The impact of non-local activation and associated water phase para-state on an aquatic organisms Daphnia Magna lifetime

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. The work is devoted to the study of associated water phase magnetic state influence, represented by amorphous ice with a modified ratio of isomers in the increasing of para-water proportion, and non-local water activation based on the technology of non-local quantum water conjugation with the production activating process, on the vital hydrobionts Daphnia magna signs.

Material and methods. The studies were carried out using non-locally activated drinking water “Si” and a para-water concentrate prepared in hypomagnetic conditions at a residual magnetic flux density not more than 20ntl according to the manufacturer’s technology. The para-water concentrate was introduced into the hydrobionts medium in the ratio of 9 ml per 1 liter of water under study.

To obtain offspring, individuals were used, derived on the settled tap water (1st generation) and individuals, derived on the water “Si” - 2nd generation. One-day individuals of Daphnia magna were placed in the amount of 20pcs/l of the studied water and the entire life cycle were kept in optimal conditions: climatostat P-2 (temperature - 20±1°C, illumination – 1200-2500lux, photoperiod - 12/12) hour. Feeding of Daphnia was carried out by Chlorella microalgae grown on the medium “Tamiya”-50% with a density D=0.65-0.72.

Results. The life expectancy of Daphnia magna hydrobionts in the non-locally activated environment (water “Si”) increases by an average of 38 days in the first generation and 50 days in the second generation, and in an environment with a potentiating additive para-water associates for 58 days (first generation) and 41 days (second generation).The life expectancy of aquatic animals is related by negative correlation with the change in values of the oxidation-reductant potential (Eh) of the environment of hydrobionts development (kCorr.=-0.993 (1st generation). Both non-local water activation and spin-modification of its associated phase by para-isomers demonstrate an increase in the hydrobionts productivity:

  • in non-locally activated water – 1.20 (1st generation) and 2.68 (2nd generation);
  • in non-locally activated water with the addition of para-water – 1.39 (1st generation) and 1.97 (2nd generation) times.

Conclusion. From the results it follows that the determining factor in the hydrobionts medium is its quantum coupling with electron sources in the external environment. This determines the importance of water quantum coupling with natural ecosystems, affecting cellular metabolism. Spin para modification of the associated water phase leads to an additional increase in the hydrobionts life expectancy in the first generation. In the second generation, the influence of para-water is accompanied by some decrease in both the life hydrobionts expectancy and their productivity.

About the authors

Tatyana I. Iksanova

Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health

Author for correspondence.
Email: iti-1@mail.ru

Researcher of the environmental health department, Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, 119121, Russian Federation.

e-mail: iti-1@mail.ru

Russian Federation

D. B. Kamenetskya

Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9050-3757
Russian Federation

A. A. Stekhin

Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8750-0686
Russian Federation

G. V. Yakovleva

Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8766-2773
Russian Federation

M. G. Kochetkova

Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9616-4517
Russian Federation

References

  1. Avdeeva L.V., Koltover V.K. Nuclear spin catalysis in nature. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Khimiya [Vestnik of Moscow state University. Chemistry]. 2016; 57 (3): 145–53. (in Russian)
  2. Letuta U.G. Magnetic isotope effects in E. сoli cells. Autoabstract of Diss. Sаrаtоv; 2012. 24 p. (in Russian)
  3. Shevchenko U.G., Avdeeva E.I., Berdyanskiy V.L. Biological effects of magnetic isotope 25Mg in E. сoli cells. Khimicheskaya fizika [Chemical physics]. 2012; 31 (7): 1–18. (in Russian)
  4. Koltover V.K., Shevchenko U.G. et al. Magnetic isotopic effect of magnesium in a living cell. Doklady Akademii nauk [Reports of the Science Academy]. 2012; 442 (2): 272–4. (in Russian)
  5. Buchachenko A.I. Magnetic isotope effects in chemistry and biochemistry. New York: Nova Science Publishes; 2009. 149 p.
  6. Kiprianov A.A. Nonequilibrium and many-body magnetic-spin effects in radical reactions. Diss. Novosibirsk; 2014. (in Russian)
  7. Nelson D.L., Cox M.M. Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. N.Y.: 2008. 1100 p.
  8. Pershin M. Two-liquid water. Physics of Wave Phenomena. 2005; 13: 192–208.
  9. Pershin S.M. Harmonic oscillations of the concentration of H-bonds in liquid water. Laser Phys. 2006; 16: 1184–90.
  10. Gibert K.K., Stekhin A.A., Yakovleva G.V., Sulina Yu.S. Preservation of electron-donor properties of water. Gigiyena i sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian Journal]. 2015; 3: 23: 97–100. (in Russian)
  11. Andreev S.N., Makarov V.P., Tikhonov V.I., Volkov A.A. Ortho and para molecules of water in electric field. Chemical Physics. 2007, 4: 4–8.
  12. Guidelines for the establishment of maximum permissible concentrations of pollutants for the water of fishery water bodies. Moscow: VNIPO; 1986. (in Russian)
  13. Kupriyanov R.V. Zhdanov R.I. Stress and allostasis: problems, prospects and interrelation. Zhurnal vysshey nervnoy deyatel’nosti [Journal of Higher Nervous Activity]. 2014; 64 (1): 21–31. (in Russian)
  14. Stekhin A., Yakovleva G., Pronko K., Zemskov V. Water as the main regulator of intracellular processes. Clin Pract. 2018; 15 (5): 841–55. https://doi.org/10.4172/clinical-practice.1000418
  15. Asselman J., Pfrender M.E., Lopez J.A., De Coninck D.I. Conserved transcriptional responses to cyanobacterial stressors are mediated by alternate regulation of paralogous genes in Daphnia. Mol Ecol. 2015; 24 (8): 1844–55.
  16. Malafeeva E.F., Shalashova O.V. Hydrobionts as markers of ecological state of lakes of the Desert natural complex. Sovremennyye nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii [Modern Research and Innovation]. 2014; 8 (1). Available at: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2014/08/37314 (date of treatment: 25.03.2019). (in Russian)
  17. Kuznetsov V.A. Estetichnost environment factors as ecological optimum for aquatic organisms. Diss. 2005. 320 p. (in Russian)
  18. Potekhin S.A., Khusainova R.S. Spin-dependent absorption of water molecules. Biophys Chem. 2005; 118: 84–7.
  19. Ben-Naim A. Molecular recognition-viewed through the eyes of the solvent. Biophys Chem. 2002; 101–2: 309–19.
  20. De Oliveira G.A.P., Silva J.L. A hypothesis to reconcile the physical and chemical unfolding of proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online. 2015; E2775–E2784.
  21. Nucci N.V., Pometun M.S., Wand A.J. Mapping the hydration dynamics of ubiquitin. J Am Chem Soc. 2011; 133: 12326–9.
  22. Librizzi F., Carrotta R., Peters J., Cupane A. The effects of pressure on the energy landscape of proteins. Sci Rep. 2018; 8: 2037.
  23. Urquidi C.J., Benmore J., Neuefeind B., Tomberli C.A., Tulk M., Guthrie P.A. et al. Isotopic quantum effects on the structure of low density amorphous ice. J Phys Condens Matter. 2003; 15: 3657–64.
  24. Best R.B., Miller C., Mittal J. Role of solvation in pressure-induced helix stabilization. J Chem Phys. 2014; 141: 22D522.
  25. Capponi S., Heyden M., Bondar A.-N., Tobias D.J., White S.H. Anomalous behavior of water inside the SecY translocon. PNAS. 2015; 112: 9016–21.
  26. Xu Y., Havenith M. Perspective: Watching low-frequency vibrations of water in biomolecular recognition by THz spectroscopy. J Chem Phys. 2015; 143: 170901.
  27. Vaillant C., Althorpe S.C., Wales D.J. Path integral energy landscapes for water dimer. J Chem Theory Comput. (2019) Article in press. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00675
  28. Martin D.R., Matyushov D.V. Dipolar Nanodomains in Protein Hydration Shells. J Phys Chem Lett. 2015; 6: 407– 12. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz5025433
  29. Saha D., Supekar S., Mukherjee A. Distribution of Residence Time of Water Around DNA Base Pairs: Governing Factors and the Origin of Heterogeneity. J Phys Chem B. 2015; 119: 11371– 81. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b03553
  30. Lavery R., Maddocks J.H., Pasi M., Zakrzewska K. Analyzing Ion Distributions Around DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42: 8138–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku504
  31. Meisburger S.P., Pabit S.A., Pollack L. Determining the Locations of Ions and Water around DNA from X-Ray Scattering Measurements. Biophys J. 2015; 108: 2886–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.05.006

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Iksanova T.I., Kamenetskya D.B., Stekhin A.A., Yakovleva G.V., Kochetkova M.G.



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.