Obtaining Magnesium Nanoparticles by Receiving Flow Levitation

A. N. Markov; Марков А. Н.; I. V. Vorotyntsev; Воротынцев И. В.; P. P. Grachev; Грачев П. П.; A. A. Atlaskin; Атласкин А. А.; V. M. Vorotyntsev; Воротынцев В. М.; G. M. Kleiman; Клейман Г. М.; A. V. Barysheva; Барышева А. В.; S. S. Suvorov; Суворов С. С.; A. A. Kapinos; Капинос А. А.; A. V. Vorotyntsev; Воротынцев А. В.

doi:10.31857/S1028096023100138

Obtaining Magnesium Nanoparticles by Receiving Flow Levitation

Authors: Markov A.N.¹, Vorotyntsev I.V.², Grachev P.P.³, Atlaskin A.A.², Vorotyntsev V.M.³, Kleiman G.M.¹, Barysheva A.V.¹, Suvorov S.S.¹, Kapinos A.A.¹, Vorotyntsev A.V.¹
Affiliations:
1. Nizhny Novgorod State University N.I. Lobachevsky
2. Russian University of Chemical Technology D.I. Mendeleev
3. Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, R.E. Alekseeva
Issue: No 12 (2023)
Pages: 147-152
Section: Articles
URL: https://ruspoj.com/1028-0960/article/view/664711
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S1028096023100138
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PIRZPK
ID: 664711

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

Due to the development of the chemical industry, the need to obtain high-purity monodisperse nanoparticles is increasing. Therefore, it is necessary to choose the right method of obtaining. The paper demonstrates a unique method – induction flow levitation, which allows to obtain a large list of metal nanoparticles on one installation. In this work, magnesium nanoparticles were obtained using this method. The morphology was studied using scanning electron microscopy, where the resulting nanoparticles were clusters of primary particles. Energy dispersive analysis showed that the surface of magnesium nanoparticles after interaction with atmospheric air is completely covered with a small layer of oxide. Analysis of the phase composition showed that the powder consists of magnesium without traces of oxide. Mass spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma showed the purity of the obtained particles 99.99%. The characteristics of the porous structure were determined by low temperature porosimetry. The size of the obtained particles did not exceed 40 nm, and the average size was 23 nm. The used method of obtaining nanoparticles demonstrated high productivity (up to 50 g/h) and continuity of the process of obtaining nanoparticles (NP), the ability to control the size of the obtained nanoparticles (NP) in a wide range, non-contact heating, which leads to a high purity of the resulting product confirmed by mass spectrometry with inductive plasma bound.

Keywords

magnesium, nanoparticles, induction flow levitation, high-temperature synthesis, porosimetry.

References

Panova T.V., Kovivchak V.S. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2021. V. 15. № 1. P. 157. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S102745102202032X
Zhang X., Yang R., Yang J., Zhao W., Zheng J., Tian W., Li X. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2011. V. 36. Iss. 8. P. 4967. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2010.12.052
Wagemans R.W.P., van Lenthe J.H., de Jongh P.E., van Dillen A.J., de Jong K.P. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005. V. 127. № 47. P. 16675. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/JA054569H
Liu Y., Zhu J., Liu Z., Zhu Y., Zhang J., Li L. // Front. Chem. 2020. V. 7. P. 949. https://www.doi.org/10.3389/FCHEM.2019.00949
KA W., RP V.D. // Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007. V. 58. P. 267. https://www.doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.PHYSCHEM. 58.032806.104607
Biggins J.S., Yazdi S., Ringe E. // Nano Lett. 2018. V. 18 № 6. P. 3752. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/ACS.NANOLETT.8B00955
Hyeon-Ho Jeong G., Mark A., Peer Fischer // Chem. Commun. 2016. V. 52. № 82. P. 12179. https://www.doi.org/10.1039/C6CC06800F
Ringe E. // J. Phys. Chem. C. Nanomater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 124. № 29. P. 15665. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JPCC.0C03871
Peng H., Zhu L., Zhang Z. // PP Composites. 2012. V. 11. № 3. P. 231. https://www.doi.org/10.1163/1568554041526558
Aksenova V.V., Kanunnikova O.M., Burnyshev I.N., Pushkarev B.E., Ladyanov V.I. // J. Surf. Invest.: X-ray, Synchrotron Neutron Tech. 2022. V. 16 № 1. P. 68. https://www.doi.org/10.1134/S1027451022010025
Mostafa A.M., Okil M., ElFaham M.M., Mostafa A.M., Mostafa A.M. // JOSA B. 2020. V. 37. № 9. P. 2620. https://www.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.398543
Haas I., Gedanken A. // Chem. Commun. 2008. № 15. P. 1795. https://www.doi.org/10.1039/B717670H
Sergeev G.B. // J. Nanoparticle Res. 2003. V. 5. № 5. P. 529. https://www.doi.org/10.1023/B:NANO.0000006153. 65107.42
Aurbach D., Lu Z., Schechter Z., Gofer Y., Gizbar H., Turgeman R., Cohen Y., Moshkovich M., Levi E. // Nature. 2000. V. 407 № 6805. P. 724–727. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/35037553
Kisza A., Kaźmierczak J., Borresen B., Haarberg G.M., Tunold R. // J. Appl. Electrochem. 1993 V. 25 № 10. P. 940. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/BF00241588
Markov A.N., Vorotyntsev A.V., Kapinos A.A., Petukhov A.N., Pryakhina V.I., Kazarina O.V., Atlaskin A.A., Otvagina K.V., Vorotyntsev V.M., Vorotyntsev I.V. // ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022. V. 10 № 24. P. 7929. https://www.doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG. 2C00940
Zhigach A.N., Leipunsky I.O., Kuskov M.L., Berezkina N.G., Afanasenkova E.S., Safronova O.A., Kudrov B.V., Lopez G.W., Skryleva E.A. // J. Alloys Compd. 2020. V. 819. P. 153054. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2019.153054
Aravindan S., Rao P.V., Ponappa K. // J. Magnes. Alloy. 2015. V. 3 № 1. P. 52. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/J.JMA.2014.12.008
Zheng X.M., Duan X.N., Sun Y.Y., Shang H.J. // Sol. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014. V. 997. P. 312. https://www.doi.org/10.4028/WWW.SCIENTIFIC.NET/ AMR.997.312
Vassileva E., Furuta N. // J. Anal. Chem. 2001. V. 370. № 1. P. 52. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/S002160100744
Morozov A.G., Martemyanova T.V., Dodonov V.A., Kazarina O.V., Fedushkin I.L. // Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019. V. 2019. Iss. 39–40. P. 4198–4204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201900715