Social Optimism of Russians in a Crisis: Results of a Longitudinal Study

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article considers the main approaches to the study of social optimism as a socio-psychological phenomenon, highlights its theoretical structure and functions. The results of a longitudinal empirical study conducted among adult Russians (N = 664, six measurements) from March 3 to December 26, 2022 and aimed at identifying the socio-psychological antecedents of the stability of social optimism in the conditions of crisis are presented. It is shown that social optimism is directly related to personal characteristics that underlie the resilience: self-efficacy, perceived control, dispositional optimism, positive reframing and seeking emotional support in a critical situation. The study reveals that perceived control increases the stability of the individual's social optimism in a crisis. The higher the social well-being of the individual, the belief in his ability to contribute to the development of society, the more stable is social optimism. The hypothesis is confirmed that social optimism is enhanced by socio-psychological characteristics that facilitate the consolidation of efforts for a joint response to the challenges of the crisis: civic identity; perceived social support; empathy for others affected by the war; generalized trust; trust in civil society institutions; as well as political self-efficacy, that is, the belief in the ability to influence political decisions made in the country. On the contrary, social optimism is negatively associated with belief in a dangerous world, social cynicism, and a conspiracy worldview. The main contribution to the stability of social optimism is made by collective political self-efficacy, while social cynicism accelerates its decline. The results of the study made it possible to suggest the existence of two complementary mechanisms for maintaining social optimism: through strengthening civic identification and the importance of the collective future for the individual (this role is played by moral foundations of respect for authority, loyalty to one’s group and sanctity) and through empathy and strengthening the importance of mutual assistance in a crisis (under the influence of "individualizing" moral foundations of caring for people and fairness).

About the authors

T. A. Nestik

Federal State-financed Establishment of Science, Institute of Psychology RAS

Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13

References

  1. Гончаров С. Ожидания от будущего: взгляды оптимистов и пессимистов [Электронный ресурс] // Левада-центр. 2020. 24 ноября. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2020/11/24/ozhidaniya-ot-budushhego-vzglyady-optimistov-i-pessimistov (дата обращения: 22.11.2022)
  2. Гулевич О., Кривощеков В., Шмыгалева С. Политический цинизм: русскоязычная шкала для измерения негативного отношения к политикам // Психологические исследования. 2020. Т. 13. № 73.
  3. Донцов А.И., Зеленев И.А. О связи категоризации социального окружения (“своих”, “чуждых”, “иных”) с оптимизмом/пессимизмом у россиян // Развитие личности. 2010. № 1. С. 134–150.
  4. Казун А.Д. Эффект “rally around the flag”. Как и почему растет поддержка власти во время трагедий и международных конфликтов? // Полис. Политические исследования. 2017. № 1. С. 136–146.
  5. Нестик Т.А. Коллективный образ будущего: социально-психологические аспекты прогнозирования // Вопросы психологии. 2014. № 1. С. 3–13.
  6. Нестик Т.А. Cоциально-психологические предпосылки и типы долгосрочной ориентации: результаты эмпирического исследования // Психологический журнал. 2021. Т. 42. № 4. C. 28–39.
  7. Нестик Т.А. Образ будущего, социальный оптимизм и долгосрочная ориентация россиян: социально-психологический анализ // СоциоДиггер. 2021. Т. 2. № 9 (14): Горизонты будущего. С. 6–48.
  8. Нестик Т.А. Переживание эпидемиологической угрозы россиянами как социально-психологический феномен: результаты серии эмпирических исследований // Влияние пандемии на личность и общество: психологические механизмы и последствия / Отв. ред. Т.А. Нестик, А.Л. Журавлев, А.Е. Воробьева. М.: Изд-во “Институт психологии РАН”, 2021. С. 19–125.
  9. Нестик Т.А., Журавлев А.Л. Психология глобальных рисков. М.: Изд-во “Институт психологии РАН”, 2018.
  10. Сычев О.А., Протасова И.Н., Белоусов К.И. Диагностика моральных оснований: апробация русскоязычной версии опросника MFQ // Российский психологический журнал. 2018. Т. 15. № 3. P. 88–115.
  11. Темницкий А.Л. Социокультурные факторы оптимизма современной молодежи России // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2016. Т. 4. № 4. С. 19–35.
  12. Тощенко Ж.Т. Социальное настроение — феномен современной социологической теории и практики // Социологические исследования. 1998. № 1. С. 21–34.
  13. Arbuckle J.L. Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data // Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques / Eds. G.A. Marcoulides, R.R. Schumacker. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, 1996.
  14. Bandura A. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2000. V. 9. № 3. P. 75–78.
  15. Birkeland M.S., Blix I., Solberg Ø., Heir T. Does optimism act as a buffer against posttraumatic stress over time? A longitudinal study of the protective role of optimism after the 2011 Oslo bombing // Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2017. V. 9. № 2. P. 207–213.
  16. Burger J.M., Palmer M.L. Changes in and generalization of unrealistic optimism following experiences with stressful events: reactions to the 1989 California earthquake // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1992. V. 18. № 2. P. 39–43.
  17. Duncan T.E., Duncan S.C. An introduction to latent growth curve modeling // Behavior Therapy. 2004. V. 35. № 2. P. 333–363.
  18. Izydorczak K., Antoniuk K., Kulesza W., Muniak P., Doliński D. Temporal aspects of unrealistic optimism and robustness of this bias: A longitudinal study in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic // PLOS ONE. 2022. V. 17. № 12. P. 1–17.
  19. Jefferson A., Bortolotti L., Kuzmanovic B. What is unrealistic optimism? // Consciousness and Cognition. 2016. V. 50. P. 3–11.
  20. Jin B., Kim Y.-C. Rainbows in society: A measure of hope for society // Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2019. V. 22. № 1. P. 18–27.
  21. Matonytė I., Morkevičius V., Lašas A., Jankauskaitė V. The perception of threats to national welfare: the impact of social optimism, self-confidence, and of social and institutional trust // Politologija. 2017. V. 85. № 1. P. 3–55.
  22. Muncy J., Iyer R. The impact of the implicit theories of social optimism and social pessimism on macro attitudes towards consumption // Psychology & Marketing. 2020. V. 37. № 2. P. 216–231.
  23. Pietrantoni L. Collective efficacy // Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research / Ed. A.C. Michalos. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.
  24. Porat R., Tamir M., Wohl M.J., Gur T., Halperin E. Motivated emotion and the rally around the flag effect: liberals are motivated to feel collective angst (like conservatives) when faced with existential threat // Cognition and Emotion. 2019. V. 33. P. 480–491.
  25. Preacher K.J. Latent growth curve models // The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences / Eds. G.R. Hancock, L.M. Stapleton, R.O. Mueller. NY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. P. 178–192.
  26. Schweizer K., Rauch W. An investigation of the structure of the social optimism scale with respect to the dimensionality problem // Journal of Individual Differences. 2008. V. 29. № 4. P. 223–230.
  27. Schweizer K., Schneider R. Social optimism as generalized expectancy of a positive outcome // Personality and Individual Differences. 1997. V. 22. P. 317–325.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Нестик Т.A.