Influence of synthesis method on morphology and functional properties of li-rich layered oxides

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The influence of the precursor synthesis method on the functional properties of cathode material based on lithium-rich oxides was studied. Precursors were obtained by co-precipitation method (hydroxide and carbonate precursors) and solvothermal method (hydroxide and oxalate precursors). Within the selected synthesis methods, the parameters were changed by varying the precipitant and pH of precipitation during the synthesis by co-precipitation method and the reaction medium/precipitant combinations during the solvothermal synthesis method. The solid-phase reaction of the investigated precursors with lithium source and subsequent high-temperature annealing resulted in lithium-rich layered oxides of the composition Li1.2Ni0.133Mn0.534Co0.133O2. The sample synthesized by solvothermal method exhibits high discharge capacity values of 233.2 mAh/g (0.1 C) and 175.3 mAh/g (0.5 C) with residual discharge capacity of 94 and 80.5%, respectively. The samples with comparable electrochemical performance are similar in morphology. These materials are agglomerated and characterized by a bimodal distribution with maxima in the 14–19 μm and 55–60 μm regions. An approach that takes into account the relationship between morphology and electrochemical properties will allow the preparation of higher performance electrode materials for lithium-ion battery.

Негізгі сөздер

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

A. Medvedeva

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

E. Makhonina

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

M. Klimenko

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

Y. Politov

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

A. Rumyantsev

Ioffe Institute Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, St Petersburg, 194021

Y. Koshtyal

Ioffe Institute Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, St Petersburg, 194021

A. Goloveshkin

Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow, 119334

A. Kurlykin

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: anna.ev.medvedeva@gmail.com
Ресей, Moscow, 119991

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Masias A., Marcicki J., Paxton W.A. // ACS Energy Lett. 2021. V. 6. № 2. P. 621. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c02584
  2. Choi D., Shamim N., Crawford A. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2021. V. 511. P. 230419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230419
  3. Malhotra A., Battke B., Beuse M. et al. // Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016. V. 56. P. 705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.085
  4. Nitta N., Wu F., Lee J.T. et al. // Mater. Today. 2015. V. 18. № 5. P. 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040
  5. Murdock B.E., Toghill K.E., Tapia‐Ruiz N. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2021. V. 11. № 39. P. 2102028. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102028
  6. Ji X., Xia Q., Xu Y. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2021. V. 487. P. 229362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229362
  7. Shukla A.K., Ramasse Q.M., Ophus C. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2015. V. 6. № 1. P. 8711. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9711
  8. Genevois C., Koga H., Croguennec L. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. С. 2015. V. 119. № 1. P. 75. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509388j
  9. Viji M., Budumuru A.K., Hebbar V. et al. // Energy Fuels. 2021. V. 35. № 5. P. 4533. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04061
  10. Guo L., Tan X., Mao D. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2021. V. 370. P. 137808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137808
  11. Bian X., Zhang R., Yang X. // Inorg. Chem. 2020. V. 59. № 23. P. 17535. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02766
  12. Song B., Liu Z., Lai M.O. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012. V. 14. № 37. P. 12875. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp42068f
  13. Hu E., Yu X., Lin R. et al. // Nat. Energy. 2018. V. 3. № 8. P. 690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0207-z
  14. Zheng H., Han X., Guo W. et al. // Mater. Today Energy. 2020. V. 18. P. 100518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100518
  15. Fell C.R., Qian D., Carroll K.J. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2013. V. 25. № 9. P. 1621. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm4000119
  16. Lei Y., Ni J., Hu Z. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2020. V. 10. № 41. P. 2002506. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002506
  17. Медведева А.Е., Махонина Е.В., Печень Л.С. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. V. 67. № 7. P. 896.
  18. Печень Л.С., Махонина Е.В., Медведева А.Е. и др. // Докл. АН. Сер. Химия, науки о материалах. 2022. Т. 502. С. 66.
  19. Печень Л.С., Махонина Е.В., Медведева А.Е. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2022. Т. 58. № 10. С. 1069.
  20. Fu F., Tang J., Yao Y. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016. V. 8. № 39. P. 25654. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b09118
  21. Li H., Wei X., Yang P. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2018. V. 261. P. 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.119
  22. Fu F., Huang Y., Wu P. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2015. V. 618. P. 673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.191
  23. Li H., Ren Y., Yang P. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2019. V. 297. P. 406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.195
  24. Luo W. // J. Alloys Compd. 2015. V. 636. P. 24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.02.163
  25. Chen L., Su Y., Chen S. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2014. V. 26. № 39. P. 6756. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201402541
  26. Yu R., Zhang X., Liu T. et al. // ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017. V. 5. № 10. P. 8970. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01773
  27. Kurilenko K.A., Shlyakhtin O.A., Brylev O.A. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2015. V. 152. P. 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.045
  28. Ramesha R.N., Dasari Bosubabu, Karthick Babu M.G. et al. // ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020. V. 3. № 11. P. 10872. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c01897
  29. Pechen L., Makhonina E., Medvedeva A. et al. // Nanomaterials. 2022. V. 12. № 22. P. 4054. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12224054
  30. Pechen L.S., Makhonina E.V., Medvedeva A.E. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 5. P. 777. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621050144
  31. Kleiner K., Strehle B., Baker A.R. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2018. V. 30. № 11. P. 3656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00163
  32. Strehle B., Kleiner K., Jung R. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017. V. 164. № 2. P. A400. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1001702jes
  33. Phillips P.J., Bareño J., Li Y. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2015. V. 5. № 23. P. 1501252. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501252
  34. Shen S., Hong Y., Zhu F. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018. V. 10. № 15. P. 12666. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b00919
  35. Thackeray M.M., Kang S.-H., Johnson C.S. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. 2007. V. 17. № 30. P. 3112. https://doi.org/10.1039/b702425h

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Supplementary
Жүктеу (3MB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 1. Microphotographs of the precursors: carbonate-based PR-CC (a), oxalate-based PR-S3 (b), and hydroxide-based PR-SH (c), PR-S1 (d), and PR-S2 (e).

Жүктеу (694KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 2. Microphotographs of the lithiated oxides LR-CC (a), LR-S3 (b), LR-SH (c), LR-S1 (d) and LR-S2 (e).

Жүктеу (722KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 3. Differential agglomerate size distribution curves for samples based on hydroxide precursors LR-CC, LR-S1, LR-S2 (a), carbonate precursor LR-CC (b) and oxalate precursor LR-S3 (c).

Жүктеу (164KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 4. Diffractograms of lithiated samples (a), enlarged area 20-25 2θ (b).

Жүктеу (255KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 5. Dependence of discharge capacity on cycle number for synthesized samples at 0.1C (a) and 0.4C (b).

Жүктеу (250KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 6. Charge-discharge curves of synthesized samples at 0.4C.

Жүктеу (571KB)
Метадеректер
9. Fig. 7. Dependences of stress on cycle number (a) and specific energy value (b) for the synthesized samples.

Жүктеу (353KB)
Метадеректер
10. Fig. 8. Curves of the first derivative of capacitance on voltage from voltage (dQ/dV) for 2 cycles (a) and 67 cycles (b).

Жүктеу (310KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024