Temperature influence of metamaterials based on flexible TPU 95A plastic on resistance to penetration by a rigid striker

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The mechanical properties of metamaterials with a cellular chiral internal structure were experimentally studied during normal penetration by a rigid spherical striker. The metamaterial samples were 3D printed from TPU 95A plastic (thermoplastic polyurethane). They had auxetic and non-auxetic chiral structures of cells in the form of concave and convex hexagons, respectively. The results of the experiments on sample penetration, conducted for two temperature and two speed modes, are presented. The relative loss of kinetic energy of the striker during penetration of auxetic samples was significantly higher than that of non-auxetic ones. It was found that for the studied types of flexible metamaterials, the resistance to striker penetration increases with increasing temperature in the considered temperature range. The dependence of the striker deviation on exit from the flexible sample on the type of chirality of the structure being penetrated was established.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

S. Ivanova

Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics RAS

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: lisovenk@ipmnet.ru
Ресей, Moscow

K. Osipenko

Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics RAS

Email: lisovenk@ipmnet.ru
Ресей, Moscow

N. Banichuk

Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics RAS

Email: lisovenk@ipmnet.ru
Ресей, Moscow

D. Lisovenko

Ishlinsky Institute for Problems in Mechanics RAS

Email: lisovenk@ipmnet.ru
Ресей, Moscow

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Lim T.-C. Auxetic Materials and Structures. Singapore: Springer, 2015. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-275-3
  2. Kolken H.M.A., Zadpoor A.A. Auxetic Mechanical Metamaterials // RSC Adv. 2017. V. 7. № 9. P. 5111–5129. http://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA27333E
  3. Ren X., Das R., Tran P. et al. Auxetic Metamaterials and Structures: A Review // Smart Mater. Struct. 2018. V. 27. № 2. P. 023001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aaa61c
  4. Wu W., Hu W., Qian G. et al. Mechanical design and multifunctional applications of chiral mechanical metamaterials: A review // Mater. Des. 2019. V. 180. P. 107950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107950
  5. Gorodtsov V.A., Lisovenko D.S. Auxetics among materials with cubic anisotropy // Mech. Solids. 2020. V. 55. № 4. P. 461–474. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654420040044
  6. Shitikova M.V. Fractional operator viscoelastic models in dynamic problems of mechanics of solids: A Review // Mech. Solids. 2022. V. 57. N 1. P. 1–33. http://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654422010022
  7. Novak N., Vesenjak M., Ren Z. Auxetic cellular materials-a review // Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2016. V. 62. № 9. P. 485–493. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2016.3656
  8. Kelkar P.U., Kim H.S., Cho K.-H. et. al. Cellular Auxetic Structures for Mechanical Metamaterials: A Review // Sensors. 2020. V. 20. № 11. P. 3132. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113132
  9. Joseph A., Manesh V., Harursampath D. On the application of additive manufacturing methods for auxetic structures: A review // Adv. Manuf. 2021. V. 9. № 3. P. 342–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-021-00357-y
  10. Ivanova S.Yu., Osipenko K.Yu., Kuznetsov V. A., Solovyov N.G., Banichuk N.V., Lisovenko D.S. Experimental investigation of the properties of auxetic and non-auxetic metamaterials made of metal during penetration of rigid strikers // Mech. Solids. 2023. V. 58. № 2. P. 524–528. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654422601616
  11. Ivanova S.Yu., Osipenko K.Yu., Demin A.I., Banichuk N.V., Lisovenko D.S. Studying the properties of metamaterials with a negative Poisson’s ratio when punched by a rigid impactor // Mech. Solids. 2023. V. 58. № 5. P. 1536–1544. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654423600897
  12. Ivanova S.Yu., Osipenko K.Yu., Banichuk N.V., Lisovenko D.S. Experimental study of the properties of metamaterials based on PLA plastic when perforated by a rigid striker // Mech. Solids. 2024. V. 59. № 4. P. 1967–1972. http://doi.org/10.1134/S0025654424604695
  13. Ivanova S.Yu., Osipenko K.Yu., Banichuk N.V., Lisovenko D.S. // Mech. Solids. 2024. V. 59. № 7. P. 3727–3734. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0025654424606633
  14. Gao Y., Huang H. Energy absorption and gradient of hybrid honeycomb structure with negative Poisson’s ratio // Mech. Solids. 2022. V. 57. № 5. P. 1118–1133. http://doi.org/10.3103/S0025654422050053
  15. Хing Y., Deng B., Cao M. et al. Influence of structural and morphological variations in orthogonal trapezoidal aluminum honeycomb on quasi-static mechanical properties // Mech. Solids. 2024. V. 59. № 1. P. 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0025654423602550
  16. Skripnyak V.V., Chirkov M.O., Skripnyak V.A. Modeling the mechanical response of auxetic metamaterials to dynamic effects // Vestn. PNIPU. Mekh. 2021. № 2. P. 144–152. http://doi.org/10.15593/perm.mech/2021.2.13
  17. Imbalzano G., Tran P., Lee P.V.S. et. al. Influences of material and geometry in the performance of auxetic composite structure under blast loading // Appl. Mech. Mater. 2016. V. 846. P. 476–481. http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.846.476
  18. Zhao X., Gao Q., Wang L. et. al. Dynamic crushing of double-arrowed auxetic structure un-der impact loading // Mater. Des. 2018. V. 160. P. 527–537. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.041
  19. Li C., Shen H.S., Wang H. Nonlinear dynamic response of sandwich plates with functionally graded auxetic 3D lattice core // Nonlinear Dyn. 2020. V. 100. P. 3235–3252. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05686-4
  20. Qiao J.X., Chen C.Q. Impact resistance of uniform and functionally graded auxetic double arrowhead honeycombs // Inter. J. Impact Eng. 2015. V. 83. P. 47–58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.04.005
  21. Novak N., Starcevic L., Vesenjak M. et. al. Blast response study of the sandwich composite panels with 3D chiral auxetic core // Compos. Struct. 2019. V. 210. P. 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.050
  22. Yu Y., Fu T., Wang S., Yang C. Dynamic response of novel sandwich structures with 3D sinusoid-parallel-hybrid honeycomb auxetic cores: The cores based on negative Poisson’s ratio of elastic jump // Eur. J. Mech. – A/Solids. 2025. V. 109. P. 105449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2024.105449
  23. Shen Z.Y., Wen Y.K., Shen L.Y. et. al. Dynamic response and energy absorption characteristics of auxetic concave honeycomb pad for ballistic helmet under shock wave and bullet impact // Mech. Solids. 2024. V. 59. № 5. P. 3050–3067. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0025654424605159
  24. Jiang Q., Hao B., Chen G. et. al. Analysis of the penetration ability of exponential bullets on TPMS structures with variable density // Mech. Solids. 2024. V. 59. № 5. P. 3198–3211. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0025654424605640

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Dependence of the relative loss of kinetic energy of the impactor d (%) on the mass m [g] of the pierced chiral auxetic (a) and nonauxetic (b) samples: at flight speeds of 150 and 190 m/s.

Жүктеу (132KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Dependence of the relative loss of kinetic energy of the impactor d (%) on the mass m [g] of the pierced chiral auxetic and nonauxetic samples: at flight speeds of 150 m/s (a) and 190 m/s (b).

Жүктеу (112KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Dependence of the relative kinetic energy loss of the impactor d (%) on the mass m [g] of the punched chiral auxetic and non-auxetic samples from TPU 95A and PLA plastics at flight speeds of 150 m/s and a temperature of 16 °C.

Жүктеу (66KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Deviation of the direction of movement of the impactor at the exit of the samples from the approach: chiral (“/”) auxetic sample (94/90, Table. 2), downward deviation of ∼3° (a); chiral (“\”) nonauxetic sample (125/111, Table. 3), upward deviation of ∼3° (b).

Жүктеу (187KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025