Big Orientation Test: Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The results of evaluation of psychometric properties of the newly developed questionnaire “Big Orientation Test” (BOT) are presented. The standardization sample consisted of college students, university students, doctorate students, and adults (N=1648) aged 16–63 (M=19.35; SD=6.52), women — 76%. The study provides data on construct validity — convergent and discriminant validity, and on reliability of the measure. The analysis carried out allows to conclude that the assessment tool is suitable for both for research purposes and for solving a wide range of applied problems in various areas of social practice — business, education, politics, medicine, jurisprudence, etc.

About the authors

D. F. Aliev

Russian State Social University

Russian Federation, Moscow

D. V. Kashirsky

Russian State Social University

Russian Federation, Moscow

V. V. Urozhenko

Russian State Social University

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Алиев Д.Ф. Исследование успешности и разработка прикладной модели компетенций (отчет о НИР). М.: ММВШБ “МИРБИС” (Институт), 2017.
  2. Асмолов А.Г. О предмете психологии личности // Вопросы психологии. 1983. № 3. С. 118–124.
  3. Выготский Л.С. Избранные психологические произведения. М.: Изд-во АПН РСФСР, 1956.
  4. Иванников В.А. О понятийном арсенале психологии // Вопросы психологии. 2018. № 3. С. 94–104.
  5. Леонтьев А.Н. Деятельность, сознание, личность. М.: Политиздат, 1975.
  6. Ломов Б.Ф. Методологические и теоретические проблемы психологии. М.: Наука, 1984.
  7. Парадигмы в психологии: науковедческий анализ / ред. А.В. Юревич, Т.В. Корнилова, А.Л. Журавлев. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2012.
  8. Allport G.W., Odbert H.S. Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 1936. V. 47. № 1. i–171.
  9. Allport G.W., Vernon P.E., Lindzey G. Study of Values (Revised 3rd ed.). Chicago: Riverside Publishing, 1970.
  10. Ashton M., Lee K. Objections to the HEXACO model of personality structure - And why those objections fail // European Journal of Personality, 2020. V. 34. P. 492–510.
  11. Ashton M.C., et al. A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004. V. 86. P. 356–366.
  12. Bandura A. The self-system in reciprocal determinism // American Psychologist. 1978. V. 33. №4. P. 344–358.
  13. Back M.D., Kandler C. Editorial: Some Thoughts on the Relevance, Future Prospects, and Politics of Structural Personality Research // European Journal of Personality, 2020. V. 34. № 4. P. 489–491.
  14. Cattell R.B. The description of personality: basic traits resolved into clusters // The Journ. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1943. V. 38. № 4. P. 476–506.
  15. Eysenck H. Dimensions of Personality. London: Routledge, 1947. 308 p.
  16. Hogan R. Hogan Personality Inventory manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems, 1986.
  17. Quirin M., et al. The dynamics of personality approach (DPA): 20 tenets for uncovering the causal mechanisms of personality // European Journ. of Personality, 2020. V. 34. №6. P. 947–968.
  18. Leary T. Interpersonal Diagnosis of Personality: A Functional Theory and Methodology for Personality Evaluation. New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1957. 518 p.
  19. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Validation of the Five Factor Model of Personality across Instruments and Observers // Journ. of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987. V. 52. P. 81–90.
  20. Norman W.T. Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated Factor Structures in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings // Journ. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963. V. 66. P. 571–583.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Алиев Д.F., Каширский Д.V., Уроженко В.V.