antropologiju. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 1995. (In Russian)
  7. Rebeko T.A. Psikhosomatika kozhnykh zabolevanijj i reprezentacija psikhicheskogo prostranstva. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2022. V. 43. № 4. P. 59–69. (In Russian)
  8. Rozenfel’d D. Dusha, razum i psikhoanalitik. Sozdanie psikhoanaliticheskogo settinga s pacientami s psikhoticheskimi aspektami lichnosti. Khar’kov: Planeta-Print, 2015. (In Russian)
  9. Ad-Dab’bagh Ya. Puncturing the skin of the self: A psychoanalytic perspective on why prejudice hurts. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalitic Studies. 2012. V. 9. № 1. P. 23–34.
  10. Alexandrov Yu.I., Sams M.E. Emotions and consciousness: Ends of a continuum. Cognitive Brain Research. 2005. V. 25. Р. 387–405.
  11. Amir D. The malignant ambiguity of incestuous language. International Journal of Psychoanalysis Open. 2018. V. 5. P. 1–27.
  12. Anzieu-Premmereur C. The skin-ego: Dyadic sensuality, trauma in infancy, and adult narcissistic issues. The Psychoanalytic Review. 2015. V. 102. № 5. P. 659–681.
  13. Balottin L., Quagelli L., Costantini M.V. A body of one’s own: From self-cutting to the cuts of separation in an adolescent suffering from traumatic early abandonments. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 2021. V. 69. № 1. P. 109–135.
  14. Boćwińska-Kiluk B. “Venus in Scars” — Implications regarding self-harm pathogenesis in adolescent girl in object relation theory perspective. International Journal of Psychoanalysis Open. 2021.V. 8. № 26. P. 1–16.
  15. Diena S. Emptiness in bulimia: Clinical vicissitudes and theoretical implications. Romanian Journal of Psychoanalysis. 2015. V. 8. № 2. P. 183–215.
  16. Durban J. “Making a Person”: Clinical considerations regarding the interpretation of anxieties in the analyses of children on the autisto-psychotic spectrum. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 2019. V. 100. № 5. P. 921–939.
  17. Feldman B. The Cultural skin in Latin America. Listening to Latin America. Eds. P. Amezaga, G. Barcellos, A. Capriles, J. Gerson, D. Ramos. New Orleans, Louisiana: Spring Journal Books, 2012. P. 109–128.
  18. Frydman S. Shifting skins: Love and breakdown. Studies in Gender and Sexuality. 2018. V. 19. № 3. P. 204–216.
  19. Goldblatt M.J., Maltsberger J.T. Self attack as a means of self-preservation. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies. 2010. V. 7. P. 58–72.
  20. Hafner D. Building Castles Made of Pleasure. Psychoanalytic Review. 2018. V. 105. № 3. P. 279–302.
  21. Karacaoglan U. Tattoo and taboo: On the meaning of tattoos in the analytic process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 2012. V. 93. № 1. P. 5–28.
  22. Kholodnaya M.A., Sipovskaya Ya.I. Elements of sensory-emotional experience as an integral part of forming visual meanings: The role of conceptual abilities. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2021. V. 14. № 2. P. 76–89.
  23. Moscato F., Solano P. Eating disorders as autistic like defenses: unmentalizable experiences in primitive mental states. Psychoanalytic Review. 2014. V. 101. № 4. P. 547–570.
  24. Movahedi S., Homayounpour G. The couch and the chador. International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 2012. V. 93. № 6. P. 1357–1375.
  25. Nice T. I bleed therefore I am: Pain, restoration and repair in self-cutting. Journal of Psychological Therapies. 2018. V. 3. № 2. P. 15–20.
  26. Schellekes A. The dread of falling — Between breaking one’s back and breaking through: Commentary on Franco Borgogno’s “On the patient’s becoming an individual”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues. 2005. V. 15. № 6. P. 897–908.
  27. Schellekes А. Writing as a protective shell: The analysis of a young writer. Modern Psychoanalysis. 2006. V. 31. № 2. P. 251–288.
  28. Steele M., Steele H., Beebe B. Applying an attachment and microanalytic lens to “embodied mentalization”: Commentary on “Mentalizing homeostasis: The social origins of interoceptive inference” by Fotopoulou and Tsakiris. Neuropsychoanalysis. 2017. V. 19. № 1. P. 59–66.
  29. Werbart A. “The skin is the cradle of the soul”: Didier Anzieu on the skin-ego, boundaries, and boundlessness. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association. 2019. V. 67. № 1. P. 37–58.
  30. Wierzbicka A. Bodies and their parts: An NSM approach to semantic typology. Language Sciences. 2007. V. 29. № 1. P. 14–65.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024