On the textual problems of publishing the novel “Demons” as a part of the Complete Works of F. M. Dostoevsky (1974 and 2021)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article contains an analysis of the texts of two academic publications of F. M. Dostoevskyʼs novel “Demons” – as a part of the Complete Works in 30 volumes (1972–1990) and the currently published Complete Works in 35 volumes. The textual and historical-literary problems associated with these publications are analyzed, the methodology and errors characteristic of each of the publications are considered, the pros and cons of both publications are analyzed. The importance of the issue of the fundamental discrepancy between punctuation of the 19th century and the modern norm, based primarily on the structural and semantic principle of punctuation marks and developed in much more detail than the codes of the 19th century, is pointed out. The preservation of individual elements of archaic punctuation when reading a text by a carrier of a modern punctuation norm has a destructive effect on meaning. The article considers a number of examples showing the inapplicability of elements of old spelling and punctuation in the modern traditional academic tradition.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Konstantin A. Barsht

Institute of Russian Literature (Pushkin House) of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: konstantin_barsht@pushdom.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1152-4083

Doct. Sci. (Philol.), Leading Researcher 

Russian Federation, 4 Makarov Embankment, St. Petersburg, 199034

Mikhail Y. Dymarsky

A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University; Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: dym2005@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1796-7686

Doct. Sci. (Philol.), Ptrofessor at the A.I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, Senior Researcher at the Institute for Linguistic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Russian Federation, 48 River Moyka Embankment, St. Petersburg, 191186; 9 Tuchkov Lane, St. Petersburg, 199053

References

  1. Reiser, S.A. Paleografija i tekstologija novogo vremeni [Paleography and Textual Criticism of Modern Times] Moscow: Prosveshhenie Publ., 1970. 136 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Reiser, S.A. Osnovy tekstologii [Fundamentals of Textology] 2nd ed. Leningrad: Prosveshhenie Publ., 1978. 176 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Likhachev, D.S. Tekstologija: kratkij ocherk [Textual Criticism: A Brief Essay] Moscow, Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1964. 102 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Eihenbaum, B.M. Redaktor i kniga [Editor and Book]. Issue 3. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 1962. 98 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Grishunin, A.L. Issledovatelskie aspekty tekstologii [Research Aspects of Textual Studies]. Moscow: Nasledie Publ., 1998. 413 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Nechaeva, V.S. Problema ustanovlenija tekstov v izdanijah literaturnyh proizvedenij XIX i XX vekov [The Problem of Establishing Texts in Publications of Literary Works of the 19th and 20th centuries]. Voprosy tekstologii [Topics in the Study of Textual Criticism. Collective monography]. Moscow: Edition ASUSSR Publ., 1957, pp. 29–88. (In Russ.)
  7. Berezkina, S.V. “Unizhennye i oskorblennye” Dostoevskogo: tri teksta, tri izdanija [“Humiliated and Insulted” by Dostoevsky: Three Texts, Three Editions]. Russkaya literatura [Russian Literature]. 2011, No. 3, pp. 97–109. (In Russ.)
  8. Dostoevsky, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 30 t. [Complete Works in 30 Vols.]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1972–1990. (In Russ.)
  9. Dostoevsky, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 35 t. [Complete Works in 35 Vols.]. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2013. 814 p. (In Russ.)
  10. Barsht, K.A. Kraj i seredina autentichnosti. Zametki o tekstologii Dostoevskogo [The Edge and the Middle of Authenticity. Notes on Dostoevskyʼs Textology]. Voprosy literatury [Topics in the Study of Literature]. 2020, No. 4, pp. 154–178. (In Russ.)
  11. Barsht, K.A. O tekstologii proizvedenij F.M. Dostoevskogo, intonacionnoj punktuacii XIX veka i grammaticheskoj norme sovremennogo russkogo jazyka (na materiale 9-go toma Polnogo sobranija sochinenij F.M. Dostoevskogo v 35 t. SPb.: Nauka, 2020. 1029 s.) [On the Textual Criticism of F.M. Dostoevskyʼs Works, Intonation Punctuation of the 19th Century and the Grammatical Norm of the Modern Russian Language]. Izvestiâ Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Seriâ literatury i âzyka [Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences: Studies in Literature and Language]. 2023, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 34–48. (In Russ.)
  12. Dostoevsky, F.M. Besy [Demons]. Dostoevsky, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 35 t. [Complete Works in 35 Vols.]. Vol. 10. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2021. 580 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Dostoevsky, F.M. Besy [Demons]. Dostoevsky, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: v 30 t. [Complete Works in 30 Vols.]. Vol. 10. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1974. 520 p. (In Russ.)
  14. Dostoevsky, F.M. Besy [Demons]. St. Petersburg: Tipography K. Zamyslovskogo Publ., 1873. 977 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Pravila russkoj orfografii i punktuacii [Rules of Russian Spelling and Punctuation] Polnyj akademicheskij spravochnik [The Complete Academic Handbook]. Ed. by V.V. Lopatin. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2007. 301 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Dostoevsky, F.M. Besy [Demons]. Dostoevsky, F.M. Polnoe sobranie khudozhestvennykh proizvedenij [The Complete Collection of Works of Art]. Vol. 7. Leningrad: Gov. Publ. House, 1927. 616 p. (In Russ.)
  17. Pakhomov, V.M., Svintsov, V.V., Filatova, I.V. Trudnye sluchai russkoj punktuacii: Slovar-spravochnik [Difficult Cases of Russian Punctuation: Dictionary-Reference]. Moscow, 2012. 577 p. (In Russ.)
  18. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Sintaksis: Uchebnik i praktikum dlja akademicheskogo bakalavriata [Modern Russian language. Syntax: Textbook and Workshop for Academic Undergraduate Studies]. Ed. by S.G. Ilyenko, M.Ja. Dymarsky. Moscow: Jurajt Publ., 2016. 391 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences