Open Government mechanisms as a way to increase openness, accountability and anti-corruption in Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the need for openness, transparency, accountability of government bodies, as well for the dialogue between society and the state regarding the implementation of management decisions. The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the relationship between the level of openness and the efficiency of public administration, supporting anti-corruption, including on the basis of foreign experience. The empirical basis of the research is the mechanism of "open government" that was implemented in 2011 in more than 70 countries including Russia, and analyzed by the author. The result of the research is the preparation of a methodological and organizational model for evaluating and carrying out international and new initiatives that have been successfully implemented in the field of public administration.

About the authors

Egor Aleksandrovich Artemenko

Higher School of Economics (HSE University)

Russian Federation, 101000, Moscow, Myasnitskaya str., 20

References

  1. Беляева А.Д. Зарубежный опыт становления и развития информационного общества (Эстония) // Гуманитарный акцент. 2019. № 4. С. 29–34.
  2. Блауберг И.И. Бергсон // Философская антропология. 2019. № 2. С. 118–135.
  3. Ефимов А.А. Электронное правительство Японии в контексте внутренней и внешней политики государства // ЭСГИ. 2015. № 3 (7). С. 101–107.
  4. Касаткина Н.М. Открытое правительство за рубежом. Правовое регулирование и практика: монография // ИНФРА-М. 2022. XXIV. – 234 с. URL: www.dx.doi.org/10.12737/7198
  5. Клименко А.С., Лезина Е.П. Концепция "открытого общества" Карла Поппера // Контентус. 2018. № 1 (66). – 7 с.
  6. Пименов Н.А. Проблемы коррупции в России // Финансы: теория и практика. 2011. № 4. С. 21–26.
  7. Полтерович В.М. Трансплантация экономических институтов // Экономическая наука современной России. 2001. № 3. С. 24–50.
  8. Bovens M., Hart P. (2016) Revisiting the study of policy failures, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:5, 653-666. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1127273
  9. Cuéllar, M-F, Stephenson M. (2020) Taming Systemic Corruption: The American Experience and its Implications for Contemporary Debates. Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 20–29.
  10. Hellmann O. (2017) The historical origins of corruption in the developing world: a comparative analysis of East Asia. Crime Law Soc Change 68, 145–165. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-016-9679-6
  11. Howlett M., Mukherjee I. (2014) Policy design and non-design: Towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 57–71.
  12. McConnell A. (2012) Understanding policy success. Rethinking public policy// Public Administration. 90 (4). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02057.x
  13. Nort D. (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. New York.
  14. Popa M. (2015) Elites and Corruption: A Theory of Endogenous Reform and a Test Using British Data. World Politics, 67(2), 313–352. URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000040
  15. Rhodes R.A.W., Marsh D. (1992) Policy network in British politics. A critique of existing approaches // Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  16. Roland G. (2000) Transition and Economics. Politics, Markets and Firms. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  17. Schudson M. (2006) The Trouble with Experts – and Why Democracies Need Them.
  18. Stiglitz J. (2000) Scan globally, reinvent locally: knowledge infrastructure and the localization of knowledge. In: Diane Stone (ed.) Banking on Knowledge. The Genesis of the Global Development Network. Рp. 24–43.
  19. Wijnhoven F., Ehrenhard M., Kuhn J. (2020) The survival of open government platforms: Empirical insights from a global sample. Government Information Quarterly 38(1).
  20. Zhenbin Y., Kankanhalli A., Ha S., Kumar Tayi G. (2020) What drives public agencies to participate in open government data initiatives? an innovation resource perspective. Inf. Manage. 57. 3. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.103179

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Russian Academy of Sciences