Blepharoptosis: diagnostics and significance of dynamometry for optimizing the treatment of upper lid drooping

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Ptosis of the upper eyelid remains the most common pathology of the auxiliary apparatus of the eye in children and adults alike. Presently, there are no methods of pharmacological correction for the omission of the upper eyelid; hence, only surgical treatment is available. However, the recommended surgery has been associated with unsatisfactory outcomes in 8–26% of all patients. There are several directions of surgical treatment of blepharoptosis, depending on the main cause of its development and degree, such as operations on the muscle that raises the upper eyelid (levator resection, recession, levatoroplasty with the formation of a duplicate of the levator) and its tendons (aponeurosis); operations on the tarsal plate; and “suspension type” operations. Despite the large number of approaches to surgical treatment available for blepharoptosis they are associated with a high risk of hypo and hyper side effects. Therefore, it is not always possible to eliminate the existing changes or damage in different types of ptosis, which may raise the need for a reoperation, which is quite complicated. The standard linear methods for determining the biometric parameters of the mobility of the upper eyelid and degree of ptosis conducted in the preoperative period do not always result in good outcomes. In fact, no reliable criteria allow the prediction of the outcome of surgical treatment with a high degree of probability and planning the volume of surgery. Therefore, it is extremely likely that the addition of dynamometric analysis of the contractile activity of the upper eyelid lifting and tarsal muscles to the scheme of preoperative diagnosis of blepharoptosis, as well as the continuation and intensification of research aimed at creating the doctrine of the pathomorphology of upper eyelid prolapse in the future, will serve as the key factors contributing to the improvement of the results of surgical treatment of blepharoptosis.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Irina A. Filatova

Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases

Email: filatova13@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5449-4980
SPIN-code: 1797-9875

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor

Russian Federation, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya Street, 105062 Moscow

Julia P. Kondratieva

Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases

Email: oftal-julia@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2848-0686

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya Street, 105062 Moscow

Sergey A. Shemetov

Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases

Email: sergeyshemetov87@gmail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4608-5754
SPIN-code: 4397-4425

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya Street, 105062 Moscow

Marina S. Trefilova

Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases

Author for correspondence.
Email: gomfozis@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0770-4882
SPIN-code: 7585-6246

MD, graduate student

Russian Federation, 14/19, Sadovaya Chernogryazskaya Street, 105062 Moscow

References

  1. Sridharan GV, Tallis RC, Leatherbarrow B, Forman WM. A community survey of ptosis of the eyelid and pupil size of elderly people. Age Ageing. 1995;24(1):21–24. doi: 10.1093/ageing/24.1.21
  2. Hashemi H, Khabazkhoob M, Emamian MH, et al. The prevalence of ptosis in an Iranian adult population. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016;28(3):142–145. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.04.005
  3. Kim MH, Cho J, Zhao D, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of blepharoptosis in Korean adult population: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2011. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(6):940–946. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.43
  4. Tan MC, Young S, Amrith S, Sundar G. Epidemiology of oculoplastic conditions: the Singapore experience. Orbit. 2012;31(2):107–113. doi: 10.3109/01676830.2011.638095
  5. Bacharach J, Lee WW, Harrison AR, Freddo TF. A review of acquired blepharoptosis: prevalence, diagnosis, and current treatment options. Eye (Lond). 2021;35(9):2468–2481. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01547-5
  6. Babadzhanova LD, Mavlyanov MSh, Kadirova MA. The effectiveness of resection of the levator in surgical correction of ptosis of the upper eyelid in children. Young scientist. 2017;184(50):116–119. (In Russ).
  7. Ivolgina IV, Fabrikantov OL. Ptoz verkhnego veka. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie. Vybor metoda operatsii. Modern technologies in ophthalmology. 2017;3:212–214. (In Russ).
  8. Finsterer J. Ptosis: causes, presentation, and management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(3):193–204. doi: 10.1007/s00266-003-0127-5
  9. Asano ME, Osaki MH. Quality of life assessment in patients with blepharoptosis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006;69(4):545–549. Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492006000400016
  10. McKean-Cowdin R, Varma R, Wu J, et al. Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(6):1013–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.02.022
  11. Zoumalan CI, Lisman RD. Evaluation and management of unilateral ptosis and avoiding contralateral ptosis. Aesthet Surg J. 2010;30(3):320–328. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10374108
  12. Alniemi ST, Pang NK, Woog JJ, Bradley EA. Comparison of automated and manual perimetry in patients with blepharoptosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29(5):361–363. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31829a7288
  13. Richards HS, Jenkinson E, Rumsey N, et al. The psychological well-being and appearance concerns of patients presenting with ptosis. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(3):296–302. doi: 10.1038/eye.2013.264
  14. Abuzeid ShA. Ob’ektivnye kriterii dlya vybora operativnogo vmeshatel’stva pri vrozhdennykh ptozakh u detei i ikh klinicheskaya otsenka [dissertation]. Odessa; 1985. (In Russ).
  15. Morozov IN, Novikov AV, Rukina NN, Vorob’eva OV. Biomechanical study hand function disorders of patients with cervical spine cord injury. Russian Journal of Biomechanics. 2011;15(2/52):77–83. (In Russ).
  16. Filatova IA. Zabolevaniya nervno-myshechnogo apparata vek. In: Avetisova SE, Egorova EA, Moshchetovoi LK, et al, editors. Oftal’mologiya: natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. P. 312–326. (In Russ).
  17. Beard C. Ptosis. 3rd ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company; 1981. P. 232–266.
  18. Hakimbashi M, Kikkawa DO, Korn BS. Complications of ptosis repair: Prevention and management. Chapter 30. In: Cohen AJ, Weinberg DA, editors. Evaluation and Management of Blepharoptosis. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. P. 275–287. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-92855-5_30
  19. Wong VA, Beckingsale PS, Oley CA, Sullivan TJ. Management of myogenic ptosis. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(5):1023–1031. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01009-6
  20. Albert D, Lucarelli MJ. Clinical atlas of procedures in ophthalmic surgery. Chicago: AMA Press; 2004.
  21. Yilmaz N, Hoşal BM, Zilelioglu G. Congenital ptosis and associated congenital malformations. J AAPOS. 2004;8(3):293–295. doi: 10.1016/S1091853104000485
  22. Baroody M, Holds JB, Vick VL. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of ptosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16(6):351–355. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000186647.00413.21
  23. McMullan TF, Robinson DO, Tyers AG. Towards an understanding of congenital ptosis. Orbit. 2006;25(3):179–184. doi: 10.1080/01676830600669163
  24. Gadient P, Bolton J, Puri V. Juvenile myasthenia gravis: three case reports and a literature review. J Child Neurol. 2009;24(5):584–590. doi: 10.1177/0883073808325651
  25. Demirci H, Frueh BR, Nelson CC. Marcus Gunn jaw-winking synkinesis: clinical features and management. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(7):1447–1452. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.014
  26. Grusha IaO, Fisenko NV, Blinova IV. Blepharoptosis: diagnostic tests. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2016;132(3):61–65. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2016132361-65
  27. Filatova IA, Shemetov SA. Sposob ukrepleniya nizhnego veka s ispol’zovaniem implantata iz politetraftoretilena (PTFE). Collection of works of the Scientific and Practical Conference of ophthalmologists with international participation, dedicated to the 50th anniversary of the Department of Eye Diseases of the RUDN Medical Institute «Oftal’mologiya. Itogi i perspektivy»; 2015 Mar 12; Moscow, Russia. P. 43–45. (In Russ).
  28. Kataev MG, Dzagurova ZR, Zakharova MA, et al. Fatty degeneration of upper tarsal muscle as etiological factor of acquired upper eyelid ptosis. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2019;135(2):48–54. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/oftalma201913502148
  29. Edmonson BC, Wulc AE. Ptosis evaluation and management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005;38(5):921–946. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2005.08.012
  30. Collin JRO. A manual of systematic eyelid surgery. 3rd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2006.
  31. Putterman AM. Margin reflex distance (MRD) 1, 2, and 3. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28(4):308–311. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3182523b7f
  32. Dadapeer K. Clinical Methods in Ophthalmology: Practical Manual for Undergraduates. New Delhi: JP Medical Ltd; 2013.
  33. Blinova IV. Novye vozmozhnosti ispol’zovaniya verkhnei tarzal’noi myshtsy v korrektsii ptoza verkhnego veka dis … [dissertation]. Moscow, 2005. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/novye-vozmozhnosti-ispolzovaniya-verkhnei-tarzalnoi-myshtsy-v-korrektsii-ptoza-verkhnego-vek. Accessed: 05.05.2023. (In Russ).
  34. Kataev MG. Sovremennyy differentsirovannyy podkhod k khirurgicheskomu lecheniyu ptoza verkhnego veka. Vostok–Zapad. Tochka zreniya. 2014;1:258–259. (In Russ).
  35. Putterman AM, Urist MJ. Müller muscle-conjunctiva resection. Technique for treatment of blepharoptosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93(8):619–623. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1975.01010020595007
  36. Carroll RP. Preventable problems following the Fasanella-Servat procedure. Ophthalmic Surg. 1980;11(1):44–51.
  37. Bang YH, Park SH, Kim JH, et al. The role of Müller’s muscle reconsidered. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(5):1200–1204. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199804050-00004
  38. Lake S, Mohammad-Ali FH, Khooshabeh R. Open sky Müller’s muscle-conjunctiva resection for ptosis surgery. Eye (Lond). 2003;17(9):1008–1012. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700623
  39. Baldwin HC, Bhagey J, Khooshabeh R. Open sky Müller muscle-conjunctival resection in phenylephrine test-negative blepharoptosis patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(4):276–280. doi: 10.1097/01.iop.0000167789.39570.3e
  40. Ben Simon GJ, Lee S, Schwarcz RM, et al. External levator advancement vs Müller’s muscle-conjunctival resection for correction of upper eyelid involutional ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(3):426–432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.033
  41. Ben Simon GJ, Macedo AA, Schwarcz RM, et al. Frontalis suspension for upper eyelid ptosis: evaluation of different surgical designs and suture material. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140(5):877–885. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.031
  42. Michels KS, Vagefi MR, Steele E, et al. Müller muscle-conjunctiva resection to correct ptosis in high-risk patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23(5):363–366. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31814a6415
  43. Grace Lee N, Lin LW, Mehta S, Freitag SK. Response to phenylephrine testing in upper eyelids with ptosis. Digit J Ophthalmol. 2015;21(3):1–12. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2015.05.001
  44. Potyomkin VV, Goltsman EV. Algorithm of objective examination of a patient with blepharoptosis. Ophthalmology Reports. 2019;12(1):45–51. (In Russ). doi: 10.17816/OV2019145-51
  45. Lyon D, Dortzbach R. Upper eyelid positions: Acquired ptosis. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1984.
  46. Wolfort FG, Poblete JV. Ptosis after blepharoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34(3):264–266;discussion 266–267. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199503000-00007
  47. Filatova IA, Shemetov SA. The analysis of complications due to the erroneous strategy of the surgical treatment of the upper lid ptosis. Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology. 2016;11(2):89–92. (In Russ). doi: 10.18821/1993-1859-2016-11-2-89-92
  48. Shchourov VA, Kolchev OV, Boutorina NI. Dynamometry of leg muscles in male patients with the locomotor system diseases. Genij Ortopedii. 2007;3:63–66. (In Russ).
  49. Prokopenko SV, Mozheiko EIu, Alekseevich GV. Methods of assessment of movement functions in the upper limb. Zhurnal Nevrologii I Psikhiatrii imeni S.S. Korsakova. 2016;116(7):101–107. (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/jnevro201611671101-107
  50. Madroszkiewicz M. Oculomyodynamometric measurements of levator muscles of the upper eyelids. Klin Oczna. 1980;82(1):43–44. (In Polish).
  51. Frueh BR, Musch DC. Levator force generation in normal subjects. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1990;88:109–119; discussion 120–121.
  52. Frueh BR, Musch DC. Evaluation of levator muscle integrity in ptosis with levator force measurement. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):244–250. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30709-4
  53. Ofir S, Belkin A, Nemet AY. A Novel Technique for Measuring Eyelid Force. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34(5):472–476. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001057
  54. Pillar S, Almog Y, Sharon T, Dar N, Segal O, Nemet AY. Objective Measurement of Eyelid Force in Ptosis Versus Controls. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(8):2533–2535. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005669
  55. Kataev MG, Orudjov NZ. Perspectives of dynamometry of the levator muscle in the upper eyelid ptosis. Russian Pediatric Ophtalmology. 2008;4:19–20. (In Russ).
  56. Kataev MG. Opyt plasticheskikh operatsii na pridatochnom apparate glaza. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 1986;102(2):38–41. (In Russ).
  57. Basova GG, Deniskina SV, Bashkatova IA. Rezul’taty khirurgicheskogo lecheniya vrozhdennykh ptozov. Materials of the Scientific-Practical Conference «Plasticheskaya khirurgiya pridatochnogo apparata glaza i orbity»; 1996; Moscow, Russia. P. 35–36. (In Russ).
  58. Ivanova VF. Rezul’taty operatsii ispravleniya blefaroptoza. Materials of the Scientific-Practical Conference «Plasticheskaya khirurgiya pridatochnogo apparata glaza i orbity»; 1996; Moscow, Russia. P. 30–31. (In Russ).
  59. Berke RN. Results of resection of the levator muscle through a skin incision in congenital ptosis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1958;56:288–322;discussion 323–326.
  60. Kataev M, Filatova I. Whitnall’s ligament in levator resection procedure. Abstracts of 13th Meeting of ESOPRS; 1995 May 31–June 1; Rostock, Venue. P. 68.
  61. Kataev MG, Orudzhov NZ. Dinamometricheskaya kharakteristika levatora verkhnego veka pri razlichnykh vidakh ptoza. 1st Russian National Ophthalmological Forum: Collection of Scientific Papers; 2008 Oct 9–10; Moscow, Russia. P. 194–197. (In Russ).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 86503 от 11.12.2023 г. 
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ЭЛ № ФС 77 - 80630 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies